PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Covid Shot - Side Effects? (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/639935-covid-shot-side-effects.html)

BaronG 28th Apr 2021 06:01


Originally Posted by Car RAMROD (Post 11029670)
Casa advice https://www.casa.gov.au/licences-and...al-specialists




Have had 2x Pfizer. 24hr grounding after each (as it happened I didn’t have to fly for a longer period than that).
slight discomfort at the injection site for maybe up to 36hrs but a stubbed toe hurts more. otherwise fine.


To compare, moderna vaccine, FAA requires minimum 48hours.


Yep this is my experience too after the 1st jab 2 days ago with Pfizer/BioNTech.

Asturias56 28th Apr 2021 07:01

"To all of you, please remember that all those Covid-19 vaccines have only been granted an emergency use authorization and that clinical trials are still ongoing. "

There's a pandemic on - hundreds of thousands in hospitals, people dead all all over the shop - look what happened in Spain, Italy and now India

17 million people in EU injected with Astra Zeneca- 37 cases of blood clots - and they can't say if they might have had blood clots anyway. Latest evidence shows that a single shot reduces your chance of passing on the disease by over 50%

The best thing you can do for yourself, your family and your community is to get vaccinated as fast as possible

jolihokistix 28th Apr 2021 07:25

Flash news.
My letter arrived yesterday, with instructions to book my first shot (bookings over the phone only) from 10 May onwards, if one can get through.
The government hopes to have most of the over-65s vaccinated with their first shot by the end of July. Fasten your seatbelts, folks of all sexual orientations identities!

Scooter Rassmussin 28th Apr 2021 08:17

Ill for 7 Days after AZ shot , Reported CASA medical , grounded pending further tests .

Auxtank 29th Apr 2021 11:41


Originally Posted by redsnail (Post 11029627)
In EASA land, they recommend 48 hours no fly post jab.
I had the AZ jab and I needed those 48 hours off. I had Covid a year ago, so did Checkboard, although, we experienced different symptoms.
About 7-8 hours after the jab, the chills kicked in, then felt hot, this cycled all the way through the night plus felt nauseous too. By morning, that had gone away but was left with a headache that wouldn't budge and fatigue that didn't let up until the evening. Headache finally went away. The next day, just very tired. Slight tenderness under the arm, jab site, fine.
Checkboard (who is long covid with altered sense of smell and taste), very mild chills and fever but had bad joint/back pain for about a day.

Can't wait for the second one... It should be better...

I had these exact symptoms after my first jab in mid February. I wasn't "meself" for three days in total.
I have been told the sides you get on your first one could be the same only slightly worse on the second jab.
I have just been invited by my surgery to book it. I am hesitating. . .but will get it. I'm just making sure I have a window of three days with no commitments whatsoever.

pulse1 29th Apr 2021 17:25

My wife and I have had two Pfizer jabs with no after effects. Our daughter had one AZ jab and a day later experienced a pain in the chest and in her left arm. It passed after an hour or so but she went to see her doctor. The doctor did nothing and told her to go to A & E if it happened again. She did get checked out by the hospital and all was fine. She has been fine since. She is concerned about taking her second jab when it comes up.

Auxtank 29th Apr 2021 18:59

Oh just tell her to get it.
I was absolutely grounded after my AZ jab for about 3 days - but, and here's the thing - you're not really ill - it's your own immune system kicking in and giving you the symptoms. You're fine but you FEEL awful. And I really did feel absolutely awful.

Since my original post a few hours ago I have booked my 2nd jab for Wednesday next week. I shall get the DVD's ready to load and just spend 48 hours on the sofa.

As my dear old 82 year old mother coined it; "Don't be a clot, get the shot."

Transition Layer 29th Apr 2021 22:50


Originally Posted by Auxtank (Post 11036093)
Oh just tell her to get it.
I was absolutely grounded after my AZ jab for about 3 days - but, and here's the thing - you're not really ill - it's your own immune system kicking in and giving you the symptoms. You're fine but you FEEL awful. And I really did feel absolutely awful.

