PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Aviation History and Nostalgia (https://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia-86/)
-   -   Challenge (https://www.pprune.org/aviation-history-nostalgia/461976-challenge.html)

evansb 20th Sep 2011 15:04

spook is correct :ok:. The Blackburn Buccaneer. Your turn, spook.

spook 20th Sep 2011 16:03

Thank you Sir!

Let's try this one

http://i387.photobucket.com/albums/o...2754resize.jpg

MReyn24050 20th Sep 2011 17:24

Canadair CL-600-2B16 Challenger perhaps?

spook 20th Sep 2011 22:09

Spot on!:ok:
YHC

MReyn24050 20th Sep 2011 23:01

Thanks Spook. Here is the next one:-
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6.../Tailpipe3.jpg

Kitbag 21st Sep 2011 05:17

Jumo 004 from Me 262?

MReyn24050 21st Sep 2011 08:23

Sorry kitbag not a Jumo 004 from Me 262.
Mel

Noyade 21st Sep 2011 08:25

G'day Mel. Russian?

Noyade 21st Sep 2011 09:06

Hate to ask Mel, but is that the mouth or the bum end?

MReyn24050 21st Sep 2011 10:41

Hi Graeme.
It is not Russian and as you put it so delicately it is the "bum end".
Mel

Lightning Mate 21st Sep 2011 14:27

Mel,

Are those engines pod mounted under the wing or rear fuselage?

MReyn24050 21st Sep 2011 15:44

Hi David the engine is in the fuselage.

Noyade 22nd Sep 2011 10:05

http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/3264/img020tb.jpg

MReyn24050 22nd Sep 2011 11:17

Not Butterfly tail Graeme. The tailplanes were more horizontal than your sketch.

Lightning Mate 22nd Sep 2011 12:10

The small circular exhaust between the cones might well be an oil fume exhaust, which indicates an early pure turbojet, possibly utilising a total loss oil system.

MReyn24050 22nd Sep 2011 12:50

You may well be correct David as this aircraft was an early example of an aircraft powered by jet propulsion.

SincoTC 22nd Sep 2011 13:02

Hi Mel,

Is it the Caproni-Campini CC-2 N.1 ??

Open House please if correct, as I'm busy this afternoon.

MReyn24050 22nd Sep 2011 14:26

You are of course correct Trevor. :ok:
The Caproni Campini N1
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6...oni_foto-1.jpg

As designed by Campini, the aircraft did not have a jet engine in the sense that we know them today. Rather, a conventional 700 kW (940 hp) Isotta Fraschini L. 121/R.C. 40 piston engine was used to drive a compressor, which forced air into a combustion chamber where it was mixed with fuel and ignited. The exhaust produced by this combustion was to drive the aircraft forward. Campini called this configuration a "thermojet," but the term "motorjet" is in common usage today for this arrangement since thermojet is now used to refer to a particular type of pulsejet (an unrelated form of jet engine). It has also been described as a ducted fan.
As Trevor says Open House

Lightning Mate 22nd Sep 2011 14:58

I think I might have a go.....

http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/u...ng_29/pipe.jpg

Spit161 22nd Sep 2011 15:22

Is it the Japanese flying bomb, the Ohka?
Open house if correct.

cheers,
Jake.


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:04.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.