New PC, just which one?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New PC, just which one?
Its about time I got rid of this old and slow thing and upgraded. However, being quite computer illiterate I have no idea whats good and whats not needed. The computer is just a personal one for 'all your homely needs' including internet, digital camera and MP3 applications.
I have seen several I like, but would like to know the difference between the Pentium 4 and Athlon processors (is there really much difference, as either would be a huge performance increase for me anyhow). Also, are all DVD re-writers still CD-RW's too, or will their individual performances always be listed?
What printers are recommended (a good inkjet seems to do reasonable photo quality) and are printer/scanner/copier all-in-ones any good?
Finally what makes? I've looked at Compaq, Mesh, Dell, Carrera, and Hewlett-Packard. Any that I should totally discount or others I should hunt for, although Apple Mac has been totally discounted, too much a windows man
All and every help is greatly apprechiated, at least to pull this techno out of the 19th Century
Cheers, 5mb
I have seen several I like, but would like to know the difference between the Pentium 4 and Athlon processors (is there really much difference, as either would be a huge performance increase for me anyhow). Also, are all DVD re-writers still CD-RW's too, or will their individual performances always be listed?
What printers are recommended (a good inkjet seems to do reasonable photo quality) and are printer/scanner/copier all-in-ones any good?
Finally what makes? I've looked at Compaq, Mesh, Dell, Carrera, and Hewlett-Packard. Any that I should totally discount or others I should hunt for, although Apple Mac has been totally discounted, too much a windows man
All and every help is greatly apprechiated, at least to pull this techno out of the 19th Century
Cheers, 5mb
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're in the very enviable position of making a completely fresh start.
As someone who used to build 15 to 20 PC's a year I think you're missing a huge opportunity in discounting the Mac. Everything you mention plus linear digital video editing is built into every Mac. Plug in the power and the phone line/cable and it works.
The point to having a Mac is that they really are 'white goods' - like a fridge or freezer they just work while at the same time using standard PC components these days so you aren't raped when you want to add more memory or storage.
However, if you're embarrassed to be seen with a stylish and supremely effective system there's a lunatic selling modified Mac motherboards that will go into a standard PC case
$320 if you're interested
Regards
Rob
As someone who used to build 15 to 20 PC's a year I think you're missing a huge opportunity in discounting the Mac. Everything you mention plus linear digital video editing is built into every Mac. Plug in the power and the phone line/cable and it works.
The point to having a Mac is that they really are 'white goods' - like a fridge or freezer they just work while at the same time using standard PC components these days so you aren't raped when you want to add more memory or storage.
However, if you're embarrassed to be seen with a stylish and supremely effective system there's a lunatic selling modified Mac motherboards that will go into a standard PC case
$320 if you're interested Regards
Rob
Just Binos
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mackay, Australia
Age: 71
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forgive the cheek of somebody who's only a couple of rungs up the ladder from you presuming to give advice, but sometimes advice from a fellow dinosaur is more valuable than from the nerds who want to plug their own needs.
It is my humble opinion that unless you want to play complex games or run massive graphics programs, the bottom-of-the-line entry level computer these days provides waaaaaay more grunt than you will ever need for what you say you are after.
Entry level specs are around 256Mb RAM, 40Gb hard drive, and somewhere in the high 2Gb processor speed. (The likes of you and I will NEVER be able to tell the difference between Pentium and Athlon.) For basic processes, this is ludicrously over-equipped and has happened only because computer manufacturers persist in pushing the fallacy that you must have the latest or be out of date. This is the only way they can sell new computers.
The last thing they want is for people to realise their current computers are good for five years or more, so they keep issuing more complex software which requires more space, memory and speed to operate, but doesn't do any more than what you've got.
I have a 900 Celeron which does everything I could possibly want it to do. Internet speed has buggarall to do with processor speed and everything to do with your ISP. You will be able to store thousands of mp3's on your entry level hard drive.
Get an entry level clone from a reputable dealer, option it to your specs and be amazed at what it can do.
*dons flak jacket to cope with incoming from the nerds*
It is my humble opinion that unless you want to play complex games or run massive graphics programs, the bottom-of-the-line entry level computer these days provides waaaaaay more grunt than you will ever need for what you say you are after.