Since my original post a few hours ago I have booked my 2nd jab for Wednesday next week. I shall get the DVD's ready to load and just spend 48 hours on the sofa.

As my dear old 82 year old mother coined it; "Don't be a clot, get the shot."

DVDs? I didn’t think Covid was around back in 2003

clark y 29th Apr 2021 23:35

Hey Auxtank, the use of the word CLOT in your mum's slogan is interesting. She must be quick witted.

AEROMEDIC 30th Apr 2021 08:39

Had the jab a few weeks ago. No problems other than feeling a little tired and minor muscular aches. Both of these I’d normally put down to celebrating.
Can’t wait for the second one, and in the meantime, I’ve had a seasonal flu shot. 😎👍

EvaDestruction 30th Apr 2021 14:54

I see no need to take a dangerous experimental drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate.

I've been exposed to it during the last year numerous times, with my barber and many other friends and acquaintances having been infected. I do supplement, and so my immune system is strong.

Considering the ample evidence of the fraudulent nature of this planned event, I will have no part of it. I will not be a guinea pig for Fauci and Pharma.

Asturias56 30th Apr 2021 16:20

"I see no need to take a dangerous experimental drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate."

Firstly its not dangerous - a billion people have had shots and as far as I know they're not falling over dead or even sick in any significant numbers

50% of the population in the UK has had a shot - and I can't see people setting up cremations in the street as you can see in India - death rates are down to 15 a day.

problem isn't survival - it's the fact the hospital system gets overrun


You also have duty to protect your family, neighbours and work mates by having a shot

DHfan 30th Apr 2021 16:45


Originally Posted by EvaDestruction (Post 11036518)
I see no need to take a dangerous experimental drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate.

I've been exposed to it during the last year numerous times, with my barber and many other friends and acquaintances having been infected. I do supplement, and so my immune system is strong.

Considering the ample evidence of the fraudulent nature of this planned event, I will have no part of it. I will not be a guinea pig for Fauci and Pharma.

As you obviously believe it's all a conspiracy, I shall ignore your entire post.

halfmoon 30th Apr 2021 17:48

What are the latest stats? One elderly covid death year to date in Australia, 2 vaccine deaths...
enough said

EvaDestruction 30th Apr 2021 19:10


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11036553)
"I see no need to take a dangerous experimental drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate."

Firstly its not dangerous - a billion people have had shots and as far as I know they're not falling over dead or even sick in any significant numbers

50% of the population in the UK has had a shot - and I can't see people setting up cremations in the street as you can see in India - death rates are down to 15 a day.

problem isn't survival - it's the fact the hospital system gets overrun


You also have duty to protect your family, neighbours and work mates by having a shot

If it's not dangerous, why did a friend of a friend (here in the US) die 4 hours after injection? If it's not dangerous, why is it released (here in the US) under Emergency Use Authorization? If it's not dangerous, why did a Miami Beach doctor die 2 weeks after the shots of a strange blood disease? If it's not dangerous, why are there pregnant women in significant numbers losing their pregnancies?

Because this is not a true vaccine but instead gene therapy never tried on humans before, the short term effects are fairly minor compared to the potential long term effects. We are essentially walking in uncharted territory, as no humans have ever received such medical devices.

Again I pose the question: why should a person with a healthy immune system (like me) take an experimental and dangerous gene editing drug cocktail to supposedly (it doesn't) protect me from a virus that has a 99% survival rate?

That is a question you would rather not answer, and I certainly understand why.

A legislator in the state of Arizona, female last name Hernandez, took the series of shots and about 2 weeks later came down with a full blown infection with all the symptoms. Her story was covered by RT a few days ago.

Besides being dangerous and experimental, it doesn't work. There has never been a successful vaccination against coronavirus. In attempts to develop one, all the animals being tested died when infected.

