Windows 7 Explorer Failures - Unsolvable for the last 17 months now.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Windows 7 Explorer Failures - Unsolvable for the last 17 months now.
This one's been around for as long as Windows 7 has been (all variants and versions), The symptoms vary between long-lasting hour glasses and an Explorer screen vanish (being replaced by a pop-up saying "Windows Explorer has failed, searching for a solution to this problem"). After a while it fades away and you can try to re-open Windows Explorer again, only to be subjected quite soonish to the same indignity.
It has (apparently) never been resolved by Microsoft and has all the characteristics of a vintage Win 98 stack overflow. If you GOOGLE the malady, you'll find literally hundreds of thousands of posts on the problem. They typically have claims of having found a solution, only to later post that they were mistaken - i.e. like Arnie Schwarz, "it's back".
I've got it on a server, a laptop and a desktop and it's really annoying. People talk about Vista's problems being a disincentive, however this beats the Vista vagaries hands down.
So if you haven't yet upgraded to Windows 7, I suggest you don't - if you value your sanity.
It has (apparently) never been resolved by Microsoft and has all the characteristics of a vintage Win 98 stack overflow. If you GOOGLE the malady, you'll find literally hundreds of thousands of posts on the problem. They typically have claims of having found a solution, only to later post that they were mistaken - i.e. like Arnie Schwarz, "it's back".
I've got it on a server, a laptop and a desktop and it's really annoying. People talk about Vista's problems being a disincentive, however this beats the Vista vagaries hands down.
So if you haven't yet upgraded to Windows 7, I suggest you don't - if you value your sanity.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have three PCs running Win 7 and am familiar with many more. None of them exhibit this problem - indeed, all are remarkably stable.
This suggests that your problem is specific. Can you provide more information of when it happens or is it truly random? Does it only happen when you select or right click a file or folder? If so, what type(s) of file? What anti-virus are you running?
Without any info, this is a real shot in the dark but my money would be on your graphics driver or a registry problem. The latter is easily sorted, the former a bit trickier.
This suggests that your problem is specific. Can you provide more information of when it happens or is it truly random? Does it only happen when you select or right click a file or folder? If so, what type(s) of file? What anti-virus are you running?
Without any info, this is a real shot in the dark but my money would be on your graphics driver or a registry problem. The latter is easily sorted, the former a bit trickier.
More bang for your buck
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have 2 M/Cs running 7 with no problems either.
You don't run 'Digital Vault' do you? as that was known to cause the problem in Vista. Otherwise what Simonta suggests.
You don't run 'Digital Vault' do you? as that was known to cause the problem in Vista. Otherwise what Simonta suggests.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No Identifiable Commonalities
Don't run Digital Vault and the software on each computer is different (except for different versions of the MS Office suite). ReadyBoost to a fast SD card has no effect (easily provable by removing/replacing the SD card).
Microsoft is definitely not taking this disabling anomaly seriously, despite the problem being widespread and long-standing. I've noted many opinions on forums that it's just classic MS arrogance. One thing I cannot understand is the ephemeral nature of this issue (i.e. some have it consistently, others intermittently and many others, not at all).
I've tried rebooting (rather than just hibernating) - but there's no apparent difference. Defragmenting makes no apparent difference, but I am also aware that the science of defragmentation has changed significantly. Diskeeper uses an intricate proprietary technology (based upon access stats), whereas Windows 7 defragmentation is based upon old school stuff (of just stacking files contiguously).
I've now diverted my attentions to finding the best alternative shell program (to Windows Explorer). Suggestions beyond Total Commander (also affected) would be welcome.
UNC
Edited to remark that the antivirus is intentionally different on each machine (Bitdefender, AVG and AVAST). There's also a Buffalo TeraStation NAS tied into the network.
Microsoft is definitely not taking this disabling anomaly seriously, despite the problem being widespread and long-standing. I've noted many opinions on forums that it's just classic MS arrogance. One thing I cannot understand is the ephemeral nature of this issue (i.e. some have it consistently, others intermittently and many others, not at all).
I've tried rebooting (rather than just hibernating) - but there's no apparent difference. Defragmenting makes no apparent difference, but I am also aware that the science of defragmentation has changed significantly. Diskeeper uses an intricate proprietary technology (based upon access stats), whereas Windows 7 defragmentation is based upon old school stuff (of just stacking files contiguously).
I've now diverted my attentions to finding the best alternative shell program (to Windows Explorer). Suggestions beyond Total Commander (also affected) would be welcome.
UNC
Edited to remark that the antivirus is intentionally different on each machine (Bitdefender, AVG and AVAST). There's also a Buffalo TeraStation NAS tied into the network.
Psychophysiological entity
Is total commander totally separate? i e do you not call on Explorer to use it? A couple of Goog oils seemed to imply it was just adding to the function of the MS File Explorer.