Entry level specs are around 256Mb RAM, 40Gb hard drive, and somewhere in the high 2Gb processor speed. (The likes of you and I will NEVER be able to tell the difference between Pentium and Athlon.) For basic processes, this is ludicrously over-equipped and has happened only because computer manufacturers persist in pushing the fallacy that you must have the latest or be out of date. This is the only way they can sell new computers.
The last thing they want is for people to realise their current computers are good for five years or more, so they keep issuing more complex software which requires more space, memory and speed to operate, but doesn't do any more than what you've got.
I have a 900 Celeron which does everything I could possibly want it to do. Internet speed has buggarall to do with processor speed and everything to do with your ISP. You will be able to store thousands of mp3's on your entry level hard drive.
Get an entry level clone from a reputable dealer, option it to your specs and be amazed at what it can do.
*dons flak jacket to cope with incoming from the nerds*
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's one of those "80/20" things. You can get 80% of the technology for 20% of the price. Just look at the price of 3GHz compared with 2GHz computers. The price/spec curve is linear until it gets to the stuff that wasn't around a year ago, then the price goes up like a Yak on steroids.
You probably don't *need* this Formula 1 winning performance for most of what ordinary folks do, so buy something that's about a year old tech, and you'll find you can get a pretty good box for £700 or so. Monitor is extra - CRT ones are now very cheap, the ones with flat panel LCD are expensive. If you've got room for a CRT one...
DVD writers do CD writing and reading. But do you *need* to write DVDs? I find I can get all the stuff I need onto the occasional CD.
I built a "state of the art" machine about four years ago (at considerable expense). It's now a museum piece, but it still does all the things it did then, and it's more than adequate for my needs.
What you will need is USB (for the digital camera and the ADSL modem and maybe the printer).
Printers - inkjet (or bubblejet) are fine. Best to get the ones with three separate colour ink cartridges cos that way you don't waste half the ink in the thing. Printers are cheap, ink absurdly expensive.
Laser is excellent if B&W will do - quality's sharper, and damp doesn't make the print go foggy. I've got both, laser for serious stuff, bubblejet for colour pix and stuff.
Now software - that's a whole new ballgame. There is freeware stuff out there that does almost everything Mr Gates's bloatware does. If you have ADSL, you can download it and try it in profusion.
You probably don't *need* this Formula 1 winning performance for most of what ordinary folks do, so buy something that's about a year old tech, and you'll find you can get a pretty good box for £700 or so. Monitor is extra - CRT ones are now very cheap, the ones with flat panel LCD are expensive. If you've got room for a CRT one...
DVD writers do CD writing and reading. But do you *need* to write DVDs? I find I can get all the stuff I need onto the occasional CD.
I built a "state of the art" machine about four years ago (at considerable expense). It's now a museum piece, but it still does all the things it did then, and it's more than adequate for my needs.
What you will need is USB (for the digital camera and the ADSL modem and maybe the printer).
Printers - inkjet (or bubblejet) are fine. Best to get the ones with three separate colour ink cartridges cos that way you don't waste half the ink in the thing. Printers are cheap, ink absurdly expensive.
Laser is excellent if B&W will do - quality's sharper, and damp doesn't make the print go foggy. I've got both, laser for serious stuff, bubblejet for colour pix and stuff.
Now software - that's a whole new ballgame. There is freeware stuff out there that does almost everything Mr Gates's bloatware does. If you have ADSL, you can download it and try it in profusion.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had PC's since the eighties and have used every version of windows since 3.1. Thought I was a total windows man. Bought a Mac Laptop a couple of months ago (at the wifes suggestion)and I will never go back. Makes PC's look like second rate competitors, which of course I now know they are !
Now all I need to do is persuade her that a new G5 is neccessary to replace this crap desktop I'm using.
So in summary don't discount them go out and try.
Now all I need to do is persuade her that a new G5 is neccessary to replace this crap desktop I'm using.
So in summary don't discount them go out and try.
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bought from Carrera a few months ago, 2.8 P4 with Radeon 9700, 17in TFT, 512mb RAM, plus a few other bits and have to say so far so good (I do lots of video stuff and write to DVD's). I have to say that getting the TFT was an inspired choice, I am really impressed with it.
