Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

NJS and the A220

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jul 2023, 10:29
  #81 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 579
Received 314 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
Airlink (NJS) was formed as a subsidiary of Australian (TAA) in 1989. QF took over Australian and absorbed it into mainline so in reality NJS was to Australian then what they are to QF now.
Interesting. So basically NJS has been around for as long as Domestic Mainline however were predominately operating regional routes and had bases in ‘regional’ areas (DRW, CNS, TSV, HBA ect). Australian and now QF Mainline don’t have an aircraft of an appropriate size to operate on routes like MEL-CFS or DRW-ASP. Their pay reflects that they operated a smaller aircraft than Mainline.

What has changed recently (since Qantas management purchased the business) is that Qantas management has closed all their regional bases and is trying to operate them on more domestic mainline routes. From overheard convos on the crew bus NJS Pilots have no interest in stealing routes and their life has got considerably more miserable since Qantas took them over.

Last edited by aussieflyboy; 19th Jul 2023 at 11:33.
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 19th Jul 2023, 11:19
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,059
Received 730 Likes on 197 Posts
Originally Posted by soseg
Were NJS pilots stood down much, if at all, during covid?

I distinctly remember receiving photos in an email from the QF Friday weekly news thing they send us all, of NJS management cutting cakes mid pandemic while I was stood down unpaid. Why were they cutting cakes? Because they were being awarded new routes on the 717 which were previously 737 routes.

Who else would have taken the a220s off them? It wouldn't have been mainline back then as they're clearly too expensive.
Very unlikely it would be NAA as they're over on the west coast and an unorganised mess struggling with their own ops.

What specifically was the threat they faced?

Yeah, they did the same thing.
At the risk of feeding the trolls, I’ll correct some of the deliberate misinformation here.

NAA, as you say is in WA but an AOC is little more than a piece of paper. The location is almost irrelevant to Qantas management or NJS. The threat was that the A220 would be placed under the NAA AOC and every NJS pilot would wither on the vine with the 717. If pilots wanted to continue their employment, they would have to apply to work on the A220. The A220 was going NAA, and the East coast bases would continue on the NAA EBA.

If/when you grow some balls, you should direct your agro towards the CEO as he/she/it is responsible for fracturing the pilot group purely for IR reasons.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by gordonfvckingramsay:
Old 19th Jul 2023, 11:25
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 398
Received 110 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by aussieflyboy
From overheard convos on the crew bus NJS Pilots have no interest in stealing routes and their life has got considerably more miserably since Qantas took them over.
You might say NJS were actually the biggest losers out of covid as they ended up in the Qantas group

In all seriousness no group entity or contractor owns any routes. Some might have traditionally operated them for a long time, but times and aircraft utilization changes... thats going to become very apparent as the 220s come online and the smallest mainline aircraft potentially ends up a 200+ seat 321.
Lapon is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2023, 11:36
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Yes, and we should remember that NJS/Cobham was operating intra-WA well before "Qantas" came along.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2023, 13:39
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 312
Received 351 Likes on 109 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
At the risk of feeding the trolls, I’ll correct some of the deliberate misinformation here.

NAA, as you say is in WA but an AOC is little more than a piece of paper. The location is almost irrelevant to Qantas management or NJS. The threat was that the A220 would be placed under the NAA AOC and every NJS pilot would wither on the vine with the 717. If pilots wanted to continue their employment, they would have to apply to work on the A220. The A220 was going NAA, and the East coast bases would continue on the NAA EBA.

If/when you grow some balls, you should direct your agro towards the CEO as he/she/it is responsible for fracturing the pilot group purely for IR reasons.
Yes I am aware NAA management were approached behind the scenes about the a220 if NJS were to vote no. Still, good luck. Disorganised, and big whoop going from the 2nd lowest paid to the lowest paid.

Don't worry. My gripe is with management. And the scabs who save the day for $360/day RDO call outs.

What has changed recently (since Qantas management purchased the business) is that Qantas management has closed all their regional bases and is trying to operate them on more domestic mainline routes. From overheard convos on the crew bus NJS Pilots have no interest in stealing routes and their life has got considerably more miserable since Qantas took them over.
Spot on.
soseg is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2023, 06:04
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: The penthouse
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 10 Posts
If/when you grow some balls, you should direct your agro towards the CEO as he/she/it is responsible for fracturing the pilot group purely for IR reasons.
Surely it is the mainline pilots that are responsible. They have consistently given QF management their blessing to create new entities and alter egos for the next pilot generations. Even B scales for their own new hires. And all for what? 3% and a biscuit. Gradually realising their own stupidity and inattention to detail in the eba, and now crying over thousands of lost career opportunities of their own making. Selfishness understandable, but some of the hypocrisy here is untenable.
No upgrade is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2023, 06:12
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: MOM n DADs
Posts: 25
Received 10 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by VH-FTS
All you grumpy old fools pointing fingers at each other, when the real threat to anyone employed within the Qantas group is all the outsourcing to Alliance and their e190s.
What might you think will happen to the Alliance deal once NJS get all their A220s?
SITTINGBULL is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2023, 07:37
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Sunny Coast
Posts: 399
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SITTINGBULL
What might you think will happen to the Alliance deal once NJS get all their A220s?
QQ will get even more work....
Deano969 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2023, 04:56
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SITTINGBULL
What might you think will happen to the Alliance deal once NJS get all their A220s?
They take more flying from the other group airlines. QF have signed a lengthy contract with Alliance to use many airframes. Not going to be a lot of work left for the 737s once the 220s and 190s are fully up to speed.
VH-FTS is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2023, 09:25
  #90 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 579
Received 314 Likes on 110 Posts
It’s been said before:

E Jets = Old Cobham NJS work
A220 = B737 work
A321 = A330 work

It’ll be their 10 year plan.

No more engineers needed to dispatch domestic aircraft. Cheaper Pilot wages with less complex EAs. Upper management all walk away with millions.
aussieflyboy is online now  
Old 21st Jul 2023, 10:21
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: centre of my universe
Posts: 309
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
That 10year plan is slowly unraveling.
Poto is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st Jul 2023, 10:45
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Except none of the replacement aircraft suggested can do the job of the aircraft they would replace. Clapped out E190s only carry about 94 pax and have no wifi or entertainment. A220 problems just starting to emerge especially in regards to power plant, only carry about 150. A321 versus A330 not even worth discussing. As mentioned, JG pushed his agenda and seemingly won the day, but now it will all start to unravel.
The_Equaliser is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st Jul 2023, 11:51
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: The penthouse
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 10 Posts
A321 versus A330 not even worth discussing
Expect the 321XLR will operate on time, have functional IFE and WIFI, and not disappoint more often than not.
​​​​​​​
No upgrade is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2023, 11:56
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 98
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
What people seem to not get their heads around is that slots aren’t increasing at airports. Every port is getting busier, but more slots aren’t magically appearing. Airports still aren’t building 20 year overdue runways. So aircraft need to be bigger.

Whilst I don’t doubt that some mainline work will go to NJS, these A321’s are needed for the triangle, plus other busy routes and also new emerging medium haul international markets. Why would QF commit to more than 20 when they don’t have a crystal ball to see 7 years down the track when we all go down the aviation rollercoaster again? Many 737’s have a lot of life left in them and the fleet replacement will take time with a dual fleet for a period. Whilst I don’t think we’ll see 75 x A321’s I think 50-60 would be in the ball park with the remainder being in the A330 replacement aircraft.
The replacement is being announced at the full year results and if you old guys think a smaller aircraft can replace the current capacity with the debacle of Australian airports and their slot system, you have to be kidding yourself.

As for the E190/A220, yes there will be work for them as a significant amount of new routes have been started throughout covid. This will naturally take some passengers from the main routes and more evenly distribute pax around the network.
transition_alt is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by transition_alt:
Old 21st Jul 2023, 15:10
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 398
Received 110 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by transition_alt
if you old guys think a smaller aircraft can replace the current capacity with the debacle of Australian airports and their slot system, you have to be kidding yourself.
Before 787s there were 747s, they served many ports, were mighty big and iconic, even bigger than the 787s.
It didn't matter in the face of yield management and contempt for the public. Alas, here we are.

A smaller aircraft can always replace a bigger one.
Lapon is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 21st Jul 2023, 15:30
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Age: 58
Posts: 275
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by The_Equaliser
Clapped out E190s only carry about 94 pax and have no wifi or entertainment. .
You seem to be 2 years behind reality
markis10 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 26th Jul 2023, 10:20
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Cill
Posts: 149
Received 113 Likes on 37 Posts
MEL - CBR initial route with Jooooohn G still sprucing SE Asia. Lookin good John. Got anyone to fly it yet?
ShandywithSugar is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by ShandywithSugar:
Old 26th Jul 2023, 16:41
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by markis10
You seem to be 2 years behind reality
I was a passenger in one last week, I would say that was a very appropriate description.

Certainly NO wifi or entertainment.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2023, 01:23
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pprune is ******
Posts: 165
Received 178 Likes on 74 Posts
Get more small planes, where ya gonna park them? Melbourne converting prime position gates in to 'retail precincts' cos the moneys in overpriced coffee establisments yeah?
dejapoo is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2023, 05:36
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Age: 58
Posts: 275
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by RENURPP
I was a passenger in one last week, I would say that was a very appropriate description.

Certainly NO wifi or entertainment.
Q streaming is being installed over the fleet for the last two years, given they have recent arrivals there will be exceptions to the rule
markis10 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.