MReyn24050.
Thank you, Sir, for your comments. I was only dipping my toes into the water. I'm actually just amazed by the knowhow you gentlemen share and am prepared just to stand back in awe.(I'm also a bit of a nerd when it comes to posting pictures.) Please do not allow me to interfere with the party. KRgds, Sleeve. :ok: |
Sleeve Wing
Please do not stand back in awe come in an join the party. As you will have seen this thread has been running for some six months and some 260+ cockpits have been presented to date including the F106A. Should you like a copy of a spreadsheet listing those already presented please PM me. Should WUB confirm it to be the F106B then, anyone, please feel free to post a new challenge. Mel |
It's a QF 106, well done Sleeve
|
List of aircraft types presented in this thread so far
Sleeve, welcome to the thread. Don't be shy - join the fun! |
wub
You say that the aircraft was a QF106. A search on Google produced the following information regarding the QF 106. "Following the retirement of the last operational F106A Delta Dart in 1988, some 277 single seat (F106A) and 63 two seat versions (F106B) were converted into remotely targetable drones were converted to QF106 aerial target drones under the 'Pacer Six' Program, with most being expended by the 82 ATRS at Tyndall AFB (Florida). In the course of active operations QF106 drone ops, which extended to January of 1998, there were several flyable survivors which were able to return to AMARC for storage (D-MAFB, AZ). There were also a few non-flying airframes left on the Tyndall ramp at the end of the 'Pacer Six' Program (7 aircraft), as well, and originally they were parked in that part of the Tyndall AFB ramp known as the 'Swamp' (although in unflyable condition). Purchase of these remaining airframes was subsequently negotiated by a private aviation enterprise based in Texas (David Tokoff's GRECO-AIR in El Paso) and a tentative deal was struck with DRMS to sell the aircraft for purposes of restoring them as non-flying, museum-display grade aircraft. One of these aircraft was reportedly ear-marked for restoration as a fully operational flying specimen, although it appears that perhaps two of them may have been fully restored at this time for flight (including a two-seat B model); however, due to the fact that stringent 'de-mil' requirements for combat aircraft require cutting the airframe structural members to render them incapable of further flight applications, this stalled the whole purchase package for some time. As of 2 Mar 04, the non-flying survivors have all been trucked from the Tyndall ramp and shipped to GRECO-AIR's El Paso base of operations, where most of them are awaiting restoration". I would be interested to know if this particular aircraft was in fact a converted F106B. Mel |
No challenges? Well here is an easy one to keep the thread going.
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6...kpitquiz19.jpg |
Looks like a Hawker Sea Hawk from here?
|
Mel,
I would be interested to know if this particular aircraft was in fact a converted F106B. |
682al
You are correct Sir. You have control cringe Thanks for the link. Looking at the adjacent photograph showing the forward portion of the cockpit visor I can now see that it was a F106A. Mel |
|
Achtung! Spitfire?
|
Leider nicht, Herr Vub! :D
|
Ach! Scheiße :confused:
Hurricane then |
nor a Hurricane.
|
I will go for a Fairey Fulmar or perhaps an early Firefly Mk.
|
Not from the Fairey stable...
|
I will go off on a complete tangent, even though the compass makes me think it is British, and say Junkers JU87 Stuka.
|
Sorry MReyn24050, you are indeed on a tangent. :D
|
Boulton-Paul Defiant?????
|
correct gas path, over to you!
|
Incoming............again!
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4..._early_one.jpg[/IMG] |
Caprioni? Can't remember the number - will have to look it up.
|
And your answer is....................................wrong:p :}
Not Italian! |
Dornier DOX perhaps?
|
Curtiss H-16 ?
|
Ilya Muromets?
|
cringe
Well done you have beaten us again. After you suggested it to be the Curtiss H-16 I found a copy of the photograph on a document entitled "Aircraft of the AEF". Whereas the layout of the cockpit DO-X is similar it was for two pilots not for a single pilot. Mel |
cringe, over to you:ok: twas indeed the Curtiss H 1-16.
|
Apologies for being late again. What type was the following contraption fitted into?
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...nge_/unk28.jpg |
cringe
The DFS 228 V1. Here she is on the back off a Dornier Do 217K V-3 http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6...raft/228-6.jpg Mel |
Blohm und Voss BV 40 ?
|
Sorry mikl, not the BV 40.
Well done Mel, you're correct about the DFS 228. It was the V2 prototype; according to my information the V1 had a conventional sitting position for the pilot. |
Cringe
Thanks, I knew they were intending to use a pilot in the normal sitting position on the V1 but wasnt sure if they achieved it. Here is a another one I am sure you and the other experts will not have a great deal of trouble with. http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c6...kpitquiz39.jpg |
A variation of the Waco 10 ???..... ASO .....INF one of those series ?
|
Sorrry Bert neither of those.
|
OK, the other obvious choice would be a Travelair ?
|
Wrong again Bert, however it is from North America.
|
Ryan? But not the PT22..
PT16? |
No Sir, not a Ryan. This type first flew in 1930.
|
Consolidated / Brewster Fleet?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.