VA pilots threatened with AWARD wages
Contrary to popular belief, A NO VOTE DOES NOT MEAN VA PILOTS WILL AUTOMATICALLY GO TO THE AWARD! (I would have more sympathy if the new owners weren't raking in over $106 BILLION in annual revenue!!)
VA would need to make an application to Fair Work Commission (a lengthy and complicated process that will take years)! Further, the Fair Work Act sets a VERY HIGH BAR when it comes to terminating an EA, i.e:
|
It’s in every pilots best interest to support the Virgin Pilot group and ensure a sub par agreement isn’t voted in.
There is simply no viable reason why pay or conditions should be less then what they are now. Any Union advising members to vote in a worse EA then what they’re on now needs to be named and shamed so their members can send emails denouncing any such advice. |
Which union suggested we vote this up again?
|
Originally Posted by Packvalve;[url=tel:11087234
11087234[/url]]The Unions have rolled over and are now citing cases that are in stark contrast to what is happening at VA
They have both given opinions (as they are entitled to). Take it or don’t take it, but it will be the majority of the Pilots only who will decide. So if gets up, be pissed off that you are in the minority and the bulk of your colleagues don’t agree with you. Either way, singing your tune for the pprune rumour folk won’t change anything. It just makes you smell of desperation and takes credibility away from your argument. |
Just to be clear, the unions have not said that a No vote will automatically mean a return to the award. Neither has the company. The risk is there and there will be some more hurdles before they get to that point, but the unions have explained that very clearly. It appears that the OP can’t read and digest information unemotionally.
|
No company is going to go to FW after 2 rounds of negotiating lol.. the first offer will always be low, although it seems the subsequent offer made by Virgin was even worse.. Pilots needs to stand up for themselves. I agree with the OP, call their bluff, that's the only way they're going to come back with better terms.
Consider contributing some $$ into the kitty and taking all the info to a lawyer to get some impartial legal advice. It's shocking the unions are endorsing it after the second round of negotiations.. they sound like they're over it too.. |
There is simply no viable reason why pay or conditions should be less then what they are now. |
Yep, be happy you lot have a job. Many of us lost ours….
|
Originally Posted by ACMS
(Post 11087524)
Yep, be happy you lot have a job. Many of us lost ours….
|
Originally Posted by ACMS
(Post 11087524)
Yep, be happy you lot have a job. Many of us lost ours….
This paycut will be used as an example by every management team from every other Australian company to lower wages. QF management have already publicly made it known that whatever the percentage reduction that Virgin crew get, they will expect the same for all their entities. 18 months from now when everyone has been re-hired and we’re all on overtime (at 10%+ less pay) you will regret reducing your wages. Remember the folks that are pushing a reduction in pay are the over 60s who’ve already paid off their house and own the big boat/caravan/whatever and are simply trying to get through a few more years until retirement… |
aussieflyboy please have a look at
https://writingexplained.org/payed-or-paid-difference |
Originally Posted by turbantime
(Post 11087443)
Just to be clear, the unions have not said that a No vote will automatically mean a return to the award. Neither has the company. The risk is there and there will be some more hurdles before they get to that point, but the unions have explained that very clearly.
What's astounding is that in the latest proposal, they've binned the DTA and reduced the salary of some of the pilots to give to another group of pilots, presumably to increase management's salary.. they're clearly shifting money around to benefit one group at the expense of the other. A NO vote is simply a response to a **** deal and a long way from PIA (which nobody wants) and will simply result in a continuation of the current EA. |
Packvalve is spot on.
|
Originally Posted by non_state_actor
(Post 11087474)
OK let's hear it then. The company was bankrupt. There are 1000's of unemployed pilots sitting around not to mention expats. Explain why you are so valuable in the current climate.........
Massive over supply of crew desperate to work and under demand of travel from the public is going to result in a potential race to the bottom again til things really turn around, and that seems like it’s getting much further away by the day right now. |
Originally Posted by LostWanderer
(Post 11087592)
Yep. Unfortunately the reality is in a COVID world that we as pilots no longer hold any kind of advantage in pay negotiations and every airlines management in the country knows it, despite how valuable any of us believe ourselves to be. Not saying I like it one bit but it’s just the reality of the situation.
Massive over supply of crew desperate to work and under demand of travel from the public is going to result in a potential race to the bottom again til things really turn around, and that seems like it’s getting much further away by the day right now. |
"raking in over $106 BILLION in annual revenue!!"
Where did this figure regarding "revenue" come from? No one wants to earn less guaranteed money but so long as the work is there the minimum credit won't be a problem. If the work is NOT there, do you think it's reasonable to work 50 hours but be paid for 70? The offer is a fundamental change but there have been some lifestyle wins by the unions and its something to build on in future. |
Originally Posted by LostWanderer
(Post 11087592)
Yep. Unfortunately the reality is in a COVID world that we as pilots no longer hold any kind of advantage in pay negotiations and every airlines management in the country knows it, despite how valuable any of us believe ourselves to be. Not saying I like it one bit but it’s just the reality of the situation.
Massive over supply of crew desperate to work and under demand of travel from the public is going to result in a potential race to the bottom again til things really turn around, and that seems like it’s getting much further away by the day right now. |
Back in the 1990s, working in GA we used to dream of getting the award as there were many employers who didn't even pay the legal minimum.
A deal needs to be struck, where pay and conditions are realistic and enable the company to survive the present situation, but don't set a precedent for the future when normality returns. There needs to be a provision for when profitability returns. |
Originally Posted by LostWanderer
(Post 11087592)
Y
Massive over supply of crew desperate to work and under demand of travel from the public Many of us have flights booked, flight credits with both Virgin and Jetstar (that we could not use) and even cruises booked - no shortage of demand! |
Originally Posted by Capt Basil Brush
(Post 11087823)
Question. If you fly 70 hours/mth on the current EBA, and 70 hours/mth on the proposed EBA, what is the pay difference?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:10. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.