Small Business Aircraft 6 seat - Best Choice?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: POOLE, DORSET, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Small Business Aircraft 6 seat - Best Choice?
Following on from previous post - for flying business passengers around UK and occasional European trip - 6 passenger capacity what choices would people make on suibtable aircraft model. It must be versatile and not too limited on speed or altitude.
Another priority is that it must be a widely used type and model so that my experience and hours can be easily transferable.
Previously we were looking at the Cessna 421. This has really been discounted now due to wingspar problems, speed and engine restrictions.
I have been looking at the King Air series but i think it is too far over our requirements in terms of size and space. The Piper Cheyenne II looks suibtable?
Another priority is that it must be a widely used type and model so that my experience and hours can be easily transferable.
Previously we were looking at the Cessna 421. This has really been discounted now due to wingspar problems, speed and engine restrictions.
I have been looking at the King Air series but i think it is too far over our requirements in terms of size and space. The Piper Cheyenne II looks suibtable?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: POOLE, DORSET, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure exactly on what budget we have available yet, depends on what syndicate we can put together.
We must find something with minimal depreciation. Keeping all options open at the moment. Realistically 500,000 is the absolute maximum.
We must find something with minimal depreciation. Keeping all options open at the moment. Realistically 500,000 is the absolute maximum.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daifly
Forget anything after Beech 200 in the above list then.
Click below
http://www.controller.com/listings/f...95FEDEDE198383
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Presgill City
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best bang for your buck( or should I say pound) would be either a metro or a Merlin III. Economical, large cabin and good range and not too thirsty Garrett TPE 331 engines. That would be my choice.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,439
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dllcooper,
what do you mean by: Another priority is that it must be a widely used type and model so that my experience and hours can be easily transferable. ?
Transferable experience? You wanna switch to another employer afterwards ?
If so, the Beech should be your first choice, the classrating is for the 90´s (including F90), 99, 100, and 200. The Cheyenne, especially the II is NOT an beginners aeroplane - the 90 is much easier to handle and systemwise the better aeroplane. Spares are not a problem on the KA, the Cheyenne is out of production for a long time now and might get a problem in that respect.(havent operated Cheyennes since 1991 and thus can speculate only). The Conquest I is a very good airplane, does a lot for the money and is roomy inside (basically a 421 with Turboprops) And its very quiet inside if I remember correctly (flew in one 92-93ish). I this class of aeroplane, the maintenance is really important - if you have a shop on your airfield that knows the choosen type very well, that could save you a fortune especially when operating elder airframes as you would. Whatever you go for, make sure that you have a torough pre-purchase inspection done by an independent, well established shop. DON´T SAVE ON THAT ONE! Do at least a boroscope inspection of the engines - those will KILL you when in bad shape.(at least financially) Only take an airplane that is up to date in respect of Service Bulletins. Avionics get more and more important (mode-S, for example) Make sure, the aircraft in question is updated or updatable. get something in writing from the prepurchase avionics departement.
And finally, put a simulator training on your budget.
what do you mean by: Another priority is that it must be a widely used type and model so that my experience and hours can be easily transferable. ?
Transferable experience? You wanna switch to another employer afterwards ?
If so, the Beech should be your first choice, the classrating is for the 90´s (including F90), 99, 100, and 200. The Cheyenne, especially the II is NOT an beginners aeroplane - the 90 is much easier to handle and systemwise the better aeroplane. Spares are not a problem on the KA, the Cheyenne is out of production for a long time now and might get a problem in that respect.(havent operated Cheyennes since 1991 and thus can speculate only). The Conquest I is a very good airplane, does a lot for the money and is roomy inside (basically a 421 with Turboprops) And its very quiet inside if I remember correctly (flew in one 92-93ish). I this class of aeroplane, the maintenance is really important - if you have a shop on your airfield that knows the choosen type very well, that could save you a fortune especially when operating elder airframes as you would. Whatever you go for, make sure that you have a torough pre-purchase inspection done by an independent, well established shop. DON´T SAVE ON THAT ONE! Do at least a boroscope inspection of the engines - those will KILL you when in bad shape.(at least financially) Only take an airplane that is up to date in respect of Service Bulletins. Avionics get more and more important (mode-S, for example) Make sure, the aircraft in question is updated or updatable. get something in writing from the prepurchase avionics departement.
And finally, put a simulator training on your budget.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK&ME
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dllcooper
Not sure exactly on what budget we have available yet, depends on what syndicate we can put together.
We must find something with minimal depreciation. Keeping all options open at the moment. Realistically 500,000 is the absolute maximum.
We must find something with minimal depreciation. Keeping all options open at the moment. Realistically 500,000 is the absolute maximum.
Personally, I would be researching into some of the new technology aircraft, so that you aren't left behind in the coming future. GA will expand fast as new means arise to get small business associates to locations quickly. I can see it happening from where I work.
With new aircraft, I refer to the likes of ADAMS Aircraft & ECLIPSE Aviation with their VLJ's (Very Light Jets). Visit their websites and you'll be surprised at just how good most of these are. They might be past your $ budget, but are very affordable with the low running costs. Most clients don't need this fancy wank crap, and luxury aircraft systems which they rarely utilise on a short haul flight.
Maybe just too keen to see someone actually be the guinea pig and purchase something new....
