Silhouette challenge
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: either CET or GMT
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, http://www.pprune.org/aviation-histo...ml#post6505202
I stand corrected.
Also I see TC asked him the same thing on the 6th of june 2011, but got no answer.
I stand corrected.
Also I see TC asked him the same thing on the 6th of june 2011, but got no answer.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dharan
Age: 66
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back now
to save answering each question they're all wrong. Time the shopping to coincide with the end of afternoon prayers. Not so busy.
Not Taurus, not Hercules
y had Taurus engines in one version
x had Mercurys
Specs wrong too not a pure bomber spec.
Bargains irresistible!!
Figure out what x and y were!!
to save answering each question they're all wrong. Time the shopping to coincide with the end of afternoon prayers. Not so busy.
Not Taurus, not Hercules
y had Taurus engines in one version
x had Mercurys
Specs wrong too not a pure bomber spec.
Bargains irresistible!!
Figure out what x and y were!!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dharan
Age: 66
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Happy pass has it!!
The Bristol Type 149
proposed to specG.24/35 for a new General reconnaissance Bomber
Not acceptedand combined with the
Type 150 proposal to give the Type 152 Beaufort
The Bristol Type 149
proposed to specG.24/35 for a new General reconnaissance Bomber
Not acceptedand combined with the
Type 150 proposal to give the Type 152 Beaufort
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: either CET or GMT
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I always feel uncomfortable when I have to make an id without finding any plan view, making it all guesswork (based on wikipedia... 
)
Thanks buttrick!
It'll have to to be OH unfortunately, as I have an appointment soon.
LM, are you standing too? that makes three!
)Thanks buttrick!
It'll have to to be OH unfortunately, as I have an appointment soon.
LM, are you standing too? that makes three!
