Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Letís fix Notams

Old 9th Feb 2023, 08:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: BOOGI
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by compressor stall
What with a nice two tiered effect with a little path down the middle?
One that looks nice Ö and not too expensive

Or maybe you could cut it down with Ö a HERRING!
RussianBot is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2023, 09:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,169
Received 38 Likes on 19 Posts
One long international flight I did across many FIRs, the FIR NOTAMs only were 133 pages in normal font. And there was some important stuff buried on page 80 that would have caused significant angst if I hadn't found it. I was glad I'd spent the 2 hours the day before poolside checking them.

NOTAM requirements are here https://www.airservicesaustralia.com...s-for-CASA.pdf
compressor stall is online now  
Old 9th Feb 2023, 14:37
  #23 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,142
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best way to fix notams would be a fee of US$1 every time each notam is read by a pilot.

sometimes 156 pages for a flight.
swh is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2023, 15:20
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 455
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
I find it odd that there is no mention of software to do the conversion of the majority of NOTAMs that are conventional so they can be sorted and rated automatically leaving the smaller irregular presentation NOTAMs to be interpreted. The workload should be considerably eased by that. If there was a service, then the user interpretations might be collected and, if they are consistently interpreted by the users, added and substituted into the automatic category. Pay users a couple of dollars if they submit before it goes automatic.

If a code always stands for some statement, it's not difficult to do a find/replace. Similar with reformatting times and dates.

I like the compensation angle unless the pilots can influence the issuing of NOTAMs as a money maker. Look what happens to software developers when a reward is handed out for finding bugs in the code. If it takes 20 seconds to read one, that's 3 per minute, or 180 per hour. At a dollar a piece that's pretty good compensation.
MechEngr is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2023, 17:30
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 125
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
If the NOTAM admin system would allow the person entering the NOTAM to rank or rate it, that would solve some of the problem. One could enter a NOTAM into the system and rank it between 1 being super-critical(runway xx fouled, closed to all traffic UFN) down to 10(4ft shrub 135M from threshold). It would give pilots an instant way to filter the info based on the person entering the data from the start.

Of course, it's up to the person entering the data not to fudge it and consider every NOTAM they enter as a 1. With that case, then using a designated NOTAM reviewer from the airline(s), and possibly from a group of mil and corp pilots could then squawk any NOTAM that was mis-ranked as a 1 for the proverbial shrub and have it moved to a ranking of 10.

Also, for a temp NOTAM, do not allow them to be re-issued repeatedly for the same squawk condition. Require that it must go over the wall to a perm NOTAM and meet the requirements for a Perm NOTAM. That would remove at least 10% maybe more of the chaff.
ethicalconundrum is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2023, 08:42
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Maybe that shrub needs PPRUNing?
RampDog is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by RampDog:
Old 12th Feb 2023, 09:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 138
Received 99 Likes on 20 Posts
I think it's litigation avoidance. I worked for one employer which provided notams for the entire Pacific region for a Hong Kong, Bangkok sector and another employer whose system only gave relevant notams for the leg and diversions. Much better and likely to be read.
bugged on the right is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2023, 13:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 48
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There’s no way to fix the NOTAM issue actually, if it was in plain English they would be 2-3 times longer anyway. I’m able to scroll 100 notams in about a minute as a shorthaul pilot, but that relies on multiple sectors per day and you pick up a new one easily, or not 😂
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2023, 13:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
One must remember that the NOTAM system is world wide and is part of ICAO. In my time with them it took an average of seven yrs to process any change in their system due to language differences and very slow mail in some parts of the globe etc.

Notwithstanding there is a very urgent need for an update. Airservices could improve the system greatly and still be ICAO compliant. EG: Why does a GA flight operating OCTA (in G) need all the NOTAMs for the nearby Primary airport? It works the other way as well, the 737 does not need info on en-route GA dromes etcÖ.

AIRSERVICEs have been tackled on this a number of times over the past decade to make the PFIBs smaller and more relevant, but they donít see a need and use standardisation with ICAO as an excuse. CASA need to apply the screws for some change. Not sure if anyone there knows what to do however!!

The other side of the coin is that much of GA do not even bother getting or reading them. That is also part of the problem.
cogwheel is offline  
The following users liked this post:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.