I see no compelling need to take an experimental and dangerous drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate, a virus that has been blowing around this part of Florida for more than a year that never seemed to bother me. I won't be a crash test dummy for the pharmaceutical companies.

All the best.

Australopithecus 30th Apr 2021 20:52

Where is the “ ignore this idiot” button?

SixDemonBag 30th Apr 2021 20:52

This is worse than qrewroom 😞

eagleflyer 30th Apr 2021 20:55

Took my first AZ shot the other day. No nothing for me....but talking to my colleagues the spread goes from nothing to 39°C fever and feeling sick for three days.

Auxtank 30th Apr 2021 21:53


Originally Posted by clark y (Post 11036210)
Hey Auxtank, the use of the word CLOT in your mum's slogan is interesting. She must be quick witted.

Quicker than you evidently.

JJ 789 30th Apr 2021 22:46


Originally Posted by EvaDestruction (Post 11036610)
If it's not dangerous, why did a friend of a friend (here in the US) die 4 hours after injection? If it's not dangerous, why is it released (here in the US) under Emergency Use Authorization? If it's not dangerous, why did a Miami Beach doctor die 2 weeks after the shots of a strange blood disease? If it's not dangerous, why are there pregnant women in significant numbers losing their pregnancies?

Because this is not a true vaccine but instead gene therapy never tried on humans before, the short term effects are fairly minor compared to the potential long term effects. We are essentially walking in uncharted territory, as no humans have ever received such medical devices.

Again I pose the question: why should a person with a healthy immune system (like me) take an experimental and dangerous gene editing drug cocktail to supposedly (it doesn't) protect me from a virus that has a 99% survival rate?

That is a question you would rather not answer, and I certainly understand why.

A legislator in the state of Arizona, female last name Hernandez, took the series of shots and about 2 weeks later came down with a full blown infection with all the symptoms. Her story was covered by RT a few days ago.

Besides being dangerous and experimental, it doesn't work. There has never been a successful vaccination against coronavirus. In attempts to develop one, all the animals being tested died when infected.

I see no compelling need to take an experimental and dangerous drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate, a virus that has been blowing around this part of Florida for more than a year that never seemed to bother me. I won't be a crash test dummy for the pharmaceutical companies.

All the best.

I agree, I'll be giving it a few years at least until more data is gathered. Doesn't look like international travel from Australia will ramp up anytime in the foreseeable future... That's the drawcard for many people to get this "vaccine". Over the past month, many people who were going to get it when it was their turn are now saying they won't be now. So for people to be questioning it in relatively large numbers is telling...

dr dre 1st May 2021 00:28


Originally Posted by EvaDestruction (Post 11036610)
If it's not dangerous, why is it released (here in the US) under Emergency Use Authorization?

It isn't under an Emergency Authorisation in Australia. It was authorised after a complete assessment of data. It had to be given an expedited authorisation in the USA (safety tests were still completed however) as the virus was running rampant throughout the country. Killing up to 4000 per day.


If it's not dangerous, why did a Miami Beach doctor die 2 weeks after the shots of a strange blood disease?
He didn't. He passed away from natural causes, no proof the vaccine had a role.


If it's not dangerous, why are there pregnant women in significant numbers losing their pregnancies?
Because they aren't. Miscarriage is already quite common and no data the vaccine is increasing that rate.


Because this is not a true vaccine but instead gene therapy never tried on humans before
Vaccines aren't gene therapy. Even though the Covid vaccines aren't, Gene therapy in of itself is nothing to be afraid of, it is an exciting new way of combatting disease.


why should a person with a healthy immune system (like me) take an experimental and dangerous gene editing drug cocktail to supposedly (it doesn't) protect me from a virus that has a 99% survival rate?
Because the rate of death from vaccine is miniscule compare to the rate of death from Covid. Some facts. Risk of Covid death 5 times higher than vaccine for over 40s, 10 times higher for over 50s, 50 times higher for over 60s, 80 times higher for over 70s.

