PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   A DEBATE THAT MUST BE HAD (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/630898-debate-must-had.html)

itsnotthatbloodyhard 27th Mar 2020 04:35

Sunfish, you’ve made a number of recent posts about QF that haven’t included the specific word ‘Sydneycentric’ (if indeed it is a word). Could you please revert to normal practice? It’s spoiling the drinking game we’ve got going here.

normanton 27th Mar 2020 05:12


Originally Posted by Sunfish (Post 10729512)
Open the skies. Cut Qantas loose. We paid a premium to these Sydney thieves for thirty years. Qantas COSTS more jobs than its worth.

Back into that man cave thanks mate. You speak utter rubbish.

ABP 27th Mar 2020 21:08


Originally Posted by longjohn (Post 10729525)
So are we propping up Optus as well if it starts to wobble?
How about Coles or Woolies?

Yes I think they should! However, if one folds, it does not leave a monopoly. If VA or QF fold, it would. Aviation is a different industry that has a wide industry and consumer impact if a monopoly was to prevail.

longjohn 28th Mar 2020 07:47

I do not subscribe to the evil monopoly theory.

Firstly, you are talking Qantas Domestic and Jetstar Domestic?

Qantas International has competition, if anything VAI is barely worth mentioning in this regard.
QantasLink has REX
Network has Cobham, Skippers and Alliance.

So regulate them, or force them to sell Jetstar.

Efficient solutions that do not involve propping up inefficient foreign owned businesses with my tax $$

Chris2303 28th Mar 2020 21:06


Originally Posted by longjohn (Post 10730773)
So regulate them, or force them to sell Jetstar.

Sell JQ and it will close. There is too much provided to JQ by QF off balance sheet that JQ would never be able to afford

ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE 29th Mar 2020 03:57

how does QF subsidise JQ domestically? We’ve all heard the rumours about international losing money/being propped up by QF but I don’t think many people doubt the Aussie domestic operation is highly profitable

Des Dimona 29th Mar 2020 04:21

S&P has effectively placed VAH on a CCC credit watch with uncertainty and there may be questions of group survival beyond June with the existing cash reserves.

In view of the deputy PM's comments this morning about not nationalising airlines, if the government wants a competitive airline sector, this may present somewhat of a challenge.

Chris2303 29th Mar 2020 19:23


Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE (Post 10731652)
how does QF subsidise JQ domestically? We’ve all heard the rumours about international losing money/being propped up by QF but I don’t think many people doubt the Aussie domestic operation is highly profitable

It's been discussed on here before about maintenance and fuel being charged to QF

ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE 29th Mar 2020 21:25


Originally Posted by Chris2303 (Post 10732471)
It's been discussed on here before about maintenance and fuel being charged to QF

So because it’s been discussed on PPRUNE it has to true!!

with tiger essentially disappearing, JQ will be the sole LCC in the Aussie market. QF needs JQ to stop another operator setting up shop in Australia. We’ve already seen off TT and virgin blue so we must be doing something right.

JQ ain’t going anywhere

ddrwk 29th Mar 2020 22:46


Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE (Post 10732574)
So because it’s been discussed on PPRUNE it has to true!!

and yet you posed the initial question to this forum? :ugh:

ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE 29th Mar 2020 23:02


Originally Posted by ddrwk (Post 10732650)
and yet you posed the initial question to this forum? :ugh:

thats a fair point!

I guess what I was getting at was that there are some ideas that have been discussed so many times that guys convince themselves that they are facts.

My counter point would be why would qantas prop up a loss making entity for all these years and continuously lie to the ASX in the process (which is of course, illegal)?

Or is it maybe possible that Jetstar does in fact turn a profit.

SecretAngel 30th Mar 2020 02:24


Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE (Post 10732665)
thats a fair point!

I guess what I was getting at was that there are some ideas that have been discussed so many times that guys convince themselves that they are facts.

My counter point would be why would qantas prop up a loss making entity for all these years and continuously lie to the ASX in the process (which is of course, illegal)?

Or is it maybe possible that Jetstar does in fact turn a profit.

Even if JQ isn't profitable (which I think is unlikely, for the reasons you say), it very plainly serves an important strat fix role for the Qantas Group. It allows the Group to capture a large proportion of the leisure and VFR traffic at a lower cost, while focusing QF itself on targeting corporate and premium leisure traffic. Without JQ, either:
  • VA would be free to make larger profits from the segments that JQ covers, giving it a much stronger base to compete with QF as a hybrid carrier, or
  • QF would have had to heavily restructure itself to become a hybrid carrier, covering low cost and premium traffic.
​​​​​

Chris2303 30th Mar 2020 03:40


Originally Posted by SecretAngel (Post 10732785)
QF would have had to heavily restructure itself to become a hybrid carrier, covering low cost and premium traffic.​​​​​

It's going to have to go through a MAJOR restructure anyway

Window heat 31st Mar 2020 21:39

Qantas could cover the JQ model overnight, using QLink and the 737. The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors. The back 10 rows on every 737 become LCC with pay for everything service.

The Virgin story is the biggie though. I love the line that QF should get an incrementally large package if VA does. S Curran was on the TV a few weeks back saying VA were cashed up and would ride out the storm in a healthy state. I remember being stunned as that is at odds with what I’ve heard for a long time.

Slezy9 31st Mar 2020 21:41


Originally Posted by Window heat (Post 10735005)
The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.

Cheaper yes. How are Dash8's more comfortable than an A320?

layman 31st Mar 2020 21:56

For me, a Dash-8, even for Canberra-Sydney is starting to get a bit tedious. Longer sectors: no thanks - unless I can trade off comfort against a substantially reduced ticket price.

das Uber Soldat 31st Mar 2020 22:05


Originally Posted by Window
The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.

Hahaa. What?

ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE 31st Mar 2020 22:19


Originally Posted by Window heat (Post 10735005)
Qantas could cover the JQ model overnight, using QLink and the 737. The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.

What??

So you want to put Dash 8s on MEL-OOL sectors and further? And it’ll be cheaper and more comfortable?!

Have a look at the JQ network, I’d say at least half of our flying is over 2 hours. And a lot of the routes have 5-6 A321 flights a day (pre Coronavirus). How many dash 8s/ back 10 rows of a 737 are you planning on using

das Uber Soldat 31st Mar 2020 22:29


Originally Posted by Chad Gates (Post 10735047)
Off topic I know, but is JQ completely grounded? There have been no aircraft in the air all morming.

There is a small operation In April based out of Melbourne with a skeleton crew.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.