Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

RAF Canberra losses during Suez

Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

RAF Canberra losses during Suez

Old 22nd Apr 2010, 08:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bucks
Age: 46
Posts: 5
RAF Canberra losses during Suez

Hello Gents,

This is my first post on here. I am hoping to tap into your knowledge and wisdom!

Basically, I am looking for as much info as possible regarding RAF Canberra losses during the Suez crisis. This includes aircraft lost in accidents, specifically WT371, a B.6 of 9 Sqn attached to RAF Nicosia.

All/Any help appreciated. Its for a good cause as well.

Cheers

Mark
PltOffMW is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 09:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: due south
Posts: 1,333
PltOffMW, the entry in Broken Wings reads as follows.

6.11.56--Canberra B6--WT371--139 Sqn--Nicosia, Cyprus-- Control lost on asymmetric approach; rolled and dived into ground--(3) fatal
henry crun is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 10:08
  #3 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 88
Posts: 2,206
From RAF Cat5 listings

6/11/56 WH799 Canberra PR7 58 Sqn Off the west coastal area of Syria

The aircraft was on a recce mission during the Suez conflict. Shot down by a Syrian MiG.

For details of crew PM me
John Farley is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 10:09
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bucks
Age: 46
Posts: 5
Thanks Henry.

The issue I have is that the record I have seen has him with 9 Sqn who were attached to RAF Nicosia from Binbrook with the B.6. 139 Sqn was a Pathfinders Sqn based, I believe at Hemswell, and also flying the Canberra. I am struggling to establish which Sqn the aircraft was with when it crashed.

Mark
PltOffMW is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 10:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,043
You should get all you need from the National Archives. I don't know why the link says as below, but it works.

Detecting your browser settings
forget is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 15:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxon
Age: 90
Posts: 259
I watched the accident of WT371 from the cockpit of my Hunter sitting on the readiness platform at Nicosia. It rolled to starboard. Had the other engine been failed instead it would have taken out at least two of us strapped in our aircraft. The ORP was at right angles to the runway and we were positioned looking at the approach.
26er is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 16:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bedale, North Yorkshire
Age: 66
Posts: 1,095
I was told a story that one Canberra chap totally disagreed with the whole Suez thing. To avoid bombing Egyptians, he selected 'gear up' whilst lining up on the runway. The aircraft settled onto the piano keys and effectively blocked the runway preventing the bomber stream from taking off.

Any truth?
taxydual is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 18:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 71
Posts: 0
The version I had is that he deliberately ran off the runway whailst retracting the gear. THe truth/facts are out there somewhere.
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 18:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chedburgh, Bury St.Edmunds
Age: 78
Posts: 1,129
The gear certainly was deliberately retracted. I think he was court martialled. I remember reading it in the Telegraph at the time. [Excellent memory for things long ago, can't even remember what I had for dinner yesterday]
JEM60 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 19:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,043
Some details here

CYPRUS: Grounded Bomber - TIME

The Glasgow Herald - Google News Archive Search

Last edited by forget; 22nd Apr 2010 at 19:31.
forget is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2010, 10:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: River Thames & Surrey
Age: 72
Posts: 9,104
Another one I heard was that when they were going to attack Port Said, they called ATC for QDMs then bombed it!!
chevvron is online now  
Old 23rd Apr 2010, 18:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 90
To answer the original question, WT371 was a 139 Sqn aircraft being flown by a 9 Sqn ferry crew.
redsetter is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 12:10
  #13 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 78
Posts: 16,751
chevron, I heard that too not long after the event, say 9 years or so.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 14:09
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bucks
Age: 46
Posts: 5
Thanks gents, some really interesting and useful stuff there.

Redsetter, how/where did you get that nuggest of information from?! That makes total sense as to why I couldnt establish the squadron in question.

Mark
PltOffMW is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2010, 19:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 90
From the 139 Sqn ORB. The pilot was 9 Sqn but the other crew may have been from another squadron. Ferried in a replacement aircraft to Nicosia and were ferrying back a battle-damaged aircraft.
redsetter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.