We've only one death in Australia that professionals have identified a link to the vaccine (that person had underlying conditions however). That's out of 2 million doses given. We have had about 30,000 Covid cases for 900 deaths. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the vaccine risk is virtually non existent compared to the infection risk.


That is a question you would rather not answer
I just did.


A legislator in the state of Arizona, female last name Hernandez, took the series of shots and about 2 weeks later came down with a full blown infection with all the symptoms. Her story was covered by RT a few days ago.
First off no one has ever claimed vaccines are 100% effective at stopping infection. They are effective at stopping severe disease, which is exactly what happened. The legislator you mentioned did not come down with a "full blown infection', as her fever only lasted a few hours. She has medical qualifications and acknowledges that her disease would have been worse without vaccination, and encourages people to get the jab.


Besides being dangerous and experimental, it doesn't work. There has never been a successful vaccination against coronavirus.
It works. Every scientific study produced shows the effectiveness of the vaccine. Cases cut by over 90%


I see no compelling need to take an experimental and dangerous drug to protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate, a virus that has been blowing around this part of Florida for more than a year that never seemed to bother me. .
Florida - 2.2 million cases, 35,000 deaths.
Australia - 30,000 cases, 900 dead.
Florida even has a lower population than Australia.

cloudsurfng 1st May 2021 01:38

Cannot wait until airlines have a ‘no jab no job’ policy. See how many miraculously change their minds when their job is on the line.


JJ 789 1st May 2021 04:16


Originally Posted by cloudsurfng (Post 11036727)
Cannot wait until airlines have a ‘no jab no job’ policy. See how many miraculously change their minds when their job is on the line.

Watch the jobseeker queue grow ...

dr dre 1st May 2021 05:56


Originally Posted by JJ 789 (Post 11036759)
Watch the jobseeker queue grow ...

The maximum Jobseeker payment is currently $330pw, or $17,000 pa.

So who's going to choose that option over a vaccine that gives 1 or 2 out of a million clotting issues, almost all with prior underlying conditions?

Going Nowhere 1st May 2021 07:16


Originally Posted by halfmoon (Post 11036592)
What are the latest stats? One elderly covid death year to date in Australia, 2 vaccine deaths...
enough said


EvaDestruction 1st May 2021 11:35

Dr. Dre

I'm glad things are coming up roses Down Under. And I'm glad you have a nice pair of Rose Colored Glasses on to view the world around you.

In the US and the rest of the world, they've been issued under EUA because there were no human tests done on them. Rather, the human tests are being done on a massive scale, on the public. As of about 3 weeks ago here in the US, more than half the population, 175 million out of 330, have been jabbed. Because no such gene-editing drugs have ever been administered to humans before, we are in uncharted territory. We have nothing to go on.

The few animal tests done with the drugs here in the US were done only on rats, and they quickly noticed that the pregnant rats lost their pregnancies. Apparently these dangerous cocktails have a strong influence on the placenta, as the same thing has happened here in the US to pregnant women, they lost their pregnancies.

So keep those Rose Colored Glasses fixed firmly to your face, because in the next 6 months or so it's very likely the stuff will be hitting the fan.

Call me cynical, but I don't see the advantage to taking a dangerous experimental shot to supposedly protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate. It doesn't make sense to me.

To Australopithecus, I'm sorry I rained on your parade. Life can be cruel you know, and too many times the bloody truth can be painful.

SOPS 1st May 2021 12:19


Originally Posted by EvaDestruction (Post 11036906)
Dr. Dre

I'm glad things are coming up roses Down Under. And I'm glad you have a nice pair of Rose Colored Glasses on to view the world around you.

