Sunfish, you’ve made a number of recent posts about QF that haven’t included the specific word ‘Sydneycentric’ (if indeed it is a word). Could you please revert to normal practice? It’s spoiling the drinking game we’ve got going here.
|
Originally Posted by Sunfish
(Post 10729512)
Open the skies. Cut Qantas loose. We paid a premium to these Sydney thieves for thirty years. Qantas COSTS more jobs than its worth.
|
Originally Posted by longjohn
(Post 10729525)
So are we propping up Optus as well if it starts to wobble?
How about Coles or Woolies? |
I do not subscribe to the evil monopoly theory.
Firstly, you are talking Qantas Domestic and Jetstar Domestic? Qantas International has competition, if anything VAI is barely worth mentioning in this regard. QantasLink has REX Network has Cobham, Skippers and Alliance. So regulate them, or force them to sell Jetstar. Efficient solutions that do not involve propping up inefficient foreign owned businesses with my tax $$ |
Originally Posted by longjohn
(Post 10730773)
So regulate them, or force them to sell Jetstar.
|
how does QF subsidise JQ domestically? We’ve all heard the rumours about international losing money/being propped up by QF but I don’t think many people doubt the Aussie domestic operation is highly profitable
|
S&P has effectively placed VAH on a CCC credit watch with uncertainty and there may be questions of group survival beyond June with the existing cash reserves.
In view of the deputy PM's comments this morning about not nationalising airlines, if the government wants a competitive airline sector, this may present somewhat of a challenge. |
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10731652)
how does QF subsidise JQ domestically? We’ve all heard the rumours about international losing money/being propped up by QF but I don’t think many people doubt the Aussie domestic operation is highly profitable
|
Originally Posted by Chris2303
(Post 10732471)
It's been discussed on here before about maintenance and fuel being charged to QF
with tiger essentially disappearing, JQ will be the sole LCC in the Aussie market. QF needs JQ to stop another operator setting up shop in Australia. We’ve already seen off TT and virgin blue so we must be doing something right. JQ ain’t going anywhere |
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10732574)
So because it’s been discussed on PPRUNE it has to true!!
|
Originally Posted by ddrwk
(Post 10732650)
and yet you posed the initial question to this forum? :ugh:
I guess what I was getting at was that there are some ideas that have been discussed so many times that guys convince themselves that they are facts. My counter point would be why would qantas prop up a loss making entity for all these years and continuously lie to the ASX in the process (which is of course, illegal)? Or is it maybe possible that Jetstar does in fact turn a profit. |
Originally Posted by ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE
(Post 10732665)
thats a fair point!
I guess what I was getting at was that there are some ideas that have been discussed so many times that guys convince themselves that they are facts. My counter point would be why would qantas prop up a loss making entity for all these years and continuously lie to the ASX in the process (which is of course, illegal)? Or is it maybe possible that Jetstar does in fact turn a profit.
|
Originally Posted by SecretAngel
(Post 10732785)
QF would have had to heavily restructure itself to become a hybrid carrier, covering low cost and premium traffic.
|
Qantas could cover the JQ model overnight, using QLink and the 737. The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors. The back 10 rows on every 737 become LCC with pay for everything service.
The Virgin story is the biggie though. I love the line that QF should get an incrementally large package if VA does. S Curran was on the TV a few weeks back saying VA were cashed up and would ride out the storm in a healthy state. I remember being stunned as that is at odds with what I’ve heard for a long time. |
Originally Posted by Window heat
(Post 10735005)
The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.
|
For me, a Dash-8, even for Canberra-Sydney is starting to get a bit tedious. Longer sectors: no thanks - unless I can trade off comfort against a substantially reduced ticket price.
|
Originally Posted by Window
The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.
|
Originally Posted by Window heat
(Post 10735005)
Qantas could cover the JQ model overnight, using QLink and the 737. The Dash8’s are more comfortable and cheaper to run than the A320 for domestic sectors.
So you want to put Dash 8s on MEL-OOL sectors and further? And it’ll be cheaper and more comfortable?! Have a look at the JQ network, I’d say at least half of our flying is over 2 hours. And a lot of the routes have 5-6 A321 flights a day (pre Coronavirus). How many dash 8s/ back 10 rows of a 737 are you planning on using |
Originally Posted by Chad Gates
(Post 10735047)
Off topic I know, but is JQ completely grounded? There have been no aircraft in the air all morming.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:06. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.