Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

India court grounds 'fat' flight attendants

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

India court grounds 'fat' flight attendants

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jun 2008, 15:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
India court grounds 'fat' flight attendants

An Indian court has upheld the right of state-owned Air India to ground overweight flight attendants, a report said.

Lawyers for the airline told the court the attendants were moved from flight duty to ground duty when they failed to meet minimum physical fitness standards, the Hindu newspaper reported.

The Delhi High Court said the attendants' contracts stipulated their jobs could be terminated if they put on too much weight, according to the paper.

The bench, made up of Justice AK Sikri and Justice JR Midha, said the state-run airline needed fit flight attendants to compete with private rivals in India's fiercely competitive aviation market.

The entry of private airlines in the business has resulted in severe competition," the judges said in their ruling."

The airline "has to meet this challenge by ensuring that its air hostesses and cabin crew members remained physically fit."


"There has been much debate about skinny bodies vis-a-vis healthy bodies, but there is no scope for any debate on overweight people," the judges added.

"It is universally accepted that overweight people have tendency to suffer from diseases," the judges said.

- AFP

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ABC NEWS
Shapeshifter is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 15:31
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
India court grounds 'fat' flight attendants

India court grounds 'fat' flight attendants


An Indian court has upheld the right of state-owned Air India to ground overweight flight attendants, a report said.

Lawyers for the airline told the court the attendants were moved from flight duty to ground duty when they failed to meet minimum physical fitness standards, the Hindu newspaper reported.

The Delhi High Court said the attendants' contracts stipulated their jobs could be terminated if they put on too much weight, according to the paper.

The bench, made up of Justice AK Sikri and Justice JR Midha, said the state-run airline needed fit flight attendants to compete with private rivals in India's fiercely competitive aviation market.

"The entry of private airlines in the business has resulted in severe competition," the judges said in their ruling.

The airline "has to meet this challenge by ensuring that its air hostesses and cabin crew members remained physically fit."


"There has been much debate about skinny bodies vis-a-vis healthy bodies, but there is no scope for any debate on overweight people," the judges added.

"It is universally accepted that overweight people have tendency to suffer from diseases," the judges said.

- AFP

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ABC NEWS
Shapeshifter is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 15:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: london
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a backward way of thinking and dealing with overweight cabin crew.

Reminds me of the 1960's and 70's where it was all about image.
monkeybusiness2 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 17:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: derbyshire
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does seem a bit outdated. I've worked with some proper skinny bints in my time, and I'd be concerned about half of them being able to access liferafts, etc. And the other half would be worried about breaking a nail.....

And no, I am not some overweight bifter with a 'jealousy complex' (before anyone jumps down my throat...) - I am a healthy 9 and a half stone, 5ft 7inch tall biatch.

sillymoo is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 19:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe airlines in the ME are like this still-obsessed with appearance etc. How sad!

Yes as crew we need to take care of ourselves but still.

The 'Singapore Girls' are an example of this. Beautiful, lovely ladies but so petite and fragile...and servile.

Thank God I live in a country where they don't weigh you before flights, check your skin and tell you to lose weight!
Virginia is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 19:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: At home
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm...

Reckon this should also apply for tech crew??



BJ
basementjaxx is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 20:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Old Street Station
Age: 46
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And yet, most of the girls in the ME are very beautiful!
Londonlads is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 21:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Down there
Posts: 315
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Should also be the rule here in Oz, including no male F/As
Jenna Talia is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 21:33
  #9 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disagree just a tad, no offense intended.
I guess it depends on what you consider the scope of our job is.

To me we are safety and service professionals. Who I believe should be physically able to carry out all emergency procedures plus being able to walk down the aisle without hitting the pax. I also believe we should look well groomed and if at all possible, just a tiny little bit glam.

If I could decide, both anorectic and obese colleagues would be grounded and coached to make healthier life-style choices. Thereby helping them to return to being fit for flight and fit to look at.

and please note, I did NOT say we need to be beautiful! I said well groomed & fit enough for both cabin and safety duties.
Juud is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 23:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cuckooooooo Land
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
India leading the way....

Spot on! Good on 'em!! Well done! Bring on the glamours!
chickendrummer is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 23:25
  #11 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,442
Received 227 Likes on 121 Posts
You have to love their Honour's soundly based legal reasoning:

"It is universally accepted that overweight people have tendency to suffer from diseases," the judges said.
tail wheel is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2008, 23:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: About
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about bad attitudes?

Do you think we could get a ruling on the middle aged bad tempered things that grace QF international flights who told me the light above my head was for emergencies only?

You see 2 of them at the back of the plane most of the flight talking rubbish while the 3 or 4 junior staff slave thier guts out with no help at all. Why don't they just go gracefully instead of making everyones life miserable. Pax and staff.
crank1000 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 04:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Over the hill and far away
Age: 76
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If fuel costs keep going up, they'll be grounding over-weight pax next.
kenhughes is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 04:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
basement,

Tech crew are subject to yearly medicals.

Any overweight tech crew are behind the eight ball when it comes to a stress ecg due to their poor body mass index (bmi). So they could be weeded out i.e. not keep their licence. Flight attendants are not subject to the same stringent annual medical testing.
Autobrakes4 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 06:48
  #15 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you think we could get a ruling on the middle aged bad tempered things that grace QF international flights who told me the light above my head was for emergencies only?

You see 2 of them at the back of the plane most of the flight talking rubbish while the 3 or 4 junior staff slave thier guts out with no help at all. Why don't they just go gracefully instead of making everyones life miserable.
Of course crank it didn't have anything to do with another pax complaining about you reading all night when they are trying to sleep either! NOooooo that wouldn't be it would it?

Why else would a cabin crew care about you reading?
and as for standing around the back while others worked Yeah right!
Did you happen to walk down to the back and listen to hear what they were talking about?
Nope,this sounds more like a gripe about a knock back or not getting an upgrade to me.
RedTBar is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 08:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: tassie
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should mass produce the "cardboard cut out" and send it to india, i'd make a fortune.......

no use for it here in aus, i think even one of them(alot of new cabin crew these days) may have even eaten it

maybe i'll work in india..................

also i agree when jenna talia...please no more male FA's...I even saw one the other day covered in make up..pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

ok..standing by.....incoming......
Muff Hunter is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 09:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 133*50 23*50
Posts: 163
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the impression ive got from my dealings with indians, they much prefer a heftier girl. shows wealth or some such. maybe this is all about safety concerns, im sure there are sizes that dont fit an emergency exit.
Mail-man is online now  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 12:36
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 170 Likes on 87 Posts
What a mob of porkers! Kingfisher Airliners. Yuk!

And again here...
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 15:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia.
Posts: 308
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right, so if the female cabin crew aren't thin enough to induce a fat between the legs of the male passengers, they're considered unsuitable.

So what about all the slim beauties that smoke cigarettes...

"It is universally accepted that smokers have tendency to suffer from diseases," the judges said.

Perhaps they should be moved to an office job too.
Blip is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2008, 15:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: uk
Age: 43
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its true about the middle east- if you have acne they can put you on cosmetic leave and if you have cold sores they can also put you on cosmetic leave. Weight is also a big issue- you can get reported if your uniform is too tight and you have to report to the grooming officer who weighs you and tells you to loose weight within a certain amount of time. Appearance is very important in the middle-east- well the airline I worked for anyway!
main15 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.