In the US and the rest of the world, they've been issued under EUA because there were no human tests done on them. Rather, the human tests are being done on a massive scale, on the public. As of about 3 weeks ago here in the US, more than half the population, 175 million out of 330, have been jabbed. Because no such gene-editing drugs have ever been administered to humans before, we are in uncharted territory. We have nothing to go on.

The few animal tests done with the drugs here in the US were done only on rats, and they quickly noticed that the pregnant rats lost their pregnancies. Apparently these dangerous cocktails have a strong influence on the placenta, as the same thing has happened here in the US to pregnant women, they lost their pregnancies.

So keep those Rose Colored Glasses fixed firmly to your face, because in the next 6 months or so it's very likely the stuff will be hitting the fan.

Call me cynical, but I don't see the advantage to taking a dangerous experimental shot to supposedly protect against a virus with a 99% survival rate. It doesn't make sense to me.

To Australopithecus, I'm sorry I rained on your parade. Life can be cruel you know, and too many times the bloody truth can be painful.

Where is it shown that the vaccine alters your genes. I mean real proof. Not social media rubbish?

EvaDestruction 1st May 2021 14:29

SOPS

I'm sure you prefer to do your own thinking, and I'm happy to help provide you sources of knowledge on this matter.



DR. RYAN COLE: COVID-19, MRNA BIOWEAPON, IVERMECTIN, & VITAMIN D – The Phaser

Ryan Cole will help inform you, and there is also Dr. David E. Martin and many other physicians and healthcare scientists who can help explain how and why this is not a conventional vaccine we're dealing with. It is an unapproved, never before used on humans, cocktail of drugs.

Fools rush in where wise men fear to tread.

Best of luck in your search for knowledge.

Here is another site that might help. Physical Therapist Dies Two Days After Getting COVID-19 Shot in Indiana - The Vaccine Reaction

DHfan 1st May 2021 14:40

The previous poster was right. We need an "ignore the idiot" button.

dr dre 1st May 2021 15:27


Originally Posted by EvaDestruction (Post 11036977)
SOPS

I'm sure you prefer to do your own thinking, and I'm happy to help provide you sources of knowledge on this matter.

DR. RYAN COLE: COVID-19, MRNA BIOWEAPON, IVERMECTIN, & VITAMIN D – The Phaser

Ryan Cole will help inform you, and there is also Dr. David E. Martin and many other physicians and healthcare scientists who can help explain how and why this is not a conventional vaccine we're dealing with. It is an unapproved, never before used on humans, cocktail of drugs.

Fools rush in where wise men fear to tread.

Best of luck in your search for knowledge.

Here is another site that might help.

The Coroner's report on the Physical Therapist's death revealed she had diabetes and congestive heart disease.

Ryan Cole is a quack who has been frequently debunked.

David E Martin is a quack and a conspiracy theorist.

The Phaser and Vaccine Reaction are anti-vaxxer propaganda promotion sites.

You need to stop posting this dangerous rubbish.

Servo 2nd May 2021 00:22

We have been offered the Pfizer vaccine through work, under 1b. This is extended to my wife and two young adult children. All this information about clots and medical issues with CASA etc. really does have me second guessing whether I should subject my family and myself to possible problems.

kingRB 2nd May 2021 00:29


Originally Posted by dr dre (Post 11036997)
The Coroner's report on the Physical Therapist's death revealed she had diabetes and congestive heart disease.

Ryan Cole is a quack who has been frequently debunked.

David E Martin is a quack and a conspiracy theorist.

The Phaser and Vaccine Reaction are anti-vaxxer propaganda promotion sites.

You need to stop posting this dangerous rubbish.

Dre the problem is your "fact checker" Flora Teoh "debunking" someone is political in itself. She's from a wealthy Chinese family and has ties to many hard left political outlets and so called authorities. Her job literally is to monitor and control political discourse related to science.
She's not a medical Doctor and not qualified any more than anyone else to make assertive statements or interpretations on data. Health feedback.org claiming they are non partisan is laughable.

