Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

windmilling propellers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2010, 20:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: sussex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
windmilling propellers

I cannot convince a non-aircrew colleague of mine that on large supercharged piston engines with constant-speed-propellers, if you lost an engine during cruise due to fuel starvation, it would continue to windmill at the selected rpm with accompanying boost (manifold pressure) and oil pressure. The only indication of the engine failure -if you missed the initial hiccup of parameters - would be the falling cylinder-head or coolant temperature and yaw and decay of airspeed.
Can anyone point me in the direction of getting written confirmation of this ???
virgo is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 20:47
  #2 (permalink)  
Cool Mod
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18nm N of LGW
Posts: 6,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to think about this a bit, but you would not want a windmilling prop! It needs to be feathered (so that its blades are edge on to the wind) because of drag. Apart from the correct drills sequence this the first most important action.
PPRuNe Pop is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 21:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: sussex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Pop............Yeah, we all know that !
My point is that if you had a somewhat sloppy (or very tired) flight-crew, it's quite possible to miss the moment of engine failure and as a result of the characteristics described, they can continue flying around for some time before the penny drops that they've lost an engine.
Please don't say it couldn't happen...........it has !
virgo is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 22:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North UK
Posts: 324
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
That seario assumes no pitch stops that would prevent the CS units driving the prop into the beta range for windmilling.
DH106 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 06:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Station 42
Age: 69
Posts: 1,081
Received 93 Likes on 39 Posts
Apparently this situation would reveal itself with the Cessna 336/337 twin (centreline thrust push/pull configuration) if the rear engine failed. Obviously there would be no yaw to alert the pilot as to the reason for reduced performance.
stevef is online now  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 14:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall being told by an ex Shackleton AE that a Griffon would often fail in the air with no clues from the the RPM indicator. The only immediate clue was the loss of boost pressure. It seemed logical at the time but did I remember him wrongly?
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 17:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North UK
Posts: 324
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Depends on how the boost was achieved - on an exhaust driven turbocharger you'd see a boost loss, but on a mechanically driven supercharger should maintain the boost as it's all still turning at the same speed. Was the Griffin turbo- or supercharged?
DH106 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 18:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Station 42
Age: 69
Posts: 1,081
Received 93 Likes on 39 Posts
Shack's Griffon - single-stage, two-speed, mechanically supercharged, I believe.
I agree that CHT is the best indication of a failed governed engine (discounting yaw & a/s ) as Virgo says.
stevef is online now  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 18:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 109
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does this not depend upon how the propeller controller functions? It seams reasonable to expect the control mechanism to react to the reversed torque, even to "auto-feather" I don't know anything about propeller control mechanics, any Rotol / Hamilton Standard experts out there?
Some piston engines have torque metering, to directly indicate what is going on.
Rory57 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 19:48
  #10 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Similar to the Cessna 337, the BN Trislander had a centreline-thrust engine. If it failed, there was no indication until the CHT and oil temp dropped. I know; it happened to me. There was a light which would indicate a loss of RPM on take-off; can't remember the figure. It caused consternation during taxy since the passengers could see this light winking, above a sign saying "No2 Engine Failure"
Herod is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 22:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A DC4 pilot told me in the sixties, that the first indication you have if you arent watching the engine instruments carefully, is a decrease in airspeed of about ten knots.
Sounds like it happened.
sixtiesrelic is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 11:53
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: sussex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for your inputs........it's nice to have some confirmation.

These youngsters aren't quite as knowledgeable as they sometimes think they are !
virgo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.