Printer, have used hp since I can remember, only ever had one break and that was replaced within 24hrs, they are versatile in producing good quality text docs and pics.
All in ones - not recommended, jack of all trades master of none.
Remember when reading about peoples experiences with pc's that you always hear the bad stories and hardly ever the good ones. I guess for every bad report there are 10 good ones.
Hope this helps
Printer, have used hp since I can remember, only ever had one break and that was replaced within 24hrs, they are versatile in producing good quality text docs and pics.
All in ones - not recommended, jack of all trades master of none.
Remember when reading about peoples experiences with pc's that you always hear the bad stories and hardly ever the good ones. I guess for every bad report there are 10 good ones.
Hope this helps
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Number two daughter has both PC and Mac. For anything graphic, or artistic, or professional printing, she insists the Mac is the only way.
She says she hasn't turned on the PC in weeks.
She says she hasn't turned on the PC in weeks.
I've been using an HP PSC 950 multi-function printer (print/fax/scan/copy) for about 8 months, and it's brilliant. Very quick, easy and convenient to use, great results, and no longer is my desk littered with too many items. Also very pleased with an 18" Sony TFT monitor, and again it saves so much space.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well you all have certainly got me thinking, and still no nearer to making any decisions. However Rob, you'll be glad to hear I have checked out the Mac online, and then even went to a shop to fiddle with it, and haven't ruled it out totally yet!!! Still, I'm in no hurry just now, so keep it coming and hopefully I'll get it right 
The Oracle
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Naples, Florida U.S.A.
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
5milesbaby,
I look at a Mac as, a car that cannot drive on 80% of the roads. If you are just looking for surfing the net, some casual games, ripping MP3s, and editing Digital Pictures from your camera, a good PC will provide a lot better bang for the buck over a Mac.
The Best Bang for the Buck Components are:
AthlonXP 2500+
nForce2 Motherboard (Integrated GeForce4, USB 2.0, Firewire, Dolby Digital Surround Sound)
512Mb PC-2700 DRR SDRAM
80Gb 7200rpm Hard Drive
48X24X48X16 DVD/CR-RW Optical Drive
17" Flat CRT (or 19") Monitor
Optical Mouse
Logitech Z-560 400W THX Speakers
If you can come close to those components in the computer you buy, it will launch you in to the 21st century without making a huge smoking hole in your wallet.
Take Care,
Capt. Richard J. Gentil, Pres.
Naples Air Center, Inc.
Custom Computers of Naples, Inc.
I look at a Mac as, a car that cannot drive on 80% of the roads. If you are just looking for surfing the net, some casual games, ripping MP3s, and editing Digital Pictures from your camera, a good PC will provide a lot better bang for the buck over a Mac.
The Best Bang for the Buck Components are:
AthlonXP 2500+
nForce2 Motherboard (Integrated GeForce4, USB 2.0, Firewire, Dolby Digital Surround Sound)
512Mb PC-2700 DRR SDRAM
80Gb 7200rpm Hard Drive
48X24X48X16 DVD/CR-RW Optical Drive
17" Flat CRT (or 19") Monitor
Optical Mouse
Logitech Z-560 400W THX Speakers
If you can come close to those components in the computer you buy, it will launch you in to the 21st century without making a huge smoking hole in your wallet.
Take Care,
Capt. Richard J. Gentil, Pres.
Naples Air Center, Inc.
Custom Computers of Naples, Inc.
Binoculars, dont sell yourself short. I make do with an 850 at home. The number of systems (including professionally used) I have seen using 10% of the power is untrue. Worst example was about 7 years ago. Very nice top of the range Tecra laptop. It was never undocked and only used to run a mainframe emulation package. A 386 would have done the job.
Once having moved to PCs from other micros I was using a 4.77 mhz with 256KB ram and Dos 2!. It really was a mistake once we reached the stage of not being able to fit the OS, application and data on the same 360KB floppy disk!
Once having moved to PCs from other micros I was using a 4.77 mhz with 256KB ram and Dos 2!. It really was a mistake once we reached the stage of not being able to fit the OS, application and data on the same 360KB floppy disk!
Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Macs are fine provided that your never going to run any "out of the ordinary" specialist software.
If you are quite sure that you are going to browse the web, process words and spreadsheets, work with photos and graphics using the standard packages and stuff like that then the Mac will do you very well.