At this point all that's going on here is people pointing to the team they prefer - so lets stop pretending you're posting factual information over someone else, and drop this pathetic argument from authority fallacy.



dr dre 2nd May 2021 02:29


Originally Posted by kingRB (Post 11037183)
Dre the problem is your "fact checker" Flora Teoh "debunking" someone is political in itself. She's from a wealthy Chinese family and has ties to many hard left political outlets and so called authorities. Her job literally is to monitor and control political discourse related to science.
She's not a medical Doctor and not qualified any more than anyone else to make assertive statements or interpretations on data. Health feedback.org claiming they are non partisan is laughable.

At this point all that's going on here is people pointing to the team they prefer - so lets stop pretending you're posting factual information over someone else, and drop this pathetic argument from authority fallacy.

She's a part of IFCN. Worked for organisations that have received funding in part from Bill Gates, The WHO, The American Association for the Advancement of Science, a Singaporean technical university and the Singaporean Science Department. I guess in a conspiracy theorist's mind that makes her "far left". I guess in an anti-vaxxer's mind the opinions of anyone associated with government or or universities or who has been involved with research funded in part by big businesses should be excluded as they're "far left". That would basically rule out every legitimate scientist, and only leave the "truth tellers" huh?

Well let's see who else thinks Ryan Cole (a guy who specialises in skin conditions) and David E Martin (a financier and economist) are quacks?

Chief Medical Officer at a Hospital who's treated Covid patients

Multiple Infectious disease specialists and epidemiologists

Multiple professors and law specialists who debunk the claim the virus was "patented"

Stop pretending it's a 50/50 "both sides are equal" argument. There are legitimate medical and scientific voices. And there are quacks.

The "argument from authority" logical fallacy is actually what the anti-vaxxers do. Take the opinions of a guy who diagnoses skin conditions and a economist over the overwhelming body of epidemiology and infectious disease expertise.

dr dre 2nd May 2021 02:58


Originally Posted by Servo (Post 11037182)
We have been offered the Pfizer vaccine through work, under 1b. This is extended to my wife and two young adult children. All this information about clots and medical issues with CASA etc. really does have me second guessing whether I should subject my family and myself to possible problems.

Facts:

2.2 million doses administered Australia.

Pfizer negative reactions
One case of anaphylaxis in a person with a history of anaphylaxis
One case of a blood clot in a man with a history of DVT.

AZ negative reactions
4 cases of non fatal clots, link to vaccine or underlying conditions undetermined
2 cases of fatal clots in a person with diabetes and the second case where the TGA determined no link between vaccine and clots (up to 50 people per day report to Emergency Rooms in Australia with serious blood clots)

Out of 2.2 million vaccines, the majority of which were AZ.

So no deaths due to AZ proven to been caused by the vaccine in those without underlying conditions, and in those with underlying conditions it's about 1 in a million, so less chance than the risk of dying in a car crash, drowning, falling off a ladder, being hit by lightning or being murdered.

And you're eligible for the other one anyway.

turbantime 2nd May 2021 03:39

There needs to be thumbs up and thumbs down reaction buttons to posts. Dr Dre, 👍🏽 from me.
Anti-vaxxers, and conspiracy theorists in general, can’t be reasoned with.
Here’s an interesting podcast which was recorded pre-covid, figure out which side of the fence you sit on: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000dfqn

kingRB 2nd May 2021 04:50


Originally Posted by dr dre (Post 11037205)
She's a part of IFCN. Worked for organisations that have received funding in part from Bill Gates, The WHO, The American Association for the Advancement of Science, a Singaporean technical university and the Singaporean Science Department. I guess in a conspiracy theorist's mind that makes her "far left". I guess in an anti-vaxxer's mind the opinions of anyone associated with government or or universities or who has been involved with research funded in part by big businesses should be excluded as they're "far left". That would basically rule out every legitimate scientist, and only leave the "truth tellers" huh?

