Wikiposts
Search
Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting Anyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. NOT FOR REPORTING ISSUES WITH PPRuNe FORUMS! Please use the subforum "PPRuNe Problems or Queries."

Ruminations on printer ink

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jun 2010, 10:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian title
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: is everything
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ruminations on printer ink

I just commissioned a very, very expensive printer. Poring over the instructions, I'm initially confused by, well, many things.

FIrstly, the beast takes HP ink cartridges. Well, I think, that can't keep the running costs down, I mean it's a 400 kg printer.

Secondly, it confusingly has very large ink tanks that are fed from even larger containers.

Thirdly, it wants a black HP ink cartridge in each color printhead slot. I'm not reading the instructions in my native language, so it takes me about 30 minutes to get my head around that bit. Imagine Ozzy Osbourne, Printer Repair Man. Anyway, since there are only black ink cartridges in the box, I finally guess it must be true.

Dubiously pressing the "load" button provokes the machine into an orgy of cartridge vandalization: it sucks all the black ink out of the cartridges, stuffs violently pointy things into them, then flushes them through with colored ink.

I don't know whether to weep at the unceremonious dumping of so much HP gold, or to ululate wildly shouting "take that, you HP ink cartridge you."

Anyway, we all stand looking at the printer thinking you wouldn't want to make it unhappy. I mean, if it will do that to get a print head...
Bushfiva is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 11:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 400kg printer taking HP ink cartridges ?

I know digipresses take oversized toner carts and normal presses use ink drums..... but HP ink carts ?

Maybe it's just your wording... but one is awfully confused.
mixture is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 11:16
  #3 (permalink)  
Hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian title
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: is everything
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
400 kg. HP ink carts.
Bushfiva is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 11:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm...most enligtening answer, thanks Bushfiva.

Well, I'll leave you to it...... and hope you took out a maintenance contract from the people you bought it from.

Good luck.
mixture is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 12:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never Ever Buy An Epson Inkjet

Canon, HP and Brother inkjets, even Lexmark inkjets are reliable printers, even though of quite dissimilar performance.

However because EPSON inkjet printers are so unreliable they are best steered clear of. Go away on a four week holiday and the printheads dry up. You'd be lucky to ever clear them. New printheads cost as much as a printer. Six to seven weeks without use and they are DEAD DEAD DEAD.

I've wasted over a $1000 on EPSON printers, mainly because when they're working they perform well, although they only use 80% of the ink in a cartridge before the automatic chip in each cartridge says it's empty. The chips in the cartridges on the older EPSONS used to be able to be reset and the cartridge refilled. Now EPSON has made them unresettable so you can only utilise their expensive cartridges.

I've resolved NEVER to EVER buy another EPSON printer (inkjet or not) and I'll never bypass an opportunity to educate the rest of the world about what a rip-off the EPSON brand is. EPSON is the only inkjet that suffers from this printhead clogging malady. All the others have found a way around it, including incorporating the printhead in the cartridge itself.
TheShadow is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 12:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So go on, having teased us with a bit of description, what model printer is it?
cats_five is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 12:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheShadow
Canon, HP and Brother inkjets, even Lexmark inkjets are reliable printers, even though of quite dissimilar performance.

However because EPSON inkjet printers are so unreliable they are best steered clear of. Go away on a four week holiday and the printheads dry up. You'd be lucky to ever clear them. New printheads cost as much as a printer. Six to seven weeks without use and they are DEAD DEAD DEAD.

I've wasted over a $1000 on EPSON printers, mainly because when they're working they perform well, although they only use 80% of the ink in a cartridge before the automatic chip in each cartridge says it's empty. The chips in the cartridges on the older EPSONS used to be able to be reset and the cartridge refilled. Now EPSON has made them unresettable so you can only utilise their expensive cartridges.

I've resolved NEVER to EVER buy another EPSON printer (inkjet or not) and I'll never bypass an opportunity to educate the rest of the world about what a rip-off the EPSON brand is. EPSON is the only inkjet that suffers from this printhead clogging malady. All the others have found a way around it, including incorporating the printhead in the cartridge itself.
Seconded!!
call100 is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 18:06
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not too long ago on this forum I asked for comments/advice as to what to replace my ancient trusty Epson 925 colour printer with. The consensus was to acquire a Canon Pixma iP4700. I thus acquired one of these together with the refillable cartridges which make a refill cost about 40p in ink.
Since that time I have been totally delighted with it compared to my old Epson. Ink jets rarely if ever clog. Colour prints are superb, automatic two side printing is also possible and it is even possible to print on CDs.
Ink jet printing has certainly come a long way since I acquired by old Epson. I have also obtained a Brother one for my wife and a friend. They are also impressive units, and their (third party) ink refills are reasonably priced as well. Even then Brother cartridges do not appear to be the rip-off that some other manufacturers ones are.

P.P.
P.Pilcher is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2010, 20:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: manchester
Age: 70
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Epson? Crap.
al446 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2010, 21:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Age: 62
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bushfiva

It's been a while since I had to do this sort of stuff. I took a woeful colour laser and assigned it to non-production duty and bought two very expensive machines to replace it - which subsequently malfunctioned.

As part of the transaction, though, we were given on-site support at any time we wanted it. Once they'd replaced them a few times with newer models and I'd made some death threats, we had a functioning site with redundancy. I must draw into question the wisdom of putting all one's eggs into one basket - but it's your show.

It might be worth your while to track down your salesweasel and obtain some after-sales support. Did you sign off on this? I suspect that you didn't.

SO
sea oxen is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.