Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Ag-Types Fundamental design flaws.

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Ag-Types Fundamental design flaws.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2012, 15:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 72
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ag-Types Fundamental design flaws.

There are many fine Ag Types out there..... Airtractor, Thrushes, Ag-Cats,
Cessna Agwagons, the list goes on..... I've flown most of them over the years but I am still amazed that a type can be certified with a Fundamental Design Flaw.
Most of these types, on take-off, the forward visibility is NIL, thats right, NIL until you get the tail up at 40-50 knots. With a fully loaded machine this may take you 200-300metres down the airstrip. The only forward visibility you have is a splay perhaps 20 degrees each side of the centreline, where you may see the fence posts and if you're of average height like me, the view directly in front over the nose angles up a few degrees so you'll maybe see the top of any trees at the end of the strip. I am always wondering if some clown is riding a bike up the strip or a cow has broken though the fence and quietly resting on the strip. I would never know until the crunch.
There are however three types that come to mind that do have good viz over the nose and they are the Fletcher, Cresco and 750XL.
wingz5000 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2012, 16:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Those 3 are nosewheel types. Poor visibility over the nose is problematic in many tailwheel types, not just ag. aircraft.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2012, 18:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I wonder how much it would cost to fit and certify a small camera and screen.
N707ZS is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2012, 20:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: scotland
Age: 43
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or what about a simple fold up/down mirror.

fats
fatmanmedia is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2012, 23:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: .
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are however three types that come to mind that do have good viz over the nose and they are the Fletcher, Cresco and 750XL.
All of which are essentially the same type.
blah blah blah is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2012, 20:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Being taller than normal I find it OK looking over the nose, still a problem at times but you work with what you have. The best AG aircraft is the one your flying at the moment, you make the best of it.
If your flying a Tractor then it's controls are light and responsive, a Thrush is stable and very predictable in turns. If you go from a Tractor to a Thrush then you think the Thrush is heavy and unresponsive, go the other way and you think the Tractor is flighty and over sensitive. As I said you work with what you have and enjoy it's particular good points.
Visibility the same, you can't change it so you get used to it. One thing that exacerbates that is most strips you work off are unprepared short strips with all sorts of obstacles from an auger on the end of the strip to timber and terrain so you have to thread down a gully.
Radials seem worse, you have to have a good memory to work in mountainous country.
As I said make the best of what you have, enjoy it's particular good points and be aware of it's bad ones.
Super Cecil is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2012, 02:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not certain that the reduced ground visibility associated with a single engine conventional gear design should preclude certification. This issue is almost as old as aviation and has certainly been virtually, if not officially, "grandfathered" in.

While the "nose dragger" concept fixes that it introduces other issues into the mix such as unimproved strip operations and installing another big draggy thing out in front which has to be dealt with when tuning the dispersal pattern.

Any ag plane design that I've dealt with has had it's quirks and once they become evident you adjust your procedures to take them into account.
CropGun is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 07:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: two feet AGL or wherever there's smoke
Age: 47
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a more fixable design flaw in the Air Tractor fuel system! Like claiming to have a headder "tank" , when it is nothing more then a bulge in the fuel line to trap air and aid in a flame-out!

Last edited by maxspeed; 20th Nov 2012 at 18:07.
maxspeed is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2012, 07:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: two feet AGL or wherever there's smoke
Age: 47
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far a camera and screen. It has being done and works well, on training models of the 802u, more for rear seat instuctor self presivation puposes!
maxspeed is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.