More RAM
Thread Starter
Guest
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
More RAM
Just a follow-up to my post of a few weeks ago. I finally bought a two pack of matched RAM from Cr*cial, whipped out the old single 1Gb module, and installed the twin modules for 2Gb the day before yesterday. Difference in XP speed is quite startling. Cr*cial will examine your PC first over the 'net and sell you what fits, so no worries there.
To anyone who is thinking of increasing the RAM in their PC, I can only say "go ahead". The performance gain (big) versus cost (small) is well justified.
OFSO
To anyone who is thinking of increasing the RAM in their PC, I can only say "go ahead". The performance gain (big) versus cost (small) is well justified.
OFSO
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
Plus, if you aren't actually short of RAM, because you aren't using all that you've got already, adding more will make no difference to speed and is a complete waste of money. So check that first.
Controversial, moi?
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 22
From: UK
Plus, if you aren't actually short of RAM, because you aren't using all that you've got already, adding more will make no difference to speed and is a complete waste of money. So check that first.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: The Land of Beer and Chocolate
Well, Gertrude, I disagree.
Adding more RAM is always a cheap way of speeding up your PC because, simply, more ram means that less virtual memory will be used and as chip memory is faster and has faster access times than a harddisk has the overall PC speed increases..
Therefore, more ram = noticible increase in speed, whether you use "all" your ram or not!
Adding more RAM is always a cheap way of speeding up your PC because, simply, more ram means that less virtual memory will be used and as chip memory is faster and has faster access times than a harddisk has the overall PC speed increases..
Therefore, more ram = noticible increase in speed, whether you use "all" your ram or not!
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 78
Likes: 4
From: Brussel
Gertrude,
In my experience it sort of depends upon what you are doing.
I do a lot of image processing, 2.5Ghz Quad core m/c was bought with 4, went to 8 and finally 16Gb of RAM; quantum leaps in terms of number chunking every time. I am aware of the requirement of scratch disk space; I run two 500Gb drives as a RAID 0 array for fast seek/write times; with a maximum of 200GB of data to give large scratch disk volumes.
MM.
In my experience it sort of depends upon what you are doing.
I do a lot of image processing, 2.5Ghz Quad core m/c was bought with 4, went to 8 and finally 16Gb of RAM; quantum leaps in terms of number chunking every time. I am aware of the requirement of scratch disk space; I run two 500Gb drives as a RAID 0 array for fast seek/write times; with a maximum of 200GB of data to give large scratch disk volumes.
MM.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Well, Gertrude, I disagree.
Adding more RAM is always a cheap way of speeding up your PC because, simply, more ram means that less virtual memory will be used and as chip memory is faster and has faster access times than a harddisk has the overall PC speed increases..
Therefore, more ram = noticible increase in speed, whether you use "all" your ram or not!
Adding more RAM is always a cheap way of speeding up your PC because, simply, more ram means that less virtual memory will be used and as chip memory is faster and has faster access times than a harddisk has the overall PC speed increases..
Therefore, more ram = noticible increase in speed, whether you use "all" your ram or not!
Also, more RAM does NOT always mean that less virtual memory is used. A swapfile cannot easily be eradicated if you want to retain dump logs, and 32bit programs are limited themselves to a process size of 2Gb anyway.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Not sure about 32-bit Windows, but a 32-bit program can use up to 4GB of RAM in 64-bit Windows if you set the 4GB flag on the executable. Of course if the program is badly written then it will crash if you do set the flag.
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
Adding more RAM is always a cheap way of speeding up your PC because, simply, more ram means that less virtual memory will be used and as chip memory is faster and has faster access times than a harddisk has the overall PC speed increases.
If you have 2Gb physical RAM and you are using 1Gb total memory then buy more RAM won't make it go any faster, because you are already never using the disk for swapping.
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 78
Likes: 4
From: Brussel
I have to agree with Gertrude upon this latter point.
Often the bottleneck is the Bus speed/capability. Two parts of the m/c may crunch data at relatively high speeds but the 'motorway' that connects them will be the bottleneck, the Bus, L1 and L2 caches on lower grade m/cs may well be the limiting factors; thus read/write times and RAM level become irrelevant.
Often the bottleneck is the Bus speed/capability. Two parts of the m/c may crunch data at relatively high speeds but the 'motorway' that connects them will be the bottleneck, the Bus, L1 and L2 caches on lower grade m/cs may well be the limiting factors; thus read/write times and RAM level become irrelevant.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Chasing Dreams
Just to mildly hi-jack the thread...
I have 4Gb of RAM installed (motherboard max is 4Gb). Is it worth installing a 64 bit operating system rather than just upgrading my 32 bit system, knowing that I can't install any more RAM?
I have 4Gb of RAM installed (motherboard max is 4Gb). Is it worth installing a 64 bit operating system rather than just upgrading my 32 bit system, knowing that I can't install any more RAM?
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Check the section "System PTEs". It's 4Gb made up of 2Gb User and 2Gb Kernel.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Comparison of 32-bit and 64-bit memory architecture for 64-bit editions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003
Check the section "System PTEs". It's 4Gb made up of 2Gb User and 2Gb Kernel.
Check the section "System PTEs". It's 4Gb made up of 2Gb User and 2Gb Kernel.
Everything else I've read about the LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag says the same, that it allows you to use up to 4GB of RAM without the OS taking any of it... and the fact that some games crash when it's set tends to imply that's the real behaviour too
.
More bang for your buck
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 1
From: land of the clanger
If you have 2gigs at the moment the answer appears to be no.
Computer memory upgrades for Sony VAIO VGN-AR41M Laptop/Notebook from Crucial.com
Computer memory upgrades for Sony VAIO VGN-AR41M Laptop/Notebook from Crucial.com
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,700
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
Every computer that I have had has had a memory upgrade which has immediately boosted its performance.
Yes, you can probably manage your system so that it is not using the HDD for swap files but you will spend more time opening and closing applications. There are lots of programs that run services in the background and more RAM can only help.
I have a netbook that came with 1Gb on non-upgradeable RAM. I upgraded with a further 1Gb and it ran far sweeter. It seems the original RAM is not in a user accessible DIMM slot but the second slot was the same as on the laptop.
Yes, you can probably manage your system so that it is not using the HDD for swap files but you will spend more time opening and closing applications. There are lots of programs that run services in the background and more RAM can only help.
I have a netbook that came with 1Gb on non-upgradeable RAM. I upgraded with a further 1Gb and it ran far sweeter. It seems the original RAM is not in a user accessible DIMM slot but the second slot was the same as on the laptop.
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge, England, EU
Yes, you can probably manage your system so that it is not using the HDD for swap files but you will spend more time opening and closing applications.
On the other hand if you're in the habit of for example running Java applications, particularly if they use Swing, or doing video editing, then you're likely to benefit from all the memory you can add. (Or getting the Java stuff rewritten in a proper language, but that's a different argument.)