With new aircraft, I refer to the likes of ADAMS Aircraft & ECLIPSE Aviation with their VLJ's (Very Light Jets). Visit their websites and you'll be surprised at just how good most of these are. They might be past your $ budget, but are very affordable with the low running costs. Most clients don't need this fancy wank crap, and luxury aircraft systems which they rarely utilise on a short haul flight.
Maybe just too keen to see someone actually be the guinea pig and purchase something new....
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kulwin Park
Personally, I would be researching into some of the new technology aircraft, so that you aren't left behind in the coming future. GA will expand fast as new means arise to get small business associates to locations quickly. I can see it happening from where I work.
With new aircraft, I refer to the likes of ADAMS Aircraft & ECLIPSE Aviation with their VLJ's (Very Light Jets). Visit their websites and you'll be surprised at just how good most of these are. They might be past your $ budget, but are very affordable with the low running costs. Most clients don't need this fancy wank crap, and luxury aircraft systems which they rarely utilise on a short haul flight.
Maybe just too keen to see someone actually be the guinea pig and purchase something new....
With new aircraft, I refer to the likes of ADAMS Aircraft & ECLIPSE Aviation with their VLJ's (Very Light Jets). Visit their websites and you'll be surprised at just how good most of these are. They might be past your $ budget, but are very affordable with the low running costs. Most clients don't need this fancy wank crap, and luxury aircraft systems which they rarely utilise on a short haul flight.
Maybe just too keen to see someone actually be the guinea pig and purchase something new....
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: POOLE, DORSET, UK
Age: 48
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just had a look at the Eclipse 500. Very intersting reading that and i will certainly look into some financing options and see how it comes out. The maintenance seems minimal.
Its the future!!
Its the future!!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have a look here http://www.adamaircraft.com/home.asp they do both a turboprop and jet version.
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't discount the C421 on the basis of the wing spar SID. It makes for a very good bargaining tool when negotiating the purchase price. The mandatory inspection is very expensive in the UK but there are other JAR approved maintenance organisations in Europe that can carry it out for a fraction of the price. I'll happily let you have the details if you want them.
It's certainly a better aircraft than Navajo/Chieften, a cabin that's a lot quieter than a King Air cabin and when you do need to replace the engines - alot cheaper than the King Air donkeys. And when the diesel engines are approved, well......
It's certainly a better aircraft than Navajo/Chieften, a cabin that's a lot quieter than a King Air cabin and when you do need to replace the engines - alot cheaper than the King Air donkeys. And when the diesel engines are approved, well......
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by READY MESSAGE
Don't discount the C421 on the basis of the wing spar SID.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bristol
Age: 54
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the 500K to set up the operation or for the aircraft alone. My suggestion. Offer an existing operator 500K worth of flying in return for a job when you have qualified.
Phil
Phil
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the wild blue yonder
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Phenom
You'll have to wait a while, but in the VLJ and slightly larger class the new aircraft by Embraer is neck and shoulders ahead in almost all areas.
You have a CJ1 sized cabin and even more baggage space, single pilot operation. Range about 1,200nm and 41kt foot ceiling with Mach 0.78 cruise.
Price is below$3million new, but first deliveries are only looking to be in 2009.
Operating costs seem really low as well, and if it is anything like the ERJ's then reliability is a given........
The point that this is a little above the budget may be offset that the depreciation on this 'real' jet is likely to be quite low, as availability after issue due to quite long orderbook is going to keep prices high. Equally to offset the higher cost it could be effectively chartered when you are not using it....this income could offset the higher costs.
If you can't wait until 2009, then a used CJ1 may be a good option, or even a share with European Business Jets near Cambrdige (see the thread near this one, today).
Eclipse is a great option if you are a dwarf (OOps person of vertically challenged disposition :-)) !!!!!!
Adams...... Hmm...... The Sinclair car of the Sky....looked down upon by even 'Smart' drivers. Don't do it.....
Your original enquiry suggested that such million $ deals were out of budget.....
For 6 pax, gotta go with a KingAir if you want to transfer the hours and experience. the cabin is great in a C90, with 6 pax and baggage it's the one to go for.
You have a CJ1 sized cabin and even more baggage space, single pilot operation. Range about 1,200nm and 41kt foot ceiling with Mach 0.78 cruise.
Price is below$3million new, but first deliveries are only looking to be in 2009.
Operating costs seem really low as well, and if it is anything like the ERJ's then reliability is a given........
The point that this is a little above the budget may be offset that the depreciation on this 'real' jet is likely to be quite low, as availability after issue due to quite long orderbook is going to keep prices high. Equally to offset the higher cost it could be effectively chartered when you are not using it....this income could offset the higher costs.
If you can't wait until 2009, then a used CJ1 may be a good option, or even a share with European Business Jets near Cambrdige (see the thread near this one, today).
Eclipse is a great option if you are a dwarf (OOps person of vertically challenged disposition :-)) !!!!!!
Adams...... Hmm...... The Sinclair car of the Sky....looked down upon by even 'Smart' drivers. Don't do it.....
Your original enquiry suggested that such million $ deals were out of budget.....
For 6 pax, gotta go with a KingAir if you want to transfer the hours and experience. the cabin is great in a C90, with 6 pax and baggage it's the one to go for.