See the problem is you keep quoting these references like it legitimizes or non politicizes what she writes. I can at least see that politics can be influencing this - you and your bias can't - yet you keep posting like its fact.


Originally Posted by dr dre (Post 11037205)
Stop pretending it's a 50/50 "both sides are equal" argument. There are legitimate medical and scientific voices. And there are quacks.

The "argument from authority" logical fallacy is actually what the anti-vaxxers do. Take the opinions of a guy who diagnoses skin conditions and a economist over the overwhelming body of epidemiology and infectious disease expertise.

Why do you keep trying to conflate questions or contradictory evidence as "anti vaxx" and shut down conversation? It's intellectually lazy and a standard identity politics crap that's prolific these days. Do you genuinely believe people can't possibly hold a position that vaccines are a valid scientific process yet have concerns about a new one?


dr dre 2nd May 2021 05:27


Originally Posted by kingRB (Post 11037238)
See the problem is you keep quoting these references like it legitimizes or non politicizes what she writes. I can at least see that politics can be influencing this - you and your bias can't - yet you keep posting like its fact.
Why do you keep trying to conflate questions or contradictory evidence as "anti vaxx" and shut down conversation? It's intellectually lazy and a standard identity politics crap that's prolific these days.

I'll list the roles of those quoted in the articles I used to debunk the claims posted by the Skin Doctor and the Financier, including the article you believe is "hard left politics":

an infectious disease researcher at Colorado State University
clinical research fellow in viral immunology at the University of Cambridge
professor at Emory University’s School of Medicine

Chief Medical Officer at St. Luke's Health Systems
assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
associate professor of immunology and infectious diseases at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health
professor of nutrition and epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

infectious disease physician at Stanford Health Care
chair in population health and professor of epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh
researcher at Johns Hopkins University
senior scholar and senior scientist at the Center for Health Security

director of the CDC
HRSA spokesman
assistant professor of biostatistics at the University of Florida
director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
a professor in the College of Law at the University of Utah (to debunk that Covid patents existed prior to the pandemic)


Are they being "intellectually lazy" or sprouting "hard left identity politics"?


Do you genuinely believe people can't possibly hold a position that vaccines are a valid scientific process yet have concerns about a new one?
Concerns have to be founded in reality backed up by scientific and medical consensus. Not rubbish like "mRNA vaccines are gene therapy" sprouted on this thread.

Foxxster 2nd May 2021 06:31

I have posted this link before. It is for the official UK yellow card vaccine reporting. Ie any and all adverse reactions to covid vaccines. Details for astra and Pfizer. Remember the UK has administered tens of millions of jabs.

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...erse-reactions

stickshaken 2nd May 2021 07:04

Lots of reactions there that will take away your class 1 medical certificate.
And they are only the reported reactions.

dr dre 2nd May 2021 07:13


Originally Posted by stickshaken (Post 11037268)
Lots of reactions there that will take away your class 1 medical certificate.
And they are only the reported reactions.

"Lots of"??

The Yellow Card scheme is a mechanism by which anybody can voluntarily report any suspected adverse reactions or side effects to the vaccine. It is very important to note that a Yellow Card report does not necessarily mean the vaccine caused that reaction or event

Many suspected
ADRs reported on a Yellow Card do not have any relation to the vaccine or medicine and it is often coincidental that they both occurred around the same time.


The overall reporting rate is in the order of 3 to 6 Yellow Cards per 1,000 doses administered for the Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccines.For all COVID-19 vaccines, the overwhelming majority of reports relate to injection-site reactions (sore arm for example) and generalised symptoms such as ‘flu-like’ illness, headache, chills, fatigue (tiredness), nausea (feeling sick), fever, dizziness, weakness, aching muscles, and rapid heartbeat. Generally, these happen shortly after the vaccination and are not associated with more serious or lasting illness.

No, not "lots of" reactions that will take your Class 1 Medical away.


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:56.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.