Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Handley Page Type O

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2024, 14:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary cw
7 - because they ' developed' the airframe they drew and made every single piece of the aircraft and tested every piece. They started to realise wood with straight grain was best for aircraft production. Any ' wooden' aircraft use ' aviation grade ' timber. This was the start of that specification.
Although I was actually looking to see if an early copy of The Aeroplane was available, I found a book on the Internet Archive called Building and Flying an Aeroplane, published in Chicago in 1912.
I quote: "...must be straight-grained and perfectly free from knots and other defects".

BTW Handley Page, not page.
DHfan is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2024, 21:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary cw
Good afternoon.
I am simply repeating that Rolls Royce were particularly pleased with the epicyclic control gear.
I would suggest if that is what Rolls Royce thought it is Probably quite good

Many thanks

Gary
The drivel was regarding your assertion that epicyclic gearing was in virtually every gearbox and engine in the world, which is absolute rubbish, or if you prefer - just plain wrong.
DHfan is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Mar 2024, 07:50
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 517
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary cw
Good afternoon.
I am simply repeating that Rolls Royce were particularly pleased with the epicyclic control gear.
I would suggest if that is what Rolls Royce thought it is Probably quite good

Many thanks

Gary
Originally Posted by Gary cw
Good afternoon
Many thanks for the reply. The 2 ghost engines were combined to produce the Eagle engine
As to the gearing I believe it was to reduce the crank revolutions for the propeller
It would help if you tried to understand what the rest of us have written. As I wrote before, the Ghost engine was a cast-iron sidevalve and the Hawk (and therefore its derivative, the Eagle) was a separate-cylinder fabricated engine with overhead valves and camshafts. Those engines did not have a reduction gear, and the much later RR engines that did were not epicyclic gears. A reduction gear is not a control gear and my earlier question asked what control gear you referred to.
Allan Lupton is online now  
Old 5th Mar 2024, 08:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Much to my surprise, according to Wiki, the Rolls-Royce Falcon did have an epicyclic reduction gear. I know they're pretty much standard on radials but it's the first I've heard of one on an inline engine.
DHfan is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2024, 08:55
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Lancashire uk
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eagle engine.

Originally Posted by Allan Lupton
It would help if you tried to understand what the rest of us have written. As I wrote before, the Ghost engine was a cast-iron sidevalve and the Hawk (and therefore its derivative, the Eagle) was a separate-cylinder fabricated engine with overhead valves and camshafts. Those engines did not have a reduction gear, and the much later RR engines that did were not epicyclic gears. A reduction gear is not a control gear and my earlier question asked what control gear you referred to.
good morning
Many thanks for the comment. I can only repeat what the documentation I have has stated. Allegedly RR put 2 ghost engines together to make a V12. Wether that was 2 actual engines or the internal specifications I don't know.. It is simply what I have read in a document in my possession. In the process they patented what they called an epicyclic control gear. Maybe it ment something different then I simply don't know. If you ' google' epicyclic control gear' it would immediately point you towards planetary gearing.
As to wether or not the eagle engine actually had a reduction gear I would suggest that as the propeller on the Handley page was enormous ( something in the range of 10 to 12 feet from memory) I would suggest the engine spinning at about 1400 rpm it would certainly need a reduction gear.
and if you look at any eagle engine pictures it looks to me suspiciously like a gearbox between engine and prop.

Many thanks
Gary
Gary cw is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2024, 09:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,794
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
My copy of 'British Piston Aero-Engines' agrees with Wiki:
FALCON I, 230 hp, (1916-17), 'Rolls-Royce 190 hp, Mk I', 12-cylinder, upright 60-degree Vee water-cooled, poppet-valve (two- valve engine), Bore/stroke 4 × 5.75in (101.6 × 146.0 mm). Vol. 866.5 cu in. (14.2 litre). Compression ratio 5.15:1, geared, epicyclic .589:1, R.H./L.H. tractor-drive. (Engines with even serial numbers were L.H. tractor but the great majority built were R.H., with odd numbers .) Two Watford magnetos, two Duplex 34 mm Claudel- Hobson carburettors, feeding three-cylinder inlet manifolds. 250 built at Derby and by Brazil Straker. Length 68.0 in; width 40.3 in; height 37.2 in.
Originally Posted by Gary cw
I am very sorry if I have upset anyone. But my understanding is that the epicyclic gearing was in fact patented by Rolls Royce. If anyone believes it was ' invented' before please let me know. I can change my details. Going back to the patent it would not have been approved as a patent if it already existed.
From Wiki:
Epicyclic gearing was used in the Antikythera Mechanism, circa 80 BCE
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicyclic_gearing
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2024, 11:46
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Bill Gunston's World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines confirms everybody except the OP's views.

There was absolutely no connection between the Rolls-Royce Ghost engine and the Eagle or any other Rolls-Royce aero engine. As stated the Ghost was a side-valve cast-iron monobloc and the Eagle had overhead cams and individual steel forged cylinders with welded water jackets.


