LATAM upset SYD-AKL Mon 11 Mar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ardmore, New Zealand
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few articles are attributing the injuries to a “technical issue causing a strong movement” rather than turbulence. Will be interesting to see as some facts are released.
Thread Starter
Jokat said there was no turbulence after the incident and once the plane landed the pilot came to the back of the plane in “shock”.
“I asked ‘what happened?’ and he said ‘my gauges just blanked out, I lost all of my ability to fly the plane’.”
“I asked ‘what happened?’ and he said ‘my gauges just blanked out, I lost all of my ability to fly the plane’.”
Not sure of any truth, but rumor going around in a South American pilot group, is that the entire aircraft electrical system (including primary instruments, flight computers, lights, pax IFE, etc) went out for about 45 seconds and when systems came back online, there was a 'large, rapid, uncommanded' movement of the vertical stab.
Faulty RPDU?
The FAA had a AD out around a decade ago from memory around generator failures. Be interested to see if the RAT was deployed
Might be another one for the FAA to look at. They might need to hire some more staff soon due to workload.
The FAA had a AD out around a decade ago from memory around generator failures. Be interested to see if the RAT was deployed
Might be another one for the FAA to look at. They might need to hire some more staff soon due to workload.
That really stands out when you look at the A350 program. Sure, Airbus didn’t get everything right, few issues about, but they did a damn good job and I’ve not seen such a flawless entry into service for a new type. It’s a brilliant machine also, crew and passenger favourite.
777X is the next problem child on the horizon. I don’t even need to check the crystal ball to tell me that is going to become a problem also.
777X is the next problem child on the horizon. I don’t even need to check the crystal ball to tell me that is going to become a problem also.
…there was a 'large, rapid, uncommanded' movement of the vertical stab.
The following 6 users liked this post by Roo:
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: auckland
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the uncommanded rudder inputs are right, the tongue in cheek comment would be if it was an Airbus the the tail would have fallen off!
The following 8 users liked this post by Big Silver Spoon:
The following 2 users liked this post by TWT:
I'm very much aware of that DirectAnywhere . The comment stated that it was just another crap Boeing product.
I merely pointed out that Airbus products are not immune to problems.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
I merely pointed out that Airbus products are not immune to problems.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Last edited by TWT; 11th Mar 2024 at 10:41.
The following 3 users liked this post by TWT:
So, no battery powered standby AHRS? Yikes! That’s what you’d call a catastrophe. But, but, but wait… everything resolved itself after a few seconds. Phew.. crisis averted, well other than the 50 pax jammed onto the ceiling enjoying their few seconds of zero G astronaut time.
All I’m saying is there’s more than meets the eye here.. not blaming hardware, not blaming crew.. let’s see what the FDR and CVR say.
All I’m saying is there’s more than meets the eye here.. not blaming hardware, not blaming crew.. let’s see what the FDR and CVR say.
The following 11 users liked this post by ZFT:
Not sure of any truth, but rumor going around in a South American pilot group, is that the entire aircraft electrical system (including primary instruments, flight computers, lights, pax IFE, etc) went out for about 45 seconds and when systems came back online, there was a 'large, rapid, uncommanded' movement of the vertical stab.
The following 6 users liked this post by Mozella:
77X is the next problem child on the horizon.