Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc.
Reload this Page >

Falcon 900 Accident in Stansted

Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

Falcon 900 Accident in Stansted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2004, 09:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 55N20W
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Falcon 900 Accident in Stansted

Just heard about a Falcon 900 gone off the end of the runway at STN with its gear up. At the moment the runway will be closed for 7 hours. Anyone any more news?????
SM82 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 09:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard the same from our handling agents. AAIB are en-route, although no estimate was given for STN re-opening. Slot one deps are unlikely though by all accounts.
ghost-rider is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 10:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAIB are not attending, runway is expected to re-open around 0530-0600. Minimal damage to the runway surface which is being repaired now. 4POB and all un hurt. Last i saw was the nose & Port gear had been lowered but the starbord was still tucked away.

Chef
Chef is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 11:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard Runway expected to open around 0500, a/c still on the grass though.
Chef is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 12:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As Chef stated, and to confirm, STN now open again.
ghost-rider is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 13:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VP-BMS was as diversion from Luton. This from a Luton website earlier: DA50 VP-BMS currently orbiting just East of Stevenage/over North East Stevenage (around 7.5 miles on the 26 approach) at 3000ft - was about to establish for r/w 26 at 00.54 when crew advised Luton approach of u/c problem. Aircraft unable to lower any of its u/c and has advised ATC 30 mins fuel left (at 01.04). Aircraft still orbiting at 01.11 (around seven orbits now). Aircraft requesting instructions and advice re diverting to an airport where foam can be laid down for a gear up landing. Stansted and LHR 27R being considered. Crew now requesting vectors to Stansted for 23 (at 01.12).

post 2

Aircraft has opted for landing on Stansted 05 - requested runway foamed if possible for a gear up landing. Now burning fuel before making 05 approach. Still has u/c problems - sounds like no u/c has lowered.
LTNman is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 22:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's the report from the BBC

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Jet makes emergency landing

An executive four-seater jet was forced to make an emergency landing at Stansted Airport in Essex because its wheels would not lower for landing.
The Falcon 900 jet, which was carrying two crew and two passengers, touched down with no landing gear at 0118 GMT on Monday. No-one on board was hurt.

The aircraft, en route from Tanzania to Luton in Bedfordshire, was diverted to Stansted after reporting a problem.

The runway was closed until 0530 GMT while it was inspected for damage.

A spokesman for the airport said some early flights may be delayed.

Essex Police said the Air Accident Investigation Bureau had been informed of the incident.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/essex/3471455.stm
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Four seater...my how the Falcon900 has shrunk.... oh well what else can be expected!
jetstream7 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 23:08
  #8 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At least they didn't say the jet had 4 engines!!!
Jerricho is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 23:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to other web sources VP-BMS is a DA Falcon 900 EX owned by Stork.
FlapsOne is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2004, 23:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice to see everybody walk away unhurt. Job's a good'un I reckon.
witchdoctor is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 00:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

For the crew:

Congratulations........
Good job guys !


The News:

The BBC is really a nice professional station ?! they make better job everyday ...........
Raynald is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 01:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
A Falcon 900 described as "...a four-seater jet..."


Obviously it's owners opted for the really, really, really BIG armchairs.

Apart from that, this would be one of the best media reports I've seen. No hysteria, no hype - just the facts presented in a way that non-aviation types would easily understand.
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 02:31
  #13 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually Tinstaafl, you make an excellent point. It is refreshing to see a report like this, a non-sensationalist aviation incident news report.

Maybe the Hutton thingie was good for something after all?
Jerricho is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2004, 07:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 79
Posts: 807
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, Tins, really big armchairs or perhaps a couple of queen-sized beds (don't think kingsize would quite fit without blisters a la PBY).
broadreach is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.