Close but no banana.
|
Ghee-never knew Luciele had an aircraft
|
You picked a fine time to tell me that, Bear.
|
Originally Posted by Self loading bear
(Post 11333051)
Ghee-never knew Luciele had an aircraft
Attempting to follow the clues above - Michel Colomban's Luciole? If correct - control should go to you, Bear. :D |
Originally Posted by Noyade
(Post 11333666)
Attempting to follow the clues above - Michel Colomban's Luciole?
If correct - control should go to you, Bear. :D Was the cockpit on the second photo. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....2584d1390.jpeg |
Startling performance from a 24Hp Briggs and Stratton! 90mph cruise, range over 300 miles, airframe weighs just 100Kg dry, 300Kg MAUW.
Bear has control. |
Thanks Mel (and Noyade),
This aircraft is not known for its cockpit. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....3ce1b1d1b.jpeg |
that looks Russian blue to me
|
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11334391)
that looks Russian blue to me
|
Agreed that's Russian or Soviet bloc.
It's a big heavy single piston I think, An2 era. |
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
(Post 11334474)
Agreed that's Russian or Soviet bloc.
It's a big heavy single piston I think, An2 era. single piston yes But not a heavy one And certainly later then An2 2 built 1 flew |
That tidy cockpit would run rings around an AN2
|
I'm out of ideas.
|
I think its the Narushevich OW-1 - a truly weird design
I finished up from "Russian Experimental aircraft" to "cool weird planes" on Google and looked at some seriously odd aircraft on the way............ https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....530b3261b4.jpg OH if correct |
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11335089)
I think its the Narushevich OW-1 - a truly weird design
OH if correct It seems this orange one did never fly. There is a YouTube film with the other one taking off. Not very convincing. OH called May I call UV to come up with something? You clearly knew. |
Sorry nothing to offer at the moment, so OH please.
|
When I saw the cockpit picture, I immediately imagined this exchange:
Test pilot: “The ailerons are too heavy.” Designer: “No problem. We’ll make the yoke wider. “ After seeing that monstrosity, I wonder if I was close to the truth! 😂 |
Originally Posted by India Four Two
(Post 11336048)
When I saw the cockpit picture, I immediately imagined this exchange:
Test pilot: “The ailerons are too heavy.” Designer: “No problem. We’ll make the yoke wider. “ After seeing that monstrosity, I wonder if I was close to the truth! 😂 And what a ghastly looking yoke arrangement with all those cables, pulleys, linkages and such. How clumsy can it get? Eeeuwww! I feel for the test pilots of that monstrosity. |
|
Yuropean?
|
Indeed.
|
Blowing up the picture it looks like it's maybe a twin jet of some sort (tho only a basic set of dials)
the total lack of design ergonomics suggests pre-1955? |
Both correct.
Only two built. Unusual configuration. |
Ahhh - now THAT helps!
SNCASE Grognard - quite unusual!! |
You never cease to astound me!
How the digamma did you ever get that? Correct of course, the French - configuration at least - comparison to the Lightining, but as ever if it was said if it looks right....this one wasn't a contender. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....30469ff2be.png Talk about the Hunchback but please not on my patch! And whatever was it about with those enormous wheels? |
It was European and I was pretty sure it wasn't British - it didn't look Russian or E European. Which left France, maybe Italy or Sweden as the Spanish couldn't source anything like that from the UK or USA until the '60's
It was a twin jet (which was unusual pre 1955) and it was "Unconventional" - so Sweden or France. They built 2 (that was a major help!). Lots of scouring of old books and the internet but once I saw the picture it was easy to find a picture of the cockpit - and that awful handwheel on the port side of the cockpit = BINGO! https://www.militaryfactory.com/airc...rcraft_id=1498 is a good source for the program bit of a dog but tested a lot of future technology OH I'm afraid! |
"The cockpit did away with a traditional control column and flightstick, "elbow controling" being used to free up forward vision."
I wish they'd elaborate on that - I can't find any info on it at all. Sounds fascinating. |
maybe those two funnelly looking devices like speaking tubes to the left of THE WHEEL - looks like you could press your elbow into one or the other
|
Think it is a sidestick and armrest inboard of the wheel,and possibly another on right side..
|
|
I think it is this one.
But cockpit side doesn’t match https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....4bc013e00.jpeg |
Hi Bear. I believe it is what you think it is - name it and it's all yours. :ok:
My forward shot... https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....bc18744df6.png |
Few more clues then.
Wiki says 580 built. Underpowered and unpopular. |
Looks like a Blenheim - but not sure what Mark
|
I would have guessed a Blenheim, but given the comments in 3233 it is a Botha.
Test pilot report - this a/c is very difficult to get into, and it should have been made impossible. No pictures to post myself so open house. |
Botha it is.
We have Open House. |
A long way from the Botha in almost all respects:
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f35cc2438.jpeg |
General Aircraft Hamilcar?
|
And even I didn’t recognize it
https://www.pprune.org/aviation-hist...l#post11038144 |
Open House if I’m correct please.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.