Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Cabin Crew
Reload this Page >

Poor Cabin Crew

Wikiposts
Search
Cabin Crew Where professional flight attendants discuss matters that affect our jobs & lives.

Poor Cabin Crew

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2004, 18:09
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ROY HUD

RE : ROY HUD


Very funny mate !
Cabin crew don't realise the state of the potable water tanks !!!!!!!
GIANNI is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 19:32
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a hostie who is lucky if she clears £1,200 pm LET ALONE £1,800, may I just say that I agree with pilotwolf. We will never get paid the sort of wages that we think we deserve in terms of hours, fatigue or even hard graft - I'm sure the aviation industry is not exclusive to that fact.

It's a shame that one shallow hostie's comments about being unable to survive on a bl**dy good monthly wage has sparked such a heated and offensive debate. No, it's not right that as a highly skilled engineer with years of training you are being paid less than the cabin crew, but is that really a call to belittle us and negate the job description that we fill?

I'm sure that said hostie's comments have infuriated you and highlighted an issue that you feel should be addressed, but shouldn't these pay issues be taken up with your employers?

And GIANNI, what a professional response. Aren't they the same tanks we use to make YOUR tea?
KTPops is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 20:46
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What you fail to mention is that out of that £1800 , they may well have downroute expenses of approx £300 .

I don't believe that engineers should be paid badly, but having visited a vast BA hangar the other day, no-one there was in a hurry to do anything fast.

The role of cabin crew can be very demanding , and you do get alot of verbal from our lovely customers.

Besides ,if any BA engineer feels they are missing out on something, they are MORE than welcome to apply internally for cabin crew
Believe me , it does happen!
Anti-ice is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 21:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Europe most of the time
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

chicken or beef?
Interconti is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2004, 21:11
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UAE
Age: 44
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi!

Every so often someone coplains about cc pay. Leave your job and apply to be one if you aint happy!

Oh and the pilot/engineer/cabin crew/management pay argument can can be found here,

http://pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?threadid=124412

not sure how to link it but if you copy and paste you can read the 20 odd pages of it!!

kempus

oh! well there you go! bet it was an engineer that came up with that!
Kempus is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 02:49
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: singapore
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Doggie ears, whats your job worth in India? The Aussie trolley dollies are taking industrial action to prevent the beginings of outsourcing. Good luck to them. If the bean counters have their way, all in flt announcements will begin with "Namasteh!".
BYOD is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 13:50
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bora Bora
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone else remember the occasion when the first officer on a BA flight was rescued by the cabin crew, when the window blew off on a particular 737? Maybe we should ask the pilots on that flight if we are overpaid, or if the engineers deserve their pay? HO HUM!
Calle Belle is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 15:37
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manchester
Age: 68
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which just goes to prove my point as the person certifying that windsreen job was in fact a manager who had been sat behind a desk for 10 years and only came out from behind it bacause the engineers at LHR where on strike to improve their conditions, unfortunately it resulted in a pilot nearly being killed.
So again are you happy flying around in an aircraft maintained by unhappy engineers who if conditions don't improve will more than likely leave the industry to fix the cabin crews BMW's, leaving the aircraft in the hands of managers or newly qualified engineers?
Will someone please answer the question?
tewkesbury is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 16:24
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course, but please answer mine first:
who do the unhappy engineers expect will fight their battle for pay rise?

We sympathize, we are on your side, but what do you expect from us? Want us to demand a pay cut to raise the engineers pay? Well, after you so graciously came here telling us we don't deserve our salary, we are really tempted, honest.
flyblue is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 17:39
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Isle Of Man
Age: 44
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tewkesbury,

unfortunatly, reason has nothing in common with airlines.
The book bashers sitting in an office are making the decisions, and not for the safe and well being of aviation employees, or pax, it sucks but its the way it is.

the industry is such that CC are getting paid better than a lot of brand new pilots, engineers, etc.

Is it scary that Engineers are not happy in there job... of course, is it scarier that companies are putting F/O's in the right seat with only 200 flying hours... and are the accountants going to listen until one of our beloved aircraft goes down due pilot/mechanical failure....NO,

It is a sad fact but this industry is F###ed up at the moment and doesnt seem to be in a hurry to sort itself out.
sam white is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2004, 17:40
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bora Bora
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flyblue...I could not agree more! Fight your own battles..and if your union is not strong enough..do something about i! Rise to our level..dont let us come down to your own! SORRY!
Calle Belle is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2004, 10:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Over 250 posts so far. Perhaps I support Pprune by posting regularly.
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I don't think anyone actually thinks you might really lower your conditions (at airlines where hosty pay is ridiculously high, I know this isn't the case at all airlines). You've got it, you might as well hang onto it. And why not?

