Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Another Bank Runner Bites the Dust

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Another Bank Runner Bites the Dust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2002, 23:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: yssy
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Another Bank Runner Bites the Dust

That rule, usually called the inevitable, has apparently struck again. Seemingly Maitland/Bankstown based bankrunner had receivership appointed yesterday at 1100.
Feel sorry for the guys and gals working for them, some of whom are owed holiday pay, etc., not to mention the surrounding businesses owed dough.
It makes a mockery of CASA's stated intent to apply a financial performance test to all operators.
Any more news from anyone???
kimwest is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 01:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The dark corner of the bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that Cirrus aviation that has gone under?

Hung over sincerely, Dougy
Douglas Mcdonnell is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 01:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must have got a tad tired of sleeping with one eye open!

Goes around Comes Around.....

No doubt start up as something else...
JULIET WHISKEY is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 01:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The dark corner of the bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jeeezzz Juliet Whiskey tell us how you really feel!!
Douglas Mcdonnell is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 04:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Is it really surprising when the last rates I saw bank runners in general must be operating below cost, not paying pilots, fudging on maintenance and being further penalised for late arrivals?

This comment is a general comment about what freight companies pay. It is not intended to reflect on whatever company has gone tits up, of which I have no knowledge.

Regardless, I'm sure another operator or two will rush into the fray to accept remuneration below their operating cost.
Torres is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 04:36
  #6 (permalink)  

Don Quixote Impersonator
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torres

'twas ever thus.

as usual the the score is Bank 1 Aviation 0.

Commbank just released a $2.6 billion profit, they wouldn't even be able to find the line in their accounts for the bankrunners with a 10X magnifying glass.

But you cant blame em really, it's the Dilberts in the industry who fight so very fiercely amongst themselves for the opportunity to go broke.

They are just asking for the shafting, but wait, in a minute you'll hear the same old Greek chorus start up in a minute, about CASA , ASA enroute charges and Airport fees being responsible for their demise,

It's much easier to do that than sell your service for the right price and if the right price is not competitive with other means then you dont have a business, just a very expensive indulgence.

I wonder which set of creditors copped it this time, IMHO aviation creditors who still advance credit to aviation companies operating these services, deserve a special place in the loony bin.

kimwest asks a relevant question re CASA, problem is they don't have anyone on board who would really know where to look.

Must be something in the water.
gaunty is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 05:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Gaunty. I didn't even bother to "rise to the bait" about CASA's "assessment" of an operator's financial status. Having seen their requirements and watch CASA "financially approve" insolvent operators I didn't consider it worthy of comment.

It's one of the few tasks they manage to do even worse than regulatory re-write.

Bank running is: old, tired aircraft; cross hired aircraft; un paid or under paid pilots; paying for endorsements; paying for "ICUS"; overloading; fudging M/R's; fudged log books; late arrival penalties etc etc ad infinitum.

And it's not the Banks that necessarily do the screwing. Whilst I don't doubt the bids are competative, it's the express freight companies, totally devoid of any morals, who are passing out "contracts" to eager aviation operators all keen on eventually going bust!

I think that pretty well summarises that scene!
Torres is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 10:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Quick to lay blame before getting all the facts

OK dudes,

I have been reading these forums over the last 12 months taking in all replies to topics posted and quite often wonder what motivate you guys to always have the right answer to anything that is discussed.

In relation to this unfortunate demise of a local operator, you blokes are far from the real reason why it's happenned.

- Dodgy maintenance, pilots fudging the paperwork, high charges, failure of CASA in their obligations, airport fees, unpaid - underpaid pilots ,overloading etc.... - were reasons cited by those who care to comment.

It seems not many people know exactly what the operation totally entails. "Bankrunning" these days really don't carry too much bank stuff at all. Try heaps of overnight satchels, pathology samples, mail, parcels, film processing stuff, etc etc. Citing bank profits?? nothing to do with it. ---- what line of thinking???? I don't follow

Well, you all guessed WRONG! it's NONE of these at all!!!
You should gather ALL of the facts before crucifying the wrong people.



When one of your employees goes in and takes over $180,000 out of the till..... Guess what happens??????

none of the above " educated guesses!!"
Allnighter is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 10:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can anyone confirm this information is infact correct and that it was infact the above mentioned airline?