What are the demands on the system/CPU while it's thinking about working?
Have you got a machine that is not affected? I once swapped the explorer file for quite unrelated reasons.
What are the demands on the system/CPU while it's thinking about working?
Have you got a machine that is not affected? I once swapped the explorer file for quite unrelated reasons.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are the demands on the system/CPU while it's thinking about working? Negligible increase.
Have you got a machine that is not affected? No I haven't. They're all similarly affected on WIN7.
Same with any of my three antivirus programs ON or OFF.
Have you got a machine that is not affected? No I haven't. They're all similarly affected on WIN7.
Same with any of my three antivirus programs ON or OFF.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't happen to have any mapped drives to the Buffalo on each machine do you?
I would agree with the others here, this sounds not like an issue with W7 explorer, but rather an issue with something which is making explorer hang (waiting for something else to execute). My many W7 installs haven't exhibited the symptoms you suggest, despite me being familiar with the issues that cause them.
I would agree with the others here, this sounds not like an issue with W7 explorer, but rather an issue with something which is making explorer hang (waiting for something else to execute). My many W7 installs haven't exhibited the symptoms you suggest, despite me being familiar with the issues that cause them.
More bang for your buck
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Were they a clean install or an upgrade from Vista? If the latter I suggest you try a clean install on one of the M/Cs and see what happens also you could try running any old Apps in the XP mode, might help.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't happen to have any mapped drives to the Buffalo on each machine do you?
Yes and also Network Magic. But shutting them both down makes no difference.
All clean installations.
Yes and also Network Magic. But shutting them both down makes no difference.
All clean installations.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have many Windows 7 machines running at work and none of them manifests a problem with Explorer.
A classic cause of Explorer crashes is a buggy Explorer extension. Explorer extensions change the display of folders or items within folders. If these extensions are buggy, they can crash Explorer. Unfortunately, many software products install them, and some computers with pre-installed, "home-grown" versions of Windows may have such extensions in place, too.
Normally, such gadgets allow items in certain folders to be displayed in non-standard ways. For example, a folder containing pictures in a proprietary format could display thumbnails for those pictures with an extension. But since they live right inside Explorer, a program that is sorta-kinda part of the OS, they can crash this essential program if they fail. (This is one reason why I was never in favor of the Windows 95 Explorer being cloned into NT and its successors, but I guess it's too late now.)
Anyway, if you are getting Explorer crashes, you might try to find out if you have anything in the system that might try to display the contents of certain folders in a different way, or any other extensions to Explorer.
A classic cause of Explorer crashes is a buggy Explorer extension. Explorer extensions change the display of folders or items within folders. If these extensions are buggy, they can crash Explorer. Unfortunately, many software products install them, and some computers with pre-installed, "home-grown" versions of Windows may have such extensions in place, too.
Normally, such gadgets allow items in certain folders to be displayed in non-standard ways. For example, a folder containing pictures in a proprietary format could display thumbnails for those pictures with an extension. But since they live right inside Explorer, a program that is sorta-kinda part of the OS, they can crash this essential program if they fail. (This is one reason why I was never in favor of the Windows 95 Explorer being cloned into NT and its successors, but I guess it's too late now.)
Anyway, if you are getting Explorer crashes, you might try to find out if you have anything in the system that might try to display the contents of certain folders in a different way, or any other extensions to Explorer.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another classic issue is antivirus programs that install a firewall.
Get rid of these and go with Microsoft Security Essentials or an AV-only package, and use it with Windows Firewall.
Get rid of these and go with Microsoft Security Essentials or an AV-only package, and use it with Windows Firewall.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you are getting Explorer crashes, you might try to find out if you have anything in the system that might try to display the contents of certain folders in a different way, or any other extensions to Explorer.
What I do have is an extensive folder/sub-folder/sub-sub folder structure to segregate dissimilar subjects. However that identical nested tree structure was never a problem with Win 98, Win XP, Win Server 2003, Vista but Win 7 cannot cope.... (apparently).
Until such time as Microslop acknowledges and addresses this fundamental annoyance, my sincere recommendation would be to stick with Vista. A properly patched Vista gives few problems. Any hiccups normally clear up on a reboot.
Another classic issue is antivirus programs that install a firewall.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I do have is an extensive folder/sub-folder/sub-sub folder structure to segregate dissimilar subjects. However that identical nested tree structure was never a problem with Win 98, Win XP, Win Server 2003, Vista but Win 7 cannot cope.... (apparently).
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To add to Mike's post, the 255 limit has been there forever in 32bit Win. There is no difference in it's handling to XP or Vista. I've just tested a 255 path on 7 and it's just fine. Everything about your problem suggest it's not a Microsoft issue. You clearly know your way around Windows. I would suggest that a methodical troubleshooting approach will find the problem.
