Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Spitfires found in Burma

Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Spitfires found in Burma

Old 14th Apr 2012, 05:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: DORSET
Posts: 191
Spitfires found in Burma

Twenty new Spitfires, intended for use in Burma but never flown in anger as the Pacific War ended suddenly/technology changed,may have been located:Spitfires buried in Burma during war to be returned to UK - Telegraph and The new Battle of Burma: Find 20 buried Spitfires and make them fly | Mail OnlineI wonder if they will still be airworthy, or too corroded after 70 years to be anything other than museum pieces?And what monetary value will they have?Priceless from one point of view, but must be worth the cost of salvaging them?

Last edited by sharksandwich; 14th Apr 2012 at 07:07.
sharksandwich is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 06:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 618
Spitfires found in Burma

Outstanding!

Spitfires buried in Burma during war to be returned to UK - Telegraph
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 06:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,493
a historic deal that will see the fighter jets dug up
Amazing they are the jet version, those are REALLY rare...
Daysleeper is online now  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 06:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Age: 70
Posts: 29
Wonderful piece of journalism there! Fighter Jets!! Japanese occupation two weeks before the bomb was dropped, how do these people get a job?
tilleydog1 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 07:17
  #5 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 77
Posts: 3,511
From the comments section, says it all really:

"aircrafts"

"fighter jets"

"Acadamy"

Has this been written by a 14 year old?
green granite is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 07:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hampshire
Age: 49
Posts: 38
Does this mean Battle of Britain Memorial Sqn?....... can we include them in the [email protected] stats
johnnypaveway is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 07:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 260
It really is a classic (by the way I like the Telegraph!). How many "confusions" in this single paragraph? -

However, advances in technology and the emergence of more agile jets meant they were never used and in August 1945, officials fearing a Japanese occupation abandoned them on the orders of Lord Louis Mountbatten, the head of South East Asia Command, two weeks before the atom bombs were dropped, ending the conflict.
baffman is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 07:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Iffy journalism aside, aircraft buried in transport crates with protective wrapping is significant and an exciting prospect for the historic aircraft community.
Tiger_mate is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 07:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 618
Forget about the crap journalism, you can't expect anything else these days, but the fact that a farmer from Lincolnshire has found these ac in Burma is amazing. Yes, he will probably recoup his money and probably more, but would you want them to stay in crates 40ft down in foreign soil??? The cynics should direct their angst towards things like the lottery fund, who would rather dish out the funds to some lame-half-arsed pinko project rather than secure our history, but hey there you go!

I wonder if this find will re-invigorate the search for the Lancasters at Elsham?
Could be the last? is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 07:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,527
I have tried to follow this story and I even checked the date to ensure it wasn't the RAF's birthday. But it makes very little sense. Dates, Marks, locations are all over the place. For example, why were US servicemen involved in their disposal? Why did SACSEA (Mountbatten) order their disposal, fearing that they'd be grabbed by the Japanese, when in mid 1945 the Japs were finished in Burma? MK II Spits? Delivered in Late 1941 - but not touched until 1945?

I hope these inconsistencies are due to poor reporting (qv ad naseum) and the aircraft are found - but it all sounds a bit speculative (BBC claim they could be found; DT that they have) and reminds me for the search 40 years ago for 'crated' Boeing seaplanes from WWI stored in the tunnels of North Head, Auckland.

Last edited by Whenurhappy; 14th Apr 2012 at 08:04.
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 08:07
  #11 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 76
Posts: 16,593
What would make sense is a late delivery when they were no longer needed hence they were not uncrated and then dumped as they were surplus to requirements and uneconomic to return to UK or give to one of the liberated countries.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Darkest Surrey
Posts: 5,957
Camerloon can now state he has provided RAF with 40 "New" planes

and as

Burma has some oil and as its important to screw China he will do any deal that will see UK influence back in a country that HMG so lovingly looked after as a benevolent part of the Empire all those years ago.
racedo is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:11
  #13 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 77
Posts: 3,511
Interestingly the Mail has a slightly different slant on why they were buried:

"But the Mark II Spitfires in the secret haul never saw action. Earl Mountbatten issued an order for them to be hidden in 1945 to prevent foreign forces from getting their hands on them as the British army demobilised. The aircraft, straight from the production line, were buried in crates at a depth of 4ft to 6ft to preserve them."
green granite is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: at the behest of the Queen of Canada.
Posts: 797
Can I have one please?
Hueymeister is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:18
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 75
Posts: 6,339
That will keep Mark22 off the streets for a bit. Will be great if it come off.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 75
Posts: 6,339
Does this cache mean the unit price will go down?.....thought not..

I'll get my coat
Wander00 is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:42
  #17 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Person
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: see roster
Posts: 1,263
A comment by a reader after the article suggests they are Mk XIVs, not MkIIs.

Hope someone with deep pockets can keep them all together.
overstress is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:44
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: formally Cyprus, now UK
Posts: 346
Truely fascinating news if true. Good of the PM to get personally involved. Doubt the reports of them being Mk2's being true though. Most probably much later marks. Mk2's were well obsolete by then, and probably not even shipped to Burma in the first place. Our friend Peter will probably confirm this.
cyflyer is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:49
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 197
Caroline Grace will put a stop to it
Vizsla is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2012, 09:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Kent, UK.
Posts: 332
There is a suggestion elsewhere to convert them to SEAfires for the new carriers.
mmitch.
mmitch is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.