89'ers lovers and haters
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey rescue 1 thanks for that it was so long ago that I had lost the URL <img border="0" title="" alt="[Embarrassed]" src="redface.gif" /> . .. .So if all and sundry who wish to discuss the war want a place to do it and the big W does not want it here then its already established.. .. . <a href="http://www.discussion-board.com/thewar/Ultimate.cgi" target="_blank">A place to talk about 89</a> . .. .see ya there <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" />
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Skull Cave
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As someone earlier said (in as many words), the very fact that banning mention of 89 is being seriously (is it?) considered is enough reason alone to resist. If it is so widely and regularly debated, surely its banning will reduce the reason for Pprune’s being.. .. .And how would it be done? Is the program to be changed to filter all mention of certain key words? (89, ’89, 1989, dispute, scab, Ansett, hero…………..). .. .Or would transgressors be blacklisted if they slipped in a mention of the dreaded event? Considering the 1,200 or so 89ers in the world, the ranks of Dunnunda contributors would take quite a hit.. .. .I’ve said it before and many others have said the same thing – if it upsets you so much, skip to the next thread. I do it all the time, and I don’t start calling for threads that bore me to be banned. I really don’t understand why it upsets people so.