Far from R-R not knowing about about the Grand Prix Mercedes, Lieutenant W.O. Bentley (RNAS) of the Admiralty suggested that the Mercedes cylinders would be a good starting point, as R-R only had experience with cast-iron monoblocs.
On the first Sunday of the war the car was towed to Derby by Bentley and his boss where the engine was dismantled by Ernest Hives, later Lord Hives and R-R's chief.

Royce spent nearly a month evaluating alternative engine layouts, taking particular care not to infringe any Mercedes patents. He finally settled on a water-cooled V-12. Bentley suggested the use of aluminium pistons, as opposed to cast-iron.

The Eagle did have epicyclic reduction gear, as did the Condor which followed it. It was only when Rowledge from Napier arrived that R-R switched to spur reduction gears on later versions of the Condor.

I assume everybody knows or would realise that the aforementioned Lieutenant Bentley was THE Bentley...

Last edited by DHfan; 7th Mar 2024 at 23:53. Reason: Bentley
DHfan is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2024, 11:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 9,758
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What did the Baron think of the O/100?



Noyade is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2024, 12:52
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Lancashire uk
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eagle engine

Originally Posted by DHfan
Bill Gunston's World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines confirms everybody except the OP's views.

There was absolutely no connection between the Rolls-Royce Ghost engine and the Eagle. As stated the Ghost was a side-valve cast-iron monobloc and the Eagle had overhead cams and individual steel forged cylinders with welded water jackets.


Far from R-R not knowing about about the Grand Prix Mercedes, Lieutenant W.O. Bentley (RNAS) of the Admiralty suggested that the Mercedes cylinders would be a good starting point, as R-R only had experience with cast-iron monoblocs.
On the first Sunday of the war the car was towed to Derby by Bentley and his boss where the engine was dismantled by Ernest Hives, later Lord Hives and R-R's chief.

Royce spent nearly a month evaluating alternative engine layouts, taking particular care not to infringe any Mercedes patents. He finally settled on a water-cooled V-12. Bentley suggested the use of aluminium pistons, as opposed to cast-iron.

The Eagle did have epicyclic reduction gear, as did the Condor which followed it. It was only when Rowledge from Napier arrived that R-R switched to spur reduction gears on later versions of the Condor.
Thank you for that detail I will add it to my collection.
Gary cw is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2024, 22:10
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,821
Received 203 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary cw
Thank you for that detail I will add it to my collection.
... of dissenting views ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2024, 02:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 56
Posts: 1,445
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
It is always worth checking out Rex's hangar on that YouTube:

Load Toad is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2024, 04:57
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 182
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DHfan
Bill Gunston's World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines confirms everybody except the OP's views.

There was absolutely no connection between the Rolls-Royce Ghost engine and the Eagle or any other Rolls-Royce aero engine. As stated the Ghost was a side-valve cast-iron monobloc and the Eagle had overhead cams and individual steel forged cylinders with welded water jackets.


Far from R-R not knowing about about the Grand Prix Mercedes, Lieutenant W.O. Bentley (RNAS) of the Admiralty suggested that the Mercedes cylinders would be a good starting point, as R-R only had experience with cast-iron monoblocs.
On the first Sunday of the war the car was towed to Derby by Bentley and his boss where the engine was dismantled by Ernest Hives, later Lord Hives and R-R's chief.

Royce spent nearly a month evaluating alternative engine layouts, taking particular care not to infringe any Mercedes patents. He finally settled on a water-cooled V-12. Bentley suggested the use of aluminium pistons, as opposed to cast-iron.

The Eagle did have epicyclic reduction gear, as did the Condor which followed it. It was only when Rowledge from Napier arrived that R-R switched to spur reduction gears on later versions of the Condor.

I assume everybody knows or would realise that the aforementioned Lieutenant Bentley was THE Bentley...
Gosh, we are at war with Germany and Royce is being careful not to infringe any Mercedes patents. It’s a wonder we won at all.
Blackfriar is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2024, 07:42
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Lancashire uk
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dissenting views ?

Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
... of dissenting views ?
Many thanks for your reply. Indeed. I think people forget history can be re-written many times. I have stated I have documentary evidence of all I have said. That doesn't mean it is correct in exactly the same way as it doesn't make other people's views correct. BUT if I can get enough ' differing views' it may be possible to come up with something that is probably correct.

It can be a little difficult reading some of the comments but I fully stand by my statement that it is the most influential aircraft in history. Caused enough dissent already and in the timeline the plane hasn't even got of the ground yet. Still pages of ' firsts' to go.
Gary cw is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2024, 07:49
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,437
Received 362 Likes on 211 Posts
It's worth remembering than many UK Schools and colleges list the German war dead as well as the Allied dead on their WW1 memorial boards - it wasn't an "ideological" war - more like an 18th & 19th Century one
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2024, 08:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Derbyshire
Age: 72
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackfriar
Gosh, we are at war with Germany and Royce is being careful not to infringe any Mercedes patents. It’s a wonder we won at all.
That caused me to raise my eyebrows too but on reflection, it was literally the first few days of a war of unknown duration. Nobody knew if the phrase "it will all be over by Christmas" might have been true.
DHfan is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.