PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Tigerair Bali flights grounded (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/589409-tigerair-bali-flights-grounded.html)

porch monkey 20th Jan 2017 04:49

Christ there is some **** talked on this thread.:hmm:

Icarus2001 20th Jan 2017 08:04


Christ there is some **** talked on this thread.
Christ there is some **** talked on Pprune.

I fixed it for you.


PS Imagine if only actual professional pilots could comment on here. On second thoughts it would be just the same. I am amazed every day in the flight deck what people will believe.

Lookleft 20th Jan 2017 08:26


I am amazed every day in the flight deck what people will believe.
And the people who are sitting next to you are thinking exactly the same thing. :}

Icarus2001 20th Jan 2017 08:29


And the people who are sitting next to you are thinking exactly the same thing.
Unlikely, if I cannot see it with my own eyes I never believe it. There is a saying passed down from the previous generation...it's real when you can walk into the hangar and pee on the tyres...in regard to new types being introduced.

Now stop presuming to know what I say or think and get back to flight sim.

Lookleft 20th Jan 2017 08:38

Wow hubris and hypocrisy all in the one post and the cherry on top is a presumption of monumental proportions. Well done.

RAD_ALT_ALIVE 20th Jan 2017 10:44

B772,

I reckon a standard A320 could carry a 90% load on a 6 hour flight and still land with 3 to 4 tonne (just about enough for a tempo). Better yet in the Sharklet variety. Better again with the higher gross weight option. The need to carry tempo in winter would be diminished, but probably would be compensated for by a need for longer sector fuel due stronger headwinds, so nil practical difference.

Sure, it wouldn't be quite a full load, but it'd be pretty close.

With the optional auxilliary fuel tank (bringing the fuel capacity to almost exactly that of the B738) it would be a no-brainer.

And TT are not doing SYD or BNE to DPS. JQ already to ADL and PER in the A320, so those sectors are no issue.

GA Driver 21st Jan 2017 01:06

Not sure where you get those numbers from, but I'd say they're optimistic. Never seen any 'aux' tanks for a 320, but not sure it would help anyway due weight issues.

Couple of facts:

77t MTOW
18.7t (max fuel)
58.3t left over....
45t operating empty weight.
13.3t left over for whatever you want to fill it with.....
No idea what TT standard pax weight is but 82 seems to be the going rate with 14 kg bag per pax.
Me thinks around 139 seats on a 180 seat aircraft. 77% capacity

Fuel. 18.7 max
-1.3 fixed
-1.0 variable
16.4 left.
Burn 2.4t per/hour(absolute BEST case) = 6.8hrs range in nil wind
A bit 'toit' with any holding in Bali or wx north of AS!
So on paper it's doable, but not really set up for this run in seat numbers or fuel capacity.

Not sure the sharklets do 4/5th's of F$&k all for any fuel savings, but they do look keeeewl.

BPA 21st Jan 2017 02:34

The A320 ops to DPS are short term only (perhaps 1-2 months), until Tiger has approval for the B737. Tiger's first B737 to be added to their AOC has been undergoing crew training this week and once they have the B737 on the AOC another 2-3 will be transferred rather quickly from Virgin to Tiger.

So although the A320 is not the ideal option and may require capping the pax or a tech stop in Darwin, it gets them back in the market. The bogans that fly to DPS will forget the last few weeks once Tiger offers a sale to DPS when the A320 starts.

GA Driver 21st Jan 2017 02:56

So the burning question, was there ever any intention to put the 737 on the tiger aoc or has this just forced their hand?

chookcooker 21st Jan 2017 03:10


Originally Posted by GA Driver (Post 9648242)
So the burning question, was there ever any intention to put the 737 on the tiger aoc or has this just forced their hand?

Maybe the whole ASX announcement 6 months ago saying they were replacing all a320s with 737s was a bit of a hint?

GA Driver 21st Jan 2017 04:16

I worded that poorly. I meant was there any intention to put the existing 737's on the Tiger aoc until the replacement started? The announcement was 6 months ago, haven't seen a replacement a/c yet, hence the original question had this just forced their hand?

PoppaJo 21st Jan 2017 04:35

Simple reason behind the lack of replacements is because they are behind schedule.

It was meant to happen 2 months ago but got delayed further. Domestic 737 was due to start late November.

Tiger will have a net increase in aircraft once all A320s have been replaced, +3 Bali Machines.

Looks like they are fighting to get 737 Domestic up and going before the A320s go to Bali otherwise it's going to screw the Domestic schedule.

B772 23rd Jan 2017 08:49

My reading of the situation is not looking rosy for Tiger. I believe the costs will have a serious impact on the Virgin financial position. Expect an ASX announcement soon.

The Bullwinkle 23rd Jan 2017 09:31


Expect an ASX announcement soon.
Hopefully announcing a new CEO.

Snakecharma 23rd Jan 2017 10:55

I heard a story that this may well be the case Bullwinkle! The current one has been missing in action for a little while.

downdata 24th Jan 2017 05:52


Hopefully announcing a new CEO.
... for VA

The Bullwinkle 24th Jan 2017 06:12


.... for VA
That's what I meant! :ok:

Ken Borough 24th Jan 2017 09:20


Hopefully announcing a new CEO
.....James Hogan? :} .

BPA 24th Jan 2017 09:35

From Australian Aviation

Etihad?s James Hogan to depart in second half of 2017 | Australian Aviation

The Bullwinkle 24th Jan 2017 09:50

Maybe they'll both go to Woolworths...........As trolley boys!


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:05.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.