Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

REX AIRLINES Trading Halt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st August 2024 | 13:09
  #301 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,419
Likes: 853
From: Brisvegas
All air routes are competitive at one level or another
​​​​​​​What about the protected routes in WA?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 13:10
  #302 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 532
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
What about the protected routes in WA?
You have to tender for it. That’s the competition part.
neville_nobody is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 13:23
  #303 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 728
Likes: 28
From: Perth WA
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
You have to tender for it. That’s the competition part.
Been like that for years in Scotland for the Highlands and Islands, non profit making routes.

Additionally tenders are invited for maintaining ground services at the airports as well as the air services.

Seems to work well.
nivsy is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 13:33
  #304 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 728
Likes: 28
From: Perth WA
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
Sure, it is possible that a white night Middle East carrier decides to swoop in and save the company to get a foothold in the Australian market.
Why though?
We have 26 million people on a huge island, the big two carriers have the market sewn up nicely and make money in fits and starts. Why would you want to buy in to that?
Why do many industries buy into others ...similar or otherwise?

Perhaps, say Qatar, would view this as an opportunity. Win brownie points....while achieving a possible desired hold of VA (assuming Rex Regional would be allowed to come under the VA banner). Perhaps they just would like to ruffle the feathers of QF and even their own regional operations never mind further afield. Additionally it could be seen as a solution to the government's problem of maintaining the needed regional services. If there is a will....often...there is a way

Perhaps not impossible.

Last edited by nivsy; 1st August 2024 at 13:34. Reason: Sp
nivsy is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 14:27
  #305 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 132
Likes: 49
From: Artic
Looks like Rex owe Sydney airport a lot of money, two of the 737 barricaded with concrete blocks, the 4 in Melbourne are not.
chickoroll is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 14:37
  #306 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 183
Likes: 82
From: Anvya
From memory Melbourne have a history of not blocking aircraft . Maybe they want to be seen to be a good place to do business by startups ?
KAPAC is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 17:08
  #307 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 148
Likes: 135
From: Sydney
I have seen one Rex 737 blocked in Melbourne using a couple of fuel trucks.
MalcolmReynolds is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 20:35
  #308 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 198
Likes: 206
From: Mosman
Originally Posted by nivsy
Why do many industries buy into others ...similar or otherwise?

Perhaps, say Qatar, would view this as an opportunity. Win brownie points....while achieving a possible desired hold of VA (assuming Rex Regional would be allowed to come under the VA banner). Perhaps they just would like to ruffle the feathers of QF and even their own regional operations never mind further afield. Additionally it could be seen as a solution to the government's problem of maintaining the needed regional services. If there is a will....often...there is a way

Perhaps not impossible.
why allow a private company to be attacked by a government owned and subsidised one?!
government needs to level the playing field if this is the approach. QANTAS can no longer compete internationally
grangebackstabber is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 21:13
  #309 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 375
Likes: 65
From: Brisbane
Originally Posted by MalcolmReynolds
I have seen one Rex 737 blocked in Melbourne using a couple of fuel trucks.
Don’t think that’s the work of the airport
markis10 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 21:30
  #310 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 135
From: NSW
Originally Posted by grangebackstabber
why allow a private company to be attacked by a government owned and subsidised one?!
government needs to level the playing field if this is the approach. QANTAS can no longer compete internationally

Rex entered an established arena and attacked QF and VA and lost…
TBM-Legend is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 22:14
  #311 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 290
From: Australia
Has the Australian aviation guru GT, stepped out from the Qantas Chairman’s Lounge to make a comment on Rex yet?





Stationair8 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 23:03
  #312 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 383
From: Australia
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
You have to tender for it. That’s the competition part.
And even then, some of the operators cannot make a dime in profit even with millions of WA government subsidies.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 23:07
  #313 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 569
Likes: 383
From: Australia
Originally Posted by ozbiggles
‘Surely CEO can’t be paid out, can someone confirm? How could he in good conscience take that money while others get nothing.’

Question has already been answered. Yes he can and the fact the company did answers the second part of you question. I get the feeling however First Officer Karma is knocking on a few doors now and we haven’t heard the last of how the executives behaved and who may have given them direction as Rome burned.
Interesting. ASIC can apparently, if someone is issuing directives to the Board or from the Board, deem the former at least, to be effectively a Board Member/Director, placing them within the ambit of having their personal assets seizable in any liquidation/bankruptcy. I know this because it was raised as a power of ASIC during my time as an employee at a company that went bust.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 23:08
  #314 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 615
Likes: 182
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by Stationair8
Has the Australian aviation guru GT, stepped out from the Qantas Chairman’s Lounge to make a comment on Rex yet?
I think he is waiting for VH to give him his script.
1A_Please is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 23:11
  #315 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1,169
From: Kichin
This article says it all really, especially the last few paragraphs.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/F5M...ibextid=WC7FNe

gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 23:45
  #316 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 44
From: australia
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
The issue is that private equity now has to compete with a government financed airline which is basically impossible.
Don't private health insurance companies compete against Medicare every day? Also railway networks in Europe where you have private operators competing against state owned companies.
antheads is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2024 | 23:59
  #317 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 446
Likes: 78
From: australia
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
Difference there is ATC is a monopoly. All air routes are competitive at one level or another. The issue is that private equity now has to compete with a government financed airline which is basically impossible.
I don't think its impossible. If anything, private enterprise will generally offer more competitive pricing as they are more efficient at doing things and the government enterprise will continue on the 'loss making' routes as they are obligated to serve such routes.

Example: when Optus first brought telecommunications competition to Australia and had to compete with government owned Telstra (then called Telecom Australia). Optus offered cheaper pricing in the cities etc, but Telecom had to still provide services in areas where Optus couldn't make a go of it.
mikewil is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2024 | 00:22
  #318 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1,169
From: Kichin
Originally Posted by mikewil
I don't think its impossible. If anything, private enterprise will generally offer more competitive pricing as they are more efficient at doing things and the government enterprise will continue on the 'loss making' routes as they are obligated to serve such routes.

Example: when Optus first brought telecommunications competition to Australia and had to compete with government owned Telstra (then called Telecom Australia). Optus offered cheaper pricing in the cities etc, but Telecom had to still provide services in areas where Optus couldn't make a go of it.
The problem lies in the absolute lack of ethics in the C suite when it comes to promising things they can’t sustainably afford to deliver, and the overuse of ‘efficiency’ to justify short term personal incentives. Ego and political schmoosery are all most Australian corporations are capable of.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd August 2024 | 00:56
  #319 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2016
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 695
From: Sunshine Coast
Originally Posted by transition_alt
Rex is quickly sounding more corrupt than QF with Joyce at the helm.
An outfit run by a Singaporean autocrat, aided and abetted by a former politician (a "travel rorts" casualty, no less), with a corporate governance structure that ignored key ASX corporate governance principles, corrupt? Ya think?

And the appointment of EY as administrators is starting to stink. If they were engaged and providing advice as far back as May (something that, in of itself, should have triggered a S.674 continuous disclosure obligation), and had anything to do with the CEO's platinum parachute, their appointment as administrator is untenable. You can only wonder whether Michael Kaine might look at pulling a Combet and have EY replaced.
Old 2nd August 2024 | 00:56
  #320 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 746
From: sydney
The word ethics has been removed from the C suite dictionary.
dragon man is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.