Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Will Gulfstream regain Longest range Jet Title

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Will Gulfstream regain Longest range Jet Title

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2018, 13:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oz
Posts: 905
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Will Gulfstream regain Longest range Jet Title

Now that the Global 7000 has taken the crown as the longest range corporate jet at 7700nm. One wonders what the response from Gulfstream will be. Is there going to be a re-engined G650ER with Rolls Royce Pearl engines as has been talked about, or a stretched 600 with a bigger wing with the name G700.

is the Rolls Royce Pearl a better more fuel efficient engine that the PW815 as used on the G600. It seems a given that the wing design off the 600 and the avionics architecture will be used in any future variants.

Thoughts anyone?
nomorecatering is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2018, 15:22
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK. East Mids.
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nomorecatering
Thoughts anyone?
My immediate thought is "no thank you" to any longer range than is already available.

The legs being put on jets are getting too much for humans to cope with in regards to crews. Especially when the ability to rest is given as an "option".

But, invariably, GS will want the crown back and come up with one of the variations mentioned.
Tray Surfer is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2018, 01:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’m sure there is still some space left in the wings...

Cheapest option for Gulfstream: Introduce another ASC G650ER->G650LR, move the fuel sensors a bit further and charge an extra million or two...
McMax is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2018, 10:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 844
Received 60 Likes on 24 Posts
Note - Global 7000 now named the Global 7500 - just a bit harder to say in conversation!
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2018, 21:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 964
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Tray Surfer
too much for humans to cope with in regards to crews. Especially when the ability to rest is given as an "option".
Originally Posted by McMax
I’m sure there is still some space left in the wings...
Is that a suggestion regarding a Crew rest area?
jimjim1 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 15:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,911
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
G700 formally announced.

7,500 nautical miles/13,890 kilometers at Mach 0.85 or 6,400 nm/11,853 km at Mach 0.90
atakacs is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2020, 12:32
  #7 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 1,481
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
I’m sure there is still some space left in the wings...
No, that is for the single passenger. The cabin is full of crew rest areas.
601 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2020, 19:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the wild blue yonder
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares ???
Answer: Nobody...
HyFlyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.