Originally Posted by Roj approved
(Post 11020123)
Of all the operators in Australia, Alliance appears to be the only one that can actually "Organise a piss up in a Brewery".
So my bet is, the beginning of Fire Season 2021, they will have whatever aircraft required and be ready to operate. Good luck to them if this is actually true and not an April Fools Joke. |
GN.
The post may be a joke but its also on Fire Aviation? Conair tried using F27 Fire Bombers in France. They were short lived so I assume they were not a great success as they then moved on to CV580s. However if F50s are tried by Alliance or anyone else the development would not be to hard from F27 to F50 if used the Conair design? Conair and others seem to like the BAE146 into the future. Conair are also happy with Dash 8s. Wunwing |
Marie Bashir will be rather surprised to learn of her own death on Sky News today...
|
ASX website shows Alliance announcement that CASA has given regulatory approval to operate the E190, and a revised AOC has been issued.
Fleet update -43 Fokkers in revenue service, -commitments for 30 E190 deliveries, with 18 paid for and 5 delivered to Australia - the sim will be up and running by May, pilots currently being trained with Finnair in Helsinki. No mention in the media release of the team at Aliance checking with Pprune experts before making decisions on fleet purchases or pilot hiring. |
Originally Posted by cynphil
(Post 11018876)
TFH will not be happy! TR and NTR...
Are you another QF fanboy that seems to think some great injustice has taken place if anybody else is chosen over a Qantas pilot because you know, they are not Qantas!! I just hope the right people and most deserving get the job, regardless of their background! |
Originally Posted by Dookie on Drums
(Post 11018957)
Wow. So why weren't the Airnorth guys and gals given an acknowledgment? Genuine question as none as far as I'm aware were even acknowledged. Current on type etc
I would have though at least a couple Airnorth folks would have gotten an interview, given their recent experience with E170, current type rating that covers both 170/190 with differences training and they almost all live in Darwin, but as far as I am aware none did. The other possibility is that no Airnorth pilots applied.;) |
Stationair
If your comments on fleet type is aimed at me, then you have it wrong. I am only commenting on the NSWRFS contract that they are supposed to be receiving. As I read the current Alliance fleet, there are no current types that are approved for fire bombing? If we accept the statement on this thread that Alliance is being approved for the NSWRFS contract, then either they have to get B737 approval or they need another type? I'm not sure an orphan B737 is is viable? I am unaware that the F50, F100 or ejets are approved for fire bombing? I suspect if they intend to get fire bombing approval on a current type then this may be a bridge to far? Anyone going on this route should look up the sad tale of Minden Air attempting to put a Bae 146 in service. Wunwing. |
No Wunwing, comments weren't aimed at you.
|
Saw Alliance's 100 Years of Airforce Embraer land in Brisbane this morning. Has anyone got some photos? Looks incredible and has my vote for the best of their growing number of special paint jobs.
|
|
Originally Posted by Stationair8
(Post 11020241)
ASX website shows Alliance announcement that CASA has given regulatory approval to operate the E190, and a revised AOC has been issued.
Fleet update -43 Fokkers in revenue service, -commitments for 30 E190 deliveries, with 18 paid for and 5 delivered to Australia - the sim will be up and running by May, pilots currently being trained with Finnair in Helsinki. No mention in the media release of the team at Aliance checking with Pprune experts before making decisions on fleet purchases or pilot hiring. Joyce says 738s will be deployed on other routes! More like as the 738s with expensive leases come up for renewal,they wont be renewed. |
Originally Posted by blubak
(Post 11040222)
More like as the 738s with expensive leases come up for renewal,they wont be renewed.
That’s not the plan. QF will always need to have different tiers to serve the market - the premium carrier isn’t going anywhere, and the budget carriers are also here to stay. |
A lot of QFs B737 are coming up to 20 years so now is the time to retire them and get something new. QF will be after as much market share as they can get so dejavu to 2001.
|
QF has also said that a decision on the 737/regional jet would be made soon. Given both Airbus and Boeing have no shortage of stock to move, QF are probably well placed to grab either one for a good price.
Ejets to replace the 717’s look like a bit of a favourite. Who crews them is anyones guess. It looks like the Alliance/E190 op is the new version of how the NJS/Cobham/146/717 op has evolved over the years. |
Will the 8 aircraft be crewed by alliance or stood down QF pilots ? I think QF has been ramping up there A330 and B787 operations lately so maybe only A380 and ex B747 pilots are still stood down and available to transfer across.
|
Nah, I reckon Qantas/Alliance will run them E190’s out of Adelaide to Port Lincoln, Kingscote, Mt Gambier, Port Augusta, Whyalla just give REX the sh#ts.
|
It's a wet lease so I would presume Alliance crews.
|
Originally Posted by bangbounceboeing
(Post 11040662)
Will the 8 aircraft be crewed by alliance or stood down QF pilots ? I think QF has been ramping up there A330 and B787 operations lately so maybe only A380 and ex B747 pilots are still stood down and available to transfer across.
|
Ejets to replace the 717’s look like a bit of a favourite.