But in all honesty, how about YOU answer THIS question:

Taking into account qualifications, training and the ease of replacement of crew, do you really think the job demands the high salary?

Or look at it this way... if you were an impartial arbitrator in charge of dictating salary levels for a new airline, could you honestly look the staff in the eye and tell them you were going to pay the hosties more than the engineers?

Be honest.

If yes, I'd be interested to see the "justification" without resorting to slanging, threats of banning, coffee-tampering, etc.
itchybum is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2004, 20:20
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure there is any justification, but if it's a mere question of higher qualifications/training = higher salary, why is it that a lot of major airlines worldwide pay their F/As more than the engineers and in some cases F/Os? Does this not say a lot about how highly (or lowly) rated the engineers/F/Os actually are by the companies for which they work?
jerrystinger is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2004, 09:43
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Honestly, taking into account my qualifications, personal qualities, experience and continuous training, I feel I am definitely underpaid (but happy nonetheless on the whole).
if you were an impartial arbitrator in charge of dictating salary levels for a new airline, could you honestly look the staff in the eye and tell them you were going to pay the hosties more than the engineers?
It doesn't work this way, and nothing of the sort would ever happen: YOU as a cathegory have to negotiate your salary. If your salary is what it is, you have no one to blame than yourselves. Especially not Flight Attendants.
flyblue is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2004, 19:40
  #35 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr tewkesbury, you write that your whinge is not about cabincrew but about the broader picture of a reduction in Maintenance Standards on aircraft. A worthy concern, and one which all of us in the industry most decidedly share with you if such a reduction can be proven to exist. Is there anything substantial you would like to share with us here? Some proof, something you see happening daily? I would be very interested to hear from you on that. As you so rightly point out, proper maintance is a matter of the gravest concern for all of us. self centred cabin crew or not.

Sharing your concern the way I do, and not doubting your motives for a second, I am somewhat mystified that you should voice your concern on the Cabin Crew forum. Since, according to your good self, your whinge is not about Cabincrew why have you chosen to unburden yourself on this particular foum? Would not your very valid concern for a percieved dropping of maintenance standards have reached a larger and more useful audience on a more widely read PPRuNe forum?
What exactly lead you to our humble Cabin crew forum if I may ask?

Oh and about ever disilusioned ; I do so sympathise.
Again a trend shared by many of us in the industry.
Small example; the company whose uniform I have proudly worn for most of my working life has just been sold wing, flap and rivet to the mob that employs Flyblue.
Am I disillusioned?
You bet!
Do I blame the folks at the cleverly run company that bought us or do I blame our own weaselfaced top management?

Mr tewkesbury, you only get one guess.
flapsforty is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2004, 07:44
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am pleased for anyone who can get a decent wage out of the airlines. It doesn't matter what the position is.

I have to admit, however, it is a bit hard on the new flight deck crew who have to live on about £20,000 a year before tax etc and pay back the loans that they had to take out to get where they are now. It is very tough for them to make ends meet, so often get into more debt.


xx
aaaaa is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2004, 17:47
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To slightly set the balance right, can I just point out that I joined BA in 1998, on the "new pay scale" and , working long-haul out of LGW, was lucky to take home £1100 a month. We just didn't get the lucrative destinations of LHR, and those we did have -- all one of them -- went not long after I joined. So the formula BA Cabin Crew = Terrific Pay baffles me.
I know that's not what this thread is primarily about, but hope that might put a bit more perspective on the debate.
Honeytruck is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2004, 22:31
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MY GOD! I thought an aircraft was meant to be a team thing! Obviously depends upon the airline with you are employed.
If you need to criticise any group in the industry, why not attack the cleaners? caterers? accountants? I'm sure some of them earn more $s than you do, but then again they perform tasks that you may not wish to perform.
It's that whole thing called division of (skilled) labour, and obviously your skills are with the inanimate parts of the aircraft, and not relating to the SLF.
Rabid Dog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.