Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Gash or by the book?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2004, 22:09
  #1 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gash or by the book?

Would you rather have a reputation as a gash, "pen-it-off" and ignore the regulations certifier; or could you live with being a (for the most part!) a "by-the-book" certifying aircraft maintenance engineer?
Bus429 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 02:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: WSSS
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile By the book

Depends on the nature of the defect. When faced with a lot transits one can get a little flexible. Experience does come into play here but we are here because we know when to say NO! An analogy I have heard many a times...don't cut into my drinking time...but then these words are spoken by people who are are there for a long time. I would say that I am more of a by the book type. Cheers
lucky7 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 06:09
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
By the book.

If I can't do it by the book, the book needs re-writing.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 07:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Daylight Saving Free Zone
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you are young and "invincible" it is very easy to feel like you can pen things off (the nature of your company can instill those thoughts in ones brain for comercial reasons).
But dont ever compromise saftey...... How? .... Use 'the book' and throw its contents at those who try to influence you to do otherwise. It sure beats the hell out of 'the book' being thrown at you in a court of law.

By the book for me. You're covered.
sprocket is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 07:21
  #5 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm glad there are a few who think like me! In the past, I've been criticised for not being "flexible" enough. However, during spells in QA, I've investigated incidents involving excessive flexibility and realise the effects.

I'm not suggesting one should blindly follow an incorrect procedure; highlight the problem and pass it up the chain of support to get it changed.
Bus429 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 10:08
  #6 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

In these days of EASA Part 145 organizations there is nearly always a department whose job is to draft an EO, or similar document, to cover deviations from the book. Unfortunately, the pressure that used to be applied to the certifiers is moving to those who draft EOs. For the most part these guys are professional enough to refuse to cooperate in penning-off defects, but one day someone is bound to slip up...
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 18:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex
Age: 68
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice to see the responses from Licensed Aircraft Engineers who think and feel the same way as I do. As a manager I have always told staff that if they delay an aircraft because they are not satisfied with its serviceabilty and they can justify their actions I will back them every time. This is not a glib statement, it is a fact.
Once you start down the slippery slope of 'pen it off; or 'it'll do a trip' you have crossed the line and your personal standards drop. I always remember, it is my Licence that I worked damned hard and long to get and it is up to me to safeguard my Licence.
Once you get a reputation as a 'pen off' merchant the name sticks and we should avoid employing such people. There will be precious few Licensed Aircraft Engineers to go around in the future as it is so we had better make sure that those that do exist are up for the job and maintain the required high standards.

Temps the Technician
Tempsford is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 19:59
  #8 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Temps,

Unfortunately, some managers prefer pen-off gashos.
Bus429 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2004, 22:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex
Age: 68
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bus,
You may well be right, but not this one!
Temps
Tempsford is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 05:42
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
This one "eases out" such dangerous renegades as fast as possible once it's been established that they won't change.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 20:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..........and who's going to come on here and admit to being a gash roller stamp merchant
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2004, 21:36
  #12 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Golden Rivet,

Good point but you might get someone defending excessive flexibility and the use of "experience" to justify a pen-off!
Bus429 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2004, 22:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what happens when the book is wrong, and don't tell me they never are I have worked with a few.
Do you 1) Ignore it and do according your own experience 2) Refuse to do the job, due missing/incorrect documentation.
Books are a wonderful tool, in the right hands, in the inexperienced hands they are bloody misleading and dangerous.
Brgds
Doc
DoctorA300 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2004, 06:52
  #14 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
You get authorisation to change the book, any organisation worth it's salt should have some mechanism to do this.

After all, "the book" is there to record best practice, and that's not necessarily a fixed quantity.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2004, 23:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex
Age: 68
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Genghis,
I agree with your statement. If the book isn't right, tell the OEM and get it changed. The book is the bench mark. Deviate from written and accepted practices at your peril.

Temps
Tempsford is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2004, 22:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: EGNH
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the book for the most part, there were times when a little deviation was tolerated, but not anymore. By the book is our protection, management may ask you to bend the rules, but would stand a long way back when you are being hauled over the coals.
On the subject of changing the book when we know it to be wrong, yes, we have done where I work.
As I See It is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2004, 11:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: oop north
Age: 54
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice sentiments "temps the technician" im with you 100 per cent, however it must be a good few years since you actually "teched" anything!
smudgethecat is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2004, 19:58
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex
Age: 68
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks smudge,
Shame you had to spoil the response with a 'dig'. I have already admitted in this thread that I was a manager (which you knew already, but you have the advantage of hiding behind a nickname) and by nature of this fact I don't certify anymore. I was in fact relating to Genghis who signs himself as Genghis the Engineer and in a jocular fashion I signed myself as Tempsford the Technician.

Temps

Last edited by Tempsford; 22nd Dec 2004 at 20:21.
Tempsford is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2004, 20:22
  #19 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
I sympathise, I'm largely Genghis the paperpusher at the moment, although I keep trying to rebel.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2004, 20:27
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: East Sussex
Age: 68
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Genghis
Temps
Tempsford is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.