Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qantas A380 VH-OQF/VH-OQE to be scrapped

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qantas A380 VH-OQF/VH-OQE to be scrapped

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2022, 08:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas A380 VH-OQF/VH-OQE to be scrapped

According to a source VH-OQF commenced parting out at Victorville today with VH-OQE planned for next month.
vhtae is offline  
Old 17th May 2022, 08:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,290
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Nice source of parts for the remaining fleet. However Qantas will no doubt sell the parts and managers will get a bonus.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 17th May 2022, 22:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
So Lawrence Hargrave and Smithy draw the short straw.
Fris B. Fairing is offline  
Old 18th May 2022, 00:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,469
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
I would have thought OQA would have been scrapped, or did that year long repair save the hours and cycles so much that it’s actually “younger” than the others?
morno is offline  
Old 18th May 2022, 01:21
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by morno
I would have thought OQA would have been scrapped, or did that year long repair save the hours and cycles so much that it’s actually “younger” than the others?
It seems that’s the case with OQA. OQE and OQF were apparently the only two that didn’t have a landing gear replacement after 12 years. So clearly a cost issue.
vhtae is offline  
Old 18th May 2022, 11:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,125
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Wasn't OQA one of the heavy airframes that Airbus built? If so a good candidate for scrapping coz of the lower payload and higher specific fuel consumption.
mustafagander is offline  
Old 18th May 2022, 20:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,393
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by mustafagander
Wasn't OQA one of the heavy airframes that Airbus built? If so a good candidate for scrapping coz of the lower payload and higher specific fuel consumption.
You can't scrap Nancy!
Fris B. Fairing is offline  
Old 18th May 2022, 20:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
How many flight hours and cycles do they have accumulated? These must still be pretty young aircraft? So they break up early unmodified ones and keep the later builds flying?
Less Hair is online now  
Old 10th Jun 2022, 04:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: gold coast
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
How many flight hours and cycles do they have accumulated? These must still be pretty young aircraft? So they break up early unmodified ones and keep the later builds flying?
What a pity to lose the A380's from a pax standpoint anyway. Just got back from a QF flight, operated by Emirates operating an A380 Brisbane-Dubai which was full both ways in J class. They just seem so much roomier than the 777's on to Europe. Emirates have a great product overall by the way. Glad QF is using them rather than doing it themselves. Brisbane airport also good with more Border Force at the terminals than Sydney had a few months ago. Minimum wait.

Heard that one of the reasons behind the downfall of the 380 ( I know there are a few) is that Boeing lobbied American airports to not upgrade to accept it. However Google says that there are 16 USA airports that can handle the A380 so not sure of that. Def best aircraft for pax in my opinion.
extralite is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2022, 11:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
Yes it is the best from a pax point of view, by far. The opposite is true from an operator’s perspective however. That aircraft with less than half life used are being scrapped should tell you just how popular it is with operators.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2022, 07:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VH-OQF two days ago…



vhtae is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2022, 12:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Cold, wet and windy
Posts: 100
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Surely OQA will suffer a similar early retirement like OJH did after its accident?
Mach1Muppet is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2022, 13:20
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach1Muppet
Surely OQA will suffer a similar early retirement like OJH did after its accident?
VH-OQA is currently being prepared for return over the next few weeks. OQF and OQE are the only two getting scrapped for parts.
vhtae is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2022, 01:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Canberra
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach1Muppet
Surely OQA will suffer a similar early retirement like OJH did after its accident?
Why? Lets not forget the historical significance of OQA, when retirement finally comes, it would be a worthy aircraft for long-term display. Additionally, evidence presented on other sites would suggest that the cost of operating a heavy OQA outways the cost of upgrading OQF and OQE.
HK144 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2022, 07:50
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Cold, wet and windy
Posts: 100
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by HK144
Why? Lets not forget the historical significance of OQA, when retirement finally comes, it would be a worthy aircraft for long-term display. Additionally, evidence presented on other sites would suggest that the cost of operating a heavy OQA outways the cost of upgrading OQF and OQE.
Nah definitely a good call, my guess was history would repeat itself like it did when OJH was repaired after the overrun, but more including;
>Its a first wave aircraft and weighs 1000kg more
>The first few aircraft to be released after the modifications weighed 3 ton more than those who haven't (more bums in seats)

I guess you're right in OQA's significance, the big question now, where would it be displayed!

Edit: Yeah forgot about OQF had a jacking incident and now carries a penalty, didn't think of that!

Last edited by Mach1Muppet; 12th Jun 2022 at 08:03.
Mach1Muppet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.