However, the moment you want a package to run your Film and TV props hire company, calculate your milk yields or book rooms in your guest house you will have a much greater choice on the PC.
This is as true for flight planning software as well. Jepp Flitestar and NavBox ProPlan, the two most popular packages, are not available on Mac. There may be something but you will not be able to choose either of the most popular ones.
So, there you have it, that's my opinion. If you are absolutely sure that it will always do what you want, get a Mac, but if you have any doubt and want to keep the options open....its got to be a PC (though it pains me to say so)
...and another thing. How useless is your PC really? Rather than starting again you might find that £35 worth of RAM and a reformat (or may £50 worth of new disk) are all you really need.
Try downloading AShampoo and seeing how much crap it clears out for you.
W
If you are quite sure that you are going to browse the web, process words and spreadsheets, work with photos and graphics using the standard packages and stuff like that then the Mac will do you very well.
However, the moment you want a package to run your Film and TV props hire company, calculate your milk yields or book rooms in your guest house you will have a much greater choice on the PC.
This is as true for flight planning software as well. Jepp Flitestar and NavBox ProPlan, the two most popular packages, are not available on Mac. There may be something but you will not be able to choose either of the most popular ones.
So, there you have it, that's my opinion. If you are absolutely sure that it will always do what you want, get a Mac, but if you have any doubt and want to keep the options open....its got to be a PC (though it pains me to say so)
...and another thing. How useless is your PC really? Rather than starting again you might find that £35 worth of RAM and a reformat (or may £50 worth of new disk) are all you really need.
Try downloading AShampoo and seeing how much crap it clears out for you.
W
aka Capt PPRuNe
Join Date: May 1995
Location: UK
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Naples and Collins... absolute typical bolleaux ref the Mac. It is just typical of people who have no idea about the Mac to spout off those figures such as "...I look at a Mac as, a car that cannot drive on 80% of the roads" or "Macs are fine provided that your never going to run any 'out of the ordinary' specialist software." It shows me that you have been force fed the usual diatribe by the deperately embarrased PC users brigade who are afraid to admit that the Mac is good because they have such a limited capability, run of the mill, "I follow the sheep" windoze PC!
Yes, there are one or two specialist programs such as the flight logging ones you mention that are not available for the Mac OS but so what? All you need is Virtual PC for the Mac and you can run any PC package you already have in a seperate window, including all the 'specialist' ones mentioned. Better still though, use some specialist programs available ONLY for the Mac! Virtual PC creates exactly what it says on the box. You have to load your version of Windoze up to and including MX but then it emulates a PC but with all the facilities of the Mac that are plugged into it.
I remember when Flight Sim from MS was ONLY available for the Mac as was Photoshop, Pagemaker, Illustrator and all those other famous packages. The fallacy that the Mac is somehow only 'specialist' for artsy graphics people needs to be dispelled as it is only bandied about by people who refuse to admit they wish they'd bought a Mac in the first place!
I can honestly say that every person I know who has moved from a PC to the Mac has said that they will never go back to using a PC. These are not luddites who know no better but long time users of Windoze systems and specialist users. The few who migrated the other way have also said how they regret the move and will be not be purchasing a Windoze PC next time they fork out.
I admit a certain amount of 'evangelism' for the Mac and I even used to work for an AppleCentre but that is because I have been using Macs since the first 128k one came out. I still have that original!
When I was working for the AppleCentre, and I'm going back to the late 80's, I was involved with selling them into universities and larger corporations. I saw Macs being used in extremely specialist environments because the PC's were just not good enough and none of it was your run-of-the-mill word processing/spreadsheet/database stuff.
5milesbaby, having checked out the Mac, I hope you can have another go. Preferably try out one at a dedicated Apple dealer where the sales person knows what they are talking about and knows how to demonstrate the superb functionality. You'll get good advice on here from most people but beware of the 'nuggets' of disinformation that are occasionally thrown about by people who may not be aware that they have been duped.
Caveat emptor.
Yes, there are one or two specialist programs such as the flight logging ones you mention that are not available for the Mac OS but so what? All you need is Virtual PC for the Mac and you can run any PC package you already have in a seperate window, including all the 'specialist' ones mentioned. Better still though, use some specialist programs available ONLY for the Mac! Virtual PC creates exactly what it says on the box. You have to load your version of Windoze up to and including MX but then it emulates a PC but with all the facilities of the Mac that are plugged into it.