PS. Subst is an easy workaround for the 255 limit.
PPS. The childish "Microslop" type comments are not going to be helpful in getting folks to try to help. If .001% of Windows users have an issue with something, then you will find 1000's of posts from people screaming about how Microsoft need to do something. They usually do not.
PS. Subst is an easy workaround for the 255 limit.
PPS. The childish "Microslop" type comments are not going to be helpful in getting folks to try to help. If .001% of Windows users have an issue with something, then you will find 1000's of posts from people screaming about how Microsoft need to do something. They usually do not.
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Four Win 7 PCs that I use regularly are free of this problem.
From the way the complaint is written, I take it there is no information about the problem in the Event Log. I've had problems with peripherals, and found the logs provided what was needed to sort them.
From the way the complaint is written, I take it there is no information about the problem in the Event Log. I've had problems with peripherals, and found the logs provided what was needed to sort them.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm unaware of any such Explorer shell "extensions". For example I've not added any proprietary right-click "open-withs" and my preview for any jpg/gif/png graphics is bog standard "as she came".
I have a mix of straight retail Windows 7 installations and hokey HP OEM installations, the latter clogged with metric tons of garbage bloatware upon delivery. Neither has had Explorer crashes, though. I did manage to remove most of the HP garbage, although it's difficult and HP messes up some system parameters, too. I would have still preferred XP, but it's hard to find XP these days for new machines.
Which desktop appearance are you using? Have you tried Windows Classic? It makes fewer demands on video hardware and software and runs faster, in addition to (possibly) being less likely to expose bugs in a video driver or something like that.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the identical Issue
Event viewer is choc-a-bloc with slight variations on the following cut and paste error message (all concerning Windows Explorer in W7):
and of course NOTHING comes up under this:
Faulting application name: Explorer.EXE, version: 6.1.7600.16450, time stamp: 0x4aeba271
Faulting module name: EXPLORERFRAME.dll, version: 6.1.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bda55
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x0001a256
Faulting process id: 0x7a0
Faulting application start time: 0x01cb50d00e1523a1
Faulting application path: C
Windows\Explorer.EXE
Faulting module path: CWindows\system32\EXPLORERFRAME.dll
Report Id: c27ce8f8-bcc3-11df-b746-a4badbcedda4
This application caused a delay in the system shutdown process:
File Name : explorer.exe
Friendly Name : Windows Explorer
Version : 6.1.7600.16385 (win7_rtm.090713-1255)
Total Time : 5389ms
Degradation Time : 1075ms
Incident Time (UTC) : 2010-09-10T09:10:48.513502900Z
Faulting module name: EXPLORERFRAME.dll, version: 6.1.7600.16385, time stamp: 0x4a5bda55
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Fault offset: 0x0001a256
Faulting process id: 0x7a0
Faulting application start time: 0x01cb50d00e1523a1
Faulting application path: C
Windows\Explorer.EXEFaulting module path: C
Windows\system32\EXPLORERFRAME.dllReport Id: c27ce8f8-bcc3-11df-b746-a4badbcedda4
This application caused a delay in the system shutdown process:
File Name : explorer.exe
Friendly Name : Windows Explorer
Version : 6.1.7600.16385 (win7_rtm.090713-1255)
Total Time : 5389ms
Degradation Time : 1075ms
Incident Time (UTC) : 2010-09-10T09:10:48.513502900Z
To check for solutions to problems using Control Panel
1.
Open Problem Reports and Solutions by clicking the Start button Picture of the Start button, clicking Control Panel, clicking System and Maintenance, and then clicking Problem Reports and Solutions.
2.
Click Check for new solutions.
Windows will notify you if there are any steps you can take to solve problems on your computer.
1.
Open Problem Reports and Solutions by clicking the Start button Picture of the Start button, clicking Control Panel, clicking System and Maintenance, and then clicking Problem Reports and Solutions.
2.
Click Check for new solutions.
Windows will notify you if there are any steps you can take to solve problems on your computer.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Themes make nil difference.
Don't use AERO
Just had another instance of it failing:-
"Windows Explorer has stopped working. Looking for a solution to the problem."
"Windows is restarting Windows Explorer"
Don't use AERO
Just had another instance of it failing:-
"Windows Explorer has stopped working. Looking for a solution to the problem."
"Windows is restarting Windows Explorer"
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unctious - from your posts I guess you are familiar, but just in case - using Event Viewer:
Use Windows 7 Event Viewer to track down issues that cause slower boot times | Microsoft Windows | TechRepublic.com
Use Windows 7 Event Viewer to track down issues that cause slower boot times | Microsoft Windows | TechRepublic.com