Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Gnat alternatives

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2009, 08:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Devon
Age: 68
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gnat alternatives = HAI Ajeet
Bigt is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 08:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello Chaps,

I remember STUPRECC and CUBSTUN (though IIRC, the speed envelope was <400/.85M). Also that chubby-thighed QFIs in goon-suits had problems getting full aileron on. I also remember a certain Flt Cdr who carried a Nav Ruler in his calf pocket, with which he used to poke unwary studes in the back of the head. Do any of you Chaps recall that the current CDS was a Creamie Gnat QFI as a Fg Off back then?
27mm is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 09:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: london
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why, or What Instead of Gnat T.1

FG Miles M.100 Student.
W.E.W.Petter left EE in February,1950 to be MD at Folland, which was then in GW, and subbing DH wings (Vampire, Dove, Chipmunk). He was able to fund Midge as expendable (he said, affordable) Stuka - US DoD later took the idea up for its poorer Allies as Northrop F-5, adapted 1959 as USAF Advanced trainer T-38. MoS funded Folland for 6 Gnat F.1, similarly for Allies, to be sold to Yugoslavia, Finland and India (Ajeet). In 1957 RAF's all-through Jet Provost notion, replacing Provost+Vampire T.11, had already become dubious, and tenders were invited for an affordable mount above JP, below OCU type (Hunter T.7, Javelin T.3, Lightning T.4). Miles, working from a shed, and Folland bid; Folland won, with an order for 14 Development Batch in 1958. MoS' policy was industry "coalescence". Folland sold out to HSAL, September,1959; Petter fled to a Swiss hermitage; in 1960 orders, in all to 105, did flow. T-38 would have involved scarce $. Hunters were being converted to FGA.9/FR.10, RN T.8/GA.11, and export.


Care to translate that dog's breakfast into human understandable information?
tornadoken is offline  
Old 28th May 2009, 21:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,858
Received 334 Likes on 116 Posts
With the tailplane still powered hydraulically, I'm sure that with the elevators unlocked (click, click, white band, ELEV caption), there was a 300/M0.7 flutter limit? Whereas for a hyd fail, the tailplane was moved electrically and 400/M0.85 was the limit for unlock.

We'll be on to the joys of Cam K, Q-gearing, Datum Shift and Scissor Restrictors next.

Not to mention Fuse 13!
BEagle is online now  
Old 29th May 2009, 07:49
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fife
Age: 87
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We'll be on to the joys of Cam K
During the CFS Course I asked why Cam K was so named & was told that Cams A to J didn't work. I know memory fades with encroaching senility, but IIRC the limiting IAS for flying in follow up was the same 400k as for unlocking the elevator in the STUPRE, STUPREC, STUPRECC drill.

Mnemonic creep as aircraft were progressively modified might make an interesting thread on its own account; in the early days on the Javelin a traditional TAFFIOH sufficed pre-take-off, but towards the end of the Mark 9 it had expanded to something I can't recall (a forgettable Mnemonic!). It was something like TAFFIGWROSHHH, I wonder whether anyone can remember what it was?
NutherA2 is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 09:45
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Do any of you Chaps recall that the current CDS was a Creamie Gnat QFI as a Fg Off back then?"

....and what does cream do after a while? It curdles, goes off and smells...

Under desk go! Anti-flak armed, incoming.....

LM (A2)
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 29th May 2009, 14:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Far too much QFI speak on this thread!!

Just shout "HASELL" and pull up into a loop!!!

Flack jacket on and off to the river!
newt is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 11:41
  #28 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just shout "HASELL" and pull up into a loop!!!
- sounds as if you knew the one-eared M Pilot Jacko?
BOAC is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 19:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bristol
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I thought the Gnat was an excelent swept wing advanced trainer. The Hunter was just too nice - like a big jet Provost. The Gnat, on the other hand, had to be flown and landed with carefull regard to high drag and adverse yaw at high angles of attack. It was difficult to fly accurately straight and level, but when you got dug in with some G it settled down nicely.

And the instrument fit was super. Just what was needed to bring IF standards in the fast jet world up to some level of competence.

Dick
Dick Whittingham is offline  
Old 30th May 2009, 20:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All sounds very fascinating, but just curious, was it awkward ground handling, ie TO and LDG with such a narrow main-gear track?
Centreline747 is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 07:24
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: down south
Age: 77
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Far too much QFI speak on this thread!!

....and just where would you be without your Mother & QFIs.....?

Smoke off, go.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 15:22
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's not forget also the natty (sorry!) little brake chute on the Gnat - about the size of an average tablecloth, but still good training stuff for those destined for fats jets with 'em.
27mm is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 15:30
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,858
Received 334 Likes on 116 Posts
During the CFS Course I asked why Cam K was so named & was told that Cams A to J didn't work.


I thought that it was Output value = K x Input value , where K varies with control column deflexion angle as determined by the cam.

Whatever, it was a clever idea, but still a mite too sensitive at small deflexions for clumsy Bloggs such as me - until you got used to it. Although once when I flew a TACAN dive with 1 notch of flap by mistake, the whole aircraft felt much more pitch stable. Didn't the Reds use to fly it in that configuration?
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 16:14
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Asia's Fine City
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did the "Fuse 13" comment have anything to do with the removal of it causing an unexplained increase in roll rate?

And because the real reason for the increase in roll rate was never found it was decided not to remove the fuse. But with the “cat out of the bag” illicit action was that fuses were then purposely blown, reinserted into their holders and quietly ignored?

Please correct if mistaken.
kluge is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2009, 19:16
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...rate-fuse.html
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2009, 04:22
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Asia's Fine City
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent read FL - reading again and studying it - truly wonderful.

BEagle thanks for the posts in 2002 especially posts #20 and #23.
Excellent insights,

Jeez - I'll convert from gas.

Last edited by kluge; 3rd Jun 2009 at 14:06. Reason: ah,.now I'm starting to understand why it is said that the Gnat is a complex a/c
kluge is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2009, 11:05
  #37 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beagle
Didn't the Reds use to fly it in that configuration?
- yes - I cannot rcall if there was any IAS/M limit
BOAC is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2009, 19:11
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One Eared M Plt

I remembered this episode after seeing the earlier reference to Jacko .....

My mate (and adjacent service number) Iain A-R, sadly no longer with us, was rostered to fly his JP Final Nav Test with said M Plt, who was either on the other Squadron or in Standards.. "Show us your map, Lad", said J, and took Iain's absolutely immaculately prepared map, Hmmed, and gave Iain the dog-eared ditto from his flying suit pocket. "Fly it on that, Lad" he said. "Why?", said Iain. "Your Dad (then also a QFI at, I think, Feltwell) bollocked me for being late for Pay parade in 1948" said Jacko.

Iain flew the Nav Test very well (as he did most things) and they returned to the crew room. "Want to know how you did, Lad?" asked the One Eared M Plt - "Bloody well - 90%+) as I recall. And they went their separate ways.
Wander00 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.