I remember when Flight Sim from MS was ONLY available for the Mac as was Photoshop, Pagemaker, Illustrator and all those other famous packages. The fallacy that the Mac is somehow only 'specialist' for artsy graphics people needs to be dispelled as it is only bandied about by people who refuse to admit they wish they'd bought a Mac in the first place!
I can honestly say that every person I know who has moved from a PC to the Mac has said that they will never go back to using a PC. These are not luddites who know no better but long time users of Windoze systems and specialist users. The few who migrated the other way have also said how they regret the move and will be not be purchasing a Windoze PC next time they fork out.
I admit a certain amount of 'evangelism' for the Mac and I even used to work for an AppleCentre but that is because I have been using Macs since the first 128k one came out. I still have that original!
When I was working for the AppleCentre, and I'm going back to the late 80's, I was involved with selling them into universities and larger corporations. I saw Macs being used in extremely specialist environments because the PC's were just not good enough and none of it was your run-of-the-mill word processing/spreadsheet/database stuff.5milesbaby, having checked out the Mac, I hope you can have another go. Preferably try out one at a dedicated Apple dealer where the sales person knows what they are talking about and knows how to demonstrate the superb functionality. You'll get good advice on here from most people but beware of the 'nuggets' of disinformation that are occasionally thrown about by people who may not be aware that they have been duped.
Caveat emptor.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, OK guys I get the message; Macs are better.
But what is it about Macs that makes them better. I put that another way. Why are they better?
I'm an academic sort of chap who's studied the general subject of computing at MSc level (incomplete). Not just Microsoft stuff. So I have a keen interest in the didactic approach to deciding which is better. We know that the bit order is fundamentally different. But is there something about the benefits of "big-endian" over "little-endian" that makes the Mac superior? Is it the architecture? The quality of the OS writing?
I struggled with PhotoShop 4 on Windows NT4 and lost most of my hair doing it. Now with PS6 on Win2K I never lose a job. I can get by with VideoWave 4 too with Win2K and that's with 500Mhz and 256MB RAM. Even today the embedded software in your domestic appliances is still based on Microsoft's NT so it can't be all that bad.
Is the passion expressd by Mac devotees based on the early disasters caused by Win 95's inability to cope with 3rd Party software houses' attempts to provide software? Certainly there was protectionism in there but show me an industry where protectionism isn't rife unless policed by Government. (Memories of Defence Equipment Procurement cock-ups )
Please convince me in a way that my pragmatism will accept. I have £1500 or more waiting to be spent on replacing my old war horse (and that's not Mistress fob).
[edit to add: PS, my comment above about Imaging and Video being at times frustrating referred only to the speed of processing and redrawing, not crashing or corrupting the data.)
5milesbaby, Great Thread; thanks for kicking it off.
Macs are better.But what is it about Macs that makes them better. I put that another way. Why are they better?
I'm an academic sort of chap who's studied the general subject of computing at MSc level (incomplete). Not just Microsoft stuff. So I have a keen interest in the didactic approach to deciding which is better. We know that the bit order is fundamentally different. But is there something about the benefits of "big-endian" over "little-endian" that makes the Mac superior? Is it the architecture? The quality of the OS writing?
I struggled with PhotoShop 4 on Windows NT4 and lost most of my hair doing it. Now with PS6 on Win2K I never lose a job. I can get by with VideoWave 4 too with Win2K and that's with 500Mhz and 256MB RAM. Even today the embedded software in your domestic appliances is still based on Microsoft's NT so it can't be all that bad.
Is the passion expressd by Mac devotees based on the early disasters caused by Win 95's inability to cope with 3rd Party software houses' attempts to provide software? Certainly there was protectionism in there but show me an industry where protectionism isn't rife unless policed by Government. (Memories of Defence Equipment Procurement cock-ups
)Please convince me in a way that my pragmatism will accept. I have £1500 or more waiting to be spent on replacing my old war horse (and that's not Mistress fob).
[edit to add: PS, my comment above about Imaging and Video being at times frustrating referred only to the speed of processing and redrawing, not crashing or corrupting the data.)
