Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

Heads Up Vulcans Victors and Cuba

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Heads Up Vulcans Victors and Cuba

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2010, 19:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Swindon, Wilts,UK
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Heads Up Vulcans Victors and Cuba

Discovery Knowledge UK 21:00BST
Reveals how UK bombers stood by to take part in the bombing of the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War and the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Don't ask I haven't seen it yet either!
Windy Militant is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2010, 19:31
  #2 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I seem to recall they weren't used

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 11th Aug 2010, 19:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
But the Victors would have got there firstest with the mostest
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2010, 21:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West mids
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Valiant first and last

Maybe the Victor would have got there first, BUT never with the Mostest! The Valiant was armed with two weapons per aircraft not ONE as was the Victor!

Victor first yes; best Never!

I well recall that period, as I had never before seen all of Marham's Valiants nuclear armed before! This was all three Bomber Squadrons in the region of 24 aircraft! The weapons used were all thermo nuclear devices of variable yield, a capability which was never available with either Yellow Sun or Blue Steel weapons!

Yellow Sun yield circa 1 Mt One off carried
Blue Steel yield circa 1 Mt One off carried
Mk 28 yield variable Fm 70 Kt to 1.4Mt TWO off carried
ValiantXD818 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 13:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the Bay, Vic, Oz
Age: 80
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got it all wrong. It was the Vulcan that made the difference.
alisoncc is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 16:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Interesting, 818, certainly didnt know that about carrying two! I think the Victor had the biggest conventional bomb load, but thats not quite relevant in this case.

Cant imagine what the procedures for delivering two weapons would be - two fairly adjacent targets?
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 21:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the Bay, Vic, Oz
Age: 80
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TTN wrote:
Cant imagine what the procedures for delivering two weapons would be - two fairly adjacent targets?
A bit like suicide bombers. One was to get their attention, the second for those who came to look.

Last edited by alisoncc; 14th Aug 2010 at 00:16. Reason: Correct grammar
alisoncc is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 21:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West mids
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cuba cont:

I didn't get it all wrong at all..............there were only two Vulcan Sqns declared Nuclear capable at that time! Check it out!
ValiantXD818 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2010, 22:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West mids
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cuba Again

You guys may think that this was all a lot of baloney and over reaction, but I can reassure you all, that at the time it was NO JOKE. None of us ever thought that Kruschev of all people, would ever have backed down, but he had the balls to, thank God! Kennedy was over reacting to something that the US had been building for many years and that was the complete encirclement of the USSR [as was]. We in Europe and the Russians too would have had very little warning of anything incoming. When the Russians did the same to the Americans [Cuban missile sites] then things took on a different light and they [the Americans] didn't like it one little bit. Most of us thought that we would actually GO at that time and just sat around waiting for the OFF!
ValiantXD818 is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2010, 00:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: On the Bay, Vic, Oz
Age: 80
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys may think that this was all a lot of baloney and over reaction, but I can reassure you all, that at the time it was NO JOKE
I would suggest that very few of us here thought it was baloney, with most having taken it very seriously, me included. There have been quite a few threads where "Mickey's" and "Mickey Finns" get a mention.

De-icing our B2's at 3.00 in the morning in January at a Yorkshire airfield was not a lot of fun.
alisoncc is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2010, 15:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
XD818,

Slightly off thread, I was on 214 Sqdn at Marham from Jan 59 but would you believe that after all of the Micky Finn's and such, I was posted from 214 Sqdn to Akrotiri arriving on the 14th Oct '62 so I just missed all of the fun.
ian16th is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.