Data Input, Mark-sense using flatbed scanner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Data Input, Mark-sense using flatbed scanner
I am contemplating redoing a survey where I expect about 400 responses. Two years ago I input the data entirely by hand from the response papers. I would like to do the survey again, but I'm too lazy to capture the data by hand this time.
Can anyone suggest Win XP software which will capture mark-sense data from forms scanned in my flat-bed scanner? (free is best
)
I would go to my expert, who designed and built the scanners used in the 1960 and later US Censuses, except that he died about a year ago.
Thank you all,
seacue
Can anyone suggest Win XP software which will capture mark-sense data from forms scanned in my flat-bed scanner? (free is best
)I would go to my expert, who designed and built the scanners used in the 1960 and later US Censuses, except that he died about a year ago.
Thank you all,
seacue
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
For 400 I'd do it by hand (assuming there aren't too many questions, 20 say). Easier with two people, one reading one typing. Maybe I'm spoilt, the party machine can always find a person-afternoon of effort somewhere or other 
For much more than that I'd set up the survey online, let the punters do the data entry.
For much more than that I'd set up the survey online, let the punters do the data entry.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mr Wombat, (I think that's correct)
But a substantial fraction of the responders won't have a computer - I want to find that - or are barely computer-literate.
Requiring on-line entry would seriously bias the results.
Thanks for your comments.
seacue
But a substantial fraction of the responders won't have a computer - I want to find that - or are barely computer-literate.
Requiring on-line entry would seriously bias the results.
Thanks for your comments.
seacue
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But a substantial fraction of the responders won't have a computer - I want to find that - or are barely computer-literate.
Otherwise heavy-duty OCR made by the likes of Kofax or Visionshape is probably what you're after, preferably (but not necessarily if you're willing to put up with a trade-off on the speed/quality side of things) combined with a decent document scanner.
Or just make sure your forms are correctly designed for optimal high speed scanning and then outsource the post-processing, the latter being able to advise on the former. Depending on the nature of the forms, perhaps a company such as Popularis might suit (not a recommendation, just used by a company I deal with who I know have used them for a few years now).
Last edited by mixture; 11th Sep 2012 at 11:25.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should have researched there before asking this question, but Giggle has links to
queXF | An Open Source, web based paper form verification and data entry system
and
Udai Waterloo OMR tool
Can anyone comment on them?
seacue
queXF | An Open Source, web based paper form verification and data entry system
and
Udai Waterloo OMR tool
Can anyone comment on them?
seacue
Can anyone comment on them?
The prerequisites for queXF look a bit daunting for a non CS/IT person. Do you know mySQL, for example? Or even have it installed? I think you'd spend more time fiddling with the supporting s/w than just hand counting the results. If you had a lot of this sort of stuff to do, it might be worthwhile.
Udai: A crude and simple interface. Read the directions carefully, but if you can handle that its not overwhelming for most people with basic computer skills. It does seem to require a custom form, built with PowerPoint. If you've got that installed, and know it, good. If you already have a form built, this could be a stumbling block.