5milesbaby, Great Thread; thanks for kicking it off.
Last edited by fobotcso; 19th Jul 2003 at 00:09.
Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Danny
Someone with a different opinion to yours is not necessarily speaking b0llocks. And there may just be others who have an insightful knowledge of the computer industry, even if you consider yours unsurpassed.
OK, you have worked in an AppleCenter. I'm glad you liked it.
I am Chairman of an international group of software companies which decides on a regular basis which OSs to support on new product. In order to do this we have to we well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of MS, Mac, UNIX/LINUX and AS400, as well as the different internet technologies.
I would say that the requirement to run an emulator before you can run the bulk of the specialist software available is an error-prone kludge, error-prone for both technical and user-related reasons. (The user must learn two environments.)
You may have the opposite view...fine, let's discuss it. But let's not discuss it by announcing each other's informed opinion as b0llocks and disinformation.
One of the nice things about this forum is that people are civilised on their discussion for most the time. It would be nice to keep it so. It certainly doesn't behove you to be the one that lowers that tone.
You may be the big cheese round here, but that doesn't give you the right to be a playground bully.
W
Someone with a different opinion to yours is not necessarily speaking b0llocks. And there may just be others who have an insightful knowledge of the computer industry, even if you consider yours unsurpassed.
OK, you have worked in an AppleCenter. I'm glad you liked it.
I am Chairman of an international group of software companies which decides on a regular basis which OSs to support on new product. In order to do this we have to we well aware of the strengths and weaknesses of MS, Mac, UNIX/LINUX and AS400, as well as the different internet technologies.
I would say that the requirement to run an emulator before you can run the bulk of the specialist software available is an error-prone kludge, error-prone for both technical and user-related reasons. (The user must learn two environments.)
You may have the opposite view...fine, let's discuss it. But let's not discuss it by announcing each other's informed opinion as b0llocks and disinformation.
One of the nice things about this forum is that people are civilised on their discussion for most the time. It would be nice to keep it so. It certainly doesn't behove you to be the one that lowers that tone.
You may be the big cheese round here, but that doesn't give you the right to be a playground bully.
W
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mr C said
That is almost the only reason I keep coming back to PPRuNe (plus a desire to learn while I try to help others). Pretty well gave up the Military Forum long ago for its lack of civility justified under the general description of "banter". Not all bad, but I now read only about one in ten or twenty threads.
One of the nice things about this forum is that people are civilised on their discussion for most the time
The Oracle
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Naples, Florida U.S.A.
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Danny,
Sorry if I struck a nerve there.
I had a MAC 512 with MS Flight Sim 1.0 on the Floppy. I flew the heck out of that thing. (Before I actually ever took the controls of a plane.) It was just stick drawings in black and white, but I learned a lot about flying and instruments from it. I attribute it to being able to to do everything flight wise, short of landing and communicating of course, to private pilot standards on my first flight lesson.
fobotcso,
They must be better, they cost so much more than a PC! 
When I bought my first PC after having a MAC, I really appreciated the greater level of control over your system the PC gave and I never had an interest in a MAC again. (Type A Personality I guess.)
Take Care,
Richard
Sorry if I struck a nerve there.
I remember when Flight Sim from MS was ONLY available for the Mac
fobotcso,
But what is it about Macs that makes them better. I put that another way. Why are they better?
When I bought my first PC after having a MAC, I really appreciated the greater level of control over your system the PC gave and I never had an interest in a MAC again. (Type A Personality I guess.)
Take Care,
Richard
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Richard, a data point with a smile on its face. 
This thread is looking up again. With all that it implies, the concept of control is important when you want to go the edge of, or beyond, the envelope.
Keep off the Type A stuff. It can seriously harm you. To use your own rubric, Take Care! fobs
This thread is looking up again. With all that it implies, the concept of control is important when you want to go the edge of, or beyond, the envelope.Keep off the Type A stuff. It can seriously harm you. To use your own rubric, Take Care! fobs
aka Capt PPRuNe
Join Date: May 1995
Location: UK
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I apologise for my tone in my earlier reply but it was due to raised hackles caused by the often bandied about dismissal of Macs with generic statements like "..."out of the ordinary" specialist software." Can you please elaborate exactly what you mean by 'specialist'?