Who crews them is anyones guess. It looks like the Alliance/E190 op is the new version of how the NJS/Cobham/146/717 op has evolved over the years.[/QUOTE] Alliance Ejets are older then the B717 They will be crewed by Alliance as per wet lease agreement |
14 of them will. You have no guarantees after that.
|
Originally Posted by geeup
(Post 11040799)
Alliance Ejets are older then the B717
They will be crewed by Alliance as per wet lease agreement The Ejets range from 12.5 to 15.6 years. https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Alliance-Airlines https://www.planespotters.net/airline/QantasLink Are you sure you’re not talking about their Fokker fleet? I would also suggest that the dispatch reliability of Alliance is far greater. |
I would also suggest that the dispatch reliability of Alliance is far greater. |
Ejets to replace the 717s look like a bit of a favourite. |
Originally Posted by Going Nowhere
(Post 11040904)
The 717’s range from 15.2 to 21.5 years.
The Ejets range from 12.5 to 15.6 years. https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Alliance-Airlines https://www.planespotters.net/airline/QantasLink Are you sure you’re not talking about their Fokker fleet? I would also suggest that the dispatch reliability of Alliance is far greater. Alliance e190s are 2005 models ex COAP Qantas b717 are 2000 models ex Impulse |
Originally Posted by geeup
(Post 11041232)
Stand corrected.
Alliance e190s are 2005 models ex COAP Qantas b717 are 2000 models ex Impulse |
How good is Alliance?
They are so good that they’ve blindsided their E190 Darwin/Adelaide pilots and “negotiated” an outcome that has them earning less than Alliance F100 pilots. What’s more is that the base salary is below the award. AFAP have applied to get this “agreement” terminated as it does not meet the BOOT test in their view. This is nothing more than an opportunistic play at attempting to lower pilot conditions. They need to be called out on it. |
Who agreed to that?
|
Looking at the Modern award I get $160,542 for a Narrow Body Captain with the IFR and turbo jet allowances. I heard that they are getting $165K although I haven't seen a contract. Does that not meet the award then or is there something I have missed?
|
How does it compare to Network & Air North?
|
What are they paying for captains and FOs on the E190 at Alliance?
|
I believe the unions were completely unaware of this “agreement” until they stumbled across it on the FWC website.
I imagine it won’t be hard to have this piece of crap quashed. |
Originally Posted by turbantime
(Post 11044845)
How good is Alliance?
They are so good that they’ve blindsided their E190 Darwin/Adelaide pilots and “negotiated” an outcome that has them earning less than Alliance F100 pilots. What’s more is that the base salary is below the award. AFAP have applied to get this “agreement” terminated as it does not meet the BOOT test in their view. This is nothing more than an opportunistic play at attempting to lower pilot conditions. They need to be called out on it. |
Originally Posted by Double_Clutch
(Post 11044852)
Who agreed to that?
|
Originally Posted by TimmyTee
(Post 11044960)
Well, there are 2 pilots names at the end of the documents who signed off on them.
These guys would very well know that the Union had clearly not been involved, yet they are signatories to what’s arguably an all time low for a jet operator in Australia. And it’s not like Alliance are some small operator based in the middle of nowhere - they fly around 50 odd jets and have several hundred employees. It’s a disgrace and the individuals that sign these sub standard agreements should have a good hard look at themselves. |
I enquired some time ago about a DEC position onto the F100 when they were advertising for their Darwin base. I asked what the salary was, and then promptly laughed, told them it’s an absolute insult, and wished them luck.
No surprises. |
Originally Posted by Colonel_Klink
(Post 11045021)
And when do pilots start calling out those that sign off on these rubbish agreements?
These guys would very well know that the Union had clearly not been involved, yet they are signatories to what’s arguably an all time low for a jet operator in Australia. And it’s not like Alliance are some small operator based in the middle of nowhere - they fly around 50 odd jets and have several hundred employees. It’s a disgrace and the individuals that sign these sub standard agreements should have a good hard look at themselves. |
It’s disappointing to see an agreement like that. The only reason that Alliance are there is because the folks from NJS worked so hard when negotiating their agreement. QF obviously decided they were too expensive.
Remember NJS has their head office in ADL and had a DRW base for 30 odd years! Hopefully the folks at Alliance go hard at the next negotiation and try and get up to NJS’s pay level - they seem to be the gold standard of ‘100 seat Jet pay’ in Australia at the moment. |
You should have a good hard look at https://www.fairwork.gov.au/employee...and-harassment when you finish lecturing and trash talking others for choices they are entitled to make. |
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
(Post 11045094)
It's one thing to accept a sub par offer for yourself individually it's completely another to sign on behalf of everyone else.
|
What sub par?
It’s above the award? And seems to be what Network, Air North & Air Niugini, Virgin (Fokker) all pay. It’s a narrow body 100 seat domestic machine.. easiest job in the world! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:46. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.