PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. (https://www.pprune.org/biz-jets-ag-flying-ga-etc-36/)
-   -   Blink (https://www.pprune.org/biz-jets-ag-flying-ga-etc/316082-blink.html)

Flintstone 2nd Oct 2008 11:24


Originally Posted by flynowpaylater
And we all know that to assume makes an ASS of U and ME.

Yep. Assumptions will often come back and bite you in the arse though I'm not sure the 'ME' applies here......



Originally Posted by flynowpaylater
Yes they have employed pilot's (sic), who no doubt funded there(sic) own training...


Originally Posted by Flintstone
The company paid for the type ratings.


Originally Posted by flynowpaylater
As I said in the previous post, I couldn't be bothered to look back through the myriad of posts on this thread, and therefore by definition the figure of 20 A/C was a guess, and totally unsubstantiated.

Should have re-read the thread and not ASS U med eh? ;)

flynowpaylater 2nd Oct 2008 12:00

Thanks for the English lesson Flintstone.

One for you though....assume - to take for granted, suppose.
In writing my post, I never assumed anything, and nor should you have in reading it.
You assumed that I had assumed.

No reply required!

Flintstone 2nd Oct 2008 15:23

No reply required? Au contraire mon brave. Clearly the fault lies in my technique but as a good instructor should be able to explain a lesson in a variety of ways to accomodate even the slowest student we can go through it again. It's no bother, really.




Originally Posted by flynowpaylater
Yes they have employed pilot's (sic), who no doubt funded there(sic) own training...

Oxford English Dictionary says:

"assume

• verb 1 accept as true without proof."


You didn't check with Blink or their pilots to obtain proof, ergo you ASSumed.




Originally Posted by flynowpaylater
...by definition the figure of 20 A/C was a guess, and totally unsubstantiated

Oxford English Dictionary again:

"guess

• verb 1 estimate or suppose (something) without sufficient information to be sure of being correct"


Sounds like more assumption to me but hey, you carry on.

Phil Brockwell 2nd Oct 2008 15:36

Ahhhh, the old Collins vs Oxford Dictionary debate old boy .....this one could run!

flynowpaylater 2nd Oct 2008 15:52

Flintstone - LOL!:D

I assume you are not a pilot as pilots are rarely that amusing. *
I guess you are not a pilot as pilots are rarely that amusing. *

* Delete as appropriate .

As Phil point's out, there is a discrepancy between Collins and Oxford on the definition of assume. Been fun, but I have work to do.

Flintstone 2nd Oct 2008 16:21



Collins Dictionary.

"assume

VB

1 to take to be true without proof"


Feel free to keep going if you want.


http://www.raincatcher.org.uk/images/kp3.jpg


I'm bored watching you dig though ;)

Martin Barnes 2nd Oct 2008 19:53

and they all lived " happy ever after"
phil one of your satisfied pilots "must be jc"

Phil Brockwell 2nd Oct 2008 21:23

No, JC has been here too long to still be satisfied, must be one of the new guys, we probably don't know his name yet!

dingbat2407 3rd Oct 2008 08:18

Just for the record Phil I was never making those comments about you in my last post, I respect your position and opinion. My comments were more broadly directed at the general feeling of bitchiness we have started to see not just on this thread but on pprune in general.

Flintstone 22nd Apr 2009 21:00

But ........... what?

Quietly peddling their wares in a calm and professional fashion as far as I can tell.

shed loads 22nd Apr 2009 21:51

Training at Cambridge last Saturday.

tommoutrie 23rd Apr 2009 11:39

They're definitely working quite a lot and I've only heard very positive feedback about their operation. I believe they either just have had or are just about to have their AOC issued (been operating under TAG's I think) and that may well be the trigger point for them to ramp up the profile. I wish them every bit of success and, if any blinks are reading this, we have a ground power unit at the bush now which you can use for a price which will be related to how desperately you need it...

Tom

Grecian2000 23rd Apr 2009 14:28

Low profile?
 
From my little experience I'd say Blink have a much higher profile than most of their competitors.

What other small jet operator has had half the column inches or quotes written about them in the quality press? Cant think of any/many at all.

Blink have clearly invested in their brand and a have a belief in the value of a new product and a high quality business model.

Profile looks good to me, I say good luck to them in the current market, our industry needs (and benefits from) people like them who are prepared to invest in quality and are prepared to innovate.

Wishing them, and every other quality operator the best of luck in these testing times.

dingbat2407 24th Apr 2009 09:22

"Training in Cambridge"

Does this mean they have just had a type rating course go through?

onhmss 30th Apr 2009 17:03

recruiting combined cp and d/o
 
I hear they are looking for cp and do in one. ASAP is the requirement's timeframe. Any pprunners out there work for blink ? It would be great to get a pm and hear the facts, please. Tks.

Highflight420 2nd May 2009 16:57

This is a company which is indeed going about their business quietly efficiently and with an airline inspired ethos.

The three original British Airways pilots that have establised the flight Ops side of the business are quite simply outstanding in what they have achieved in such a short time added to which they are the nicest group of pilots you could hope to meet. Pilot force now exceeds 10 of which everyone of them and the growing ops department are superb individuals who are a delight to work with.

The two principal founders still incredibly young to have set up such a professional outfit continue to drive the business with incredible enthusiasm and their own vision of where it will be in the next few years.

I salute all and everyone at Blink for and incredible achievment in these very tough economic times.

hunterboy 2nd May 2009 17:52

I can second Highflights comments. They are a good bunch of guys. let's hope nice guys finish first.

Highflight420 3rd May 2009 10:43

Flatspin,

That's not for me to answer and even if I knew i wouldn't be posting on here, but there here still after 12months of operations and the aircraft are all flying so if you ask me I think there is a very good chance they are heading in the right direction.

Phil Brockwell 5th May 2009 14:06

Not doing a lot of flying hours(in comparison to their published targets) if my occasional browsing of CFMU is anything to go by, but many others aren't either, but as Highflight says they are still in business, so haven't lost the 30 million they raised yet.

flynowpaylater 6th May 2009 15:01

Freddy Laker was a thoroughly nice fellow, and decent chap to work for.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:12.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.