SCL-AKL feasible with any long-range business jets?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Chile
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SCL-AKL feasible with any long-range business jets?
SCL-AKL is one of the most challenging routes in the world in terms of ETOPS needs. LATAM flies it non-stop on a most-direct routing with some very high ETOPS rating (>>180min). There is a longer non-stop routing staying a bit north that keeps you within range of IPC and PPT and probably can be just accomplished within ETOPS 180.
Questions:
- Do any long-range business jets available for charter have >180min ETOPS?
- Which business jets have the range to do this route west-bound non-stop with 6-8 people and luggage?
- and_a_dog
Questions:
- Do any long-range business jets available for charter have >180min ETOPS?
- Which business jets have the range to do this route west-bound non-stop with 6-8 people and luggage?
- and_a_dog
The new Global 7500...
It can indeed - this is using SCIP NTTO NTAA NSTU NFFN as enroute ETPS (180min at approx 390 KTAS) - plenty of room for pax and bags AND arrive with 6000lbs fuel (which is A LOT!)
Current flight time is approx 14.5 hours at M0.85.
It'll cost ya, though!
Current flight time is approx 14.5 hours at M0.85.
It'll cost ya, though!
GC dist is approx 5220nm - staying within the ETOPS rings adds another 1000nm or so...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A Falcon 8X should be able to do it, maybe also a 7X.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Chile
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all. Hoping it won't become necessary for the situation I'm monitoring if LATAM resumes SCL-AKL in early 2021. (It would be *costly* as josephfeatherweight points out!) But, good to know it seems feasible with a reasonably available jet (Falcon), not just hypothetical. -aad
They also can stop in Easter Island/Isla de pascua/Rapa Nui - I did this last year and we had a nice 5:30 trip as the first leg
You can usually qualify for non-ETOPs EROPs with 2 engines out to 180 minutes, but 3 engines, 4 engines or 5 engines, if your cabin depressurises approaching your final ETP/CP and you're heading for a remote airport or Island destination, you're probably going to wish you had less engines.
As a Commercial Op, you'd plan for this scenario. Part 91, you just keep your fingers crossed.
As a Commercial Op, you'd plan for this scenario. Part 91, you just keep your fingers crossed.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty sure ETOPS has no application to FAR Part 91, and only would apply to FAR Part 135 in excess of 180+ minutes. A little different than FAR Part 121. Good operating practices would dictate operational planing that would not expose you to either a EO or Decompression scenario regardless of regulatory oversight.
Absolutely - you're not allowed to run out of fuel whilst depressurised and tracking to an ETP - it's just that in the Part 91 case (NAA dependent) that ETP is not constrained to be within 180 mins.