Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

The 787 - What happens in a fire?

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

The 787 - What happens in a fire?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2007, 07:33
  #21 (permalink)  
bgc
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They added a layer of aluminium mesh to the outer skin of the aircraft. Aluminium is one of the best conductors around, they even make power lines out of it. I think the purpose is that whenever lightning strikes it will travel through the mesh and away from the aircraft. Adding alu mesh to the 787 wing made the wing 2.5% heavier. Not sure how they test it thou. I remember watching a documentary about a super puma that crashed into the north sea because of a lightning strike to the tail rotor. The blades were carbon composite held in place by aluminium attachments. Whenever the lightning tried to travel between the carbon composite and the aluminium there was a massive build up of energy that caused some of the blades to break off. They traced the problem back to the fact that whenever the aircraft was certified a different tail rotor was used so the one on the aircraft that day wasn't lightning strike tested so it is an important test I just don't know how they do it but I'm sure it involves man made lightning.

more info here:

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm..._boeing05.html

Last edited by bgc; 2nd Aug 2007 at 19:33.
bgc is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2007, 06:20
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Snakepit Sydney
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will be interesting to see when lightening does strike it and the damage it will do to the carbon fibre structure....the repair maybe horrendous
Hardworker is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2007, 11:30
  #23 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
There are composite structures out there already, the damage by lightening would not come as a surprise. Alu cage sounds a good Idea.

Anyone remember (from the RAF) community the first pair of GR5s in service and the resulting wing delamination caused as one of them was struck by lightening as they flew in close formation for a photo shoot. - The Lightening struck one then flashed to the other causing 2 u/s A/C!!
AR1 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2007, 16:01
  #24 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there an MSDS for the 787?
Bus429 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2007, 18:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those interested in this subject, you can find a good deal of relevant data concerning FAA's latest thinking by going to site www.rgl.faa.gov and then choosing Special Conditions and next search for 787-8 and you will get all proposed and final Special Conditions at present for 787.
Regarding fire and FST, I refer all to Final Special Condition "Boeing Model 787-8 Airplane; Composite Fuselage In -Flight Fire/Flammability Resistance" and please read in detail. Also two Proposed Special Conditions should be of interest, namely Crash-worthiness and Fuel-Fed Wing Tank fire. Both of these should be final in next month or so.
Hope of help and interest.
Amicus
amicus is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 17:20
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Maastricht netherlands
Age: 77
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
laarbruch crash

I am working on a report about all composite aircraft and am interested in the 1997 Laarbruch accident. All I can find is a short entry in the harrier production list "Encountered a problem on take-off for a proposed low-level training flight in the UK and crashed back onto runway at RAF Laarbruch, Germany. The aircraft crashed inverted and was destroyed by an intense fire, even though fire crews were on the scene immediately and extinguished the blaze within two minutes. The main runway had to be closed following the crash, but resident aircraft and helicopters were able to continue operations from the taxiways." This is a bit confusing because of an article by Wing Commander Andrews (AGARD –CP-587, NATO, 1996) and (Living with composites: fire resistance) that mentions a crash in Denmark 1990 and seven months later a crash in German woodland. Now 'lessons learned' measured were taken in that first responders were properly dressed and so on. Was this the case with the the 1997 accident. I just have to know when I quote.
Hans Peter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.