Whilst I worked for an AppleCentre, I must state that I was Technical Director and was heavily involved in integrating Macs into IT depratments where they allowed individuals or more likely groups to have their own choice of computer and those wanting Macs had to be able to integrate them into the existing networks, often requiring access into mainfame systems as well as data sharing with other PC users.
What used to frustrate me then as it does now, was the pooh pooing by IT managers who refused to even consider the qualities of the Mac just because it wasn't 'Big Blue'! Nowdays, those attitudes are probably still there but I don't see them because of my career change!
If you ask me what makes Macs better then I'd have to say that the consistency of the interface when using any application. Once you learn the basics of using a Mac you can apply that knowledge to any application.
Although the interface I mention above is probably at the core of what makes the Mac so good, it is also the quality of the design that has gone into the Operating System and the hardware. The latest incarnation of the Operating System actually is running on a Unix substructure. Compare Unix to the Dos that still lies at the heart of the Windoze operating system and you have no contest.
The price of Macs is actually very competitive when you compare it to a PC. The build quality is very high but more importantly, by the time you add all the extras to a PC to bring it up to a similar spec and quality to a Mac the Mac usually wins hands down.
Whilst Microsoft has gone a long way to improve its Windoze OS and now has a much slicker interface, it is still encumbered with all the extra fat that MS insists you need... whether you do or don't.
So, when refering to 'specialist software' what exactly are you refering to? I wonder if there is a Windows program that 'emulates' a fully blown Mac OS? I usually only use my 'emulator' when I need to run a Windoze browser to check programming changes to pages on the web for compatibility. Apart from that, I have found every piece of software I need available for the Mac, including all the 'specialist' ones.
If you are trying to decide whether to upgrade to a new PC or go the full hog and convert to a Mac just ask all the pople who have migrated from the PC to the Mac why, if the Mac userbase is less than 5% of all computer users is the response so favourable for the Mac and its OS? I don't see many people advocating moving to the PC after having been Mac users all their lives. Make sure you are comparing Operating Systems properly. The latest Mac OS is OS X and the Widoze one is, I believe Winows MX. I stand to be corrected though.
Whilst I worked for an AppleCentre, I must state that I was Technical Director and was heavily involved in integrating Macs into IT depratments where they allowed individuals or more likely groups to have their own choice of computer and those wanting Macs had to be able to integrate them into the existing networks, often requiring access into mainfame systems as well as data sharing with other PC users.
What used to frustrate me then as it does now, was the pooh pooing by IT managers who refused to even consider the qualities of the Mac just because it wasn't 'Big Blue'! Nowdays, those attitudes are probably still there but I don't see them because of my career change!
If you ask me what makes Macs better then I'd have to say that the consistency of the interface when using any application. Once you learn the basics of using a Mac you can apply that knowledge to any application.
Although the interface I mention above is probably at the core of what makes the Mac so good, it is also the quality of the design that has gone into the Operating System and the hardware. The latest incarnation of the Operating System actually is running on a Unix substructure. Compare Unix to the Dos that still lies at the heart of the Windoze operating system and you have no contest.
The price of Macs is actually very competitive when you compare it to a PC. The build quality is very high but more importantly, by the time you add all the extras to a PC to bring it up to a similar spec and quality to a Mac the Mac usually wins hands down.
Whilst Microsoft has gone a long way to improve its Windoze OS and now has a much slicker interface, it is still encumbered with all the extra fat that MS insists you need... whether you do or don't.
So, when refering to 'specialist software' what exactly are you refering to? I wonder if there is a Windows program that 'emulates' a fully blown Mac OS? I usually only use my 'emulator' when I need to run a Windoze browser to check programming changes to pages on the web for compatibility. Apart from that, I have found every piece of software I need available for the Mac, including all the 'specialist' ones.
If you are trying to decide whether to upgrade to a new PC or go the full hog and convert to a Mac just ask all the pople who have migrated from the PC to the Mac why, if the Mac userbase is less than 5% of all computer users is the response so favourable for the Mac and its OS? I don't see many people advocating moving to the PC after having been Mac users all their lives. Make sure you are comparing Operating Systems properly. The latest Mac OS is OS X and the Widoze one is, I believe Winows MX. I stand to be corrected though.