Thanks
stormywx is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2002, 13:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Canberra
Age: 57
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Storymywx... Yes its true and yes the aforementioned airline.

Secondly.

Allnighter...
Only believe half of what you see and NONE of what your told.

Timetofly is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 00:18
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Ahhh sweet justice

Couldn't happen to a nicer bloke.

There are plenty of us out here who have been ripped off by the man in question. Never mind the CASA financial checks... how on earth did he ever pass a 1st Class medical???

I have every sympathy for his former employees who, in my discussions with them, faithfully and blindly repeated the lies told by the boss about the viability etc of the company.

Allnighter: Theft by an employee? Who did you hear that from? If it was the fat man then have a good think about everything he has ever told you.

He aparrently owns a "sleeper" company and AOC. Can't wait to see which company rises from the ashes next week
Elk McPherson is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 02:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Established.
Age: 53
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess we can expect to hear of the charges being laid against the 'thief'.

That Hunter Valley run in particular has been under cut by shonk after shonk and certainly could not be close to profitable in a pressurised Navajo of all things.

Everyone seems to want to run an aviation business (an oxymoron I know), except those who know anything about it.

I must say it is a poor choice of title for the post however, as I was waiting to read Vale _________, don't do that to me.
The Messiah is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 04:18
  #13 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A question

Do banks have a duty of care, or any responsibility, not to 'impose' unrealistic schedules, or 'must-get-there-itis'?

Gaunty?
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 05:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Claret. It is my understanding Banks are not directly involved nor are they parties to contracts with any operators.

The operations started many years ago carrying time sensitive documents on befalf of various banks, hence the title "Bank Runners".

Now the operations are conducted by the express freight companies and loads consist of express freight, consolidated freight, newspapers, medical samples and bank documents.

The banks pay a significant sum to the express freight companies, who then load the aircraft with their own express freight. I would not care to hazard a guess on how profitable it is for the freight companies, but as they have been at it for many years, I suspect quite profitable.

It is those freight companies that are screwing the stupid operators. One of the biggest - and most immoral - also previously owned a significant share in a now defunct major Australian airline.
Torres is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 06:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aussie
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an engineer when you have to refuse to sign an aircraft out because you havn't been paid in 3 months, you have to conclude that the aircraft owner doesn't have much money.

Fortunately we got our money a week before the **** hit the fan.

The problem is the industry has too many enthusiasts:

Pilots who will fly for nothing, because they just want to fly.

Owners who are in it for the "glamour" of owning an aircraft. But can't afford the maintenance.

Get these together and you have poor business and badly looked after aircraft
otaio is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 06:43
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,422
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
otaio. I think it was Gaunty that once summed them up very well. I think is comment was "Wandering adventurers of no fixed percentage".

Your actions were interesting and as absurd as it may sound, legally questionable. I'm not sure CASA would support you not signing out a serviceable aircraft. As best as I could establish (from similar past experience) you can only resort to a "Workman's Lien" to reasonably restrain the aircraft. But it gets even more interesting if the aircraft is cross hired and not owned by your client..........
Torres is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 09:08
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Established.
Age: 53
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
torres , surely the maintenance bill is the owners responsibility, cross hired or not.

Removing a prop always helped to get the bill paid in extreme cases.

CASA???? So long as you did it before 9am after 5pm, during lunch hour or on a weekend or public servant holiday, they would never know or care.
The Messiah is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2002, 14:05
  #18 (permalink)  
RAJAM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Damnit!!
Wonder if he'll at least let me come to his place for dinner every day next week, no make that for the next 12 months, cause the money he owed to me would sure have been handy in the basket.
Thanks for that Mr T.
Lets just hope that whoever fills the run looks after the pilots,I think they have earned that,and the poor guys having to take the agressive phone calls,they probably need some stress leave,wishing them all well.
 
Old 24th Aug 2002, 16:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Otaio,

You would not say there might be just a few engineers around who have slightly opportunisitc tendancies then?
Wheeler is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2002, 01:59
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Aussie
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Opportunities

Oh there are plenty of opportunistic engineers. After all we are all trying to make a living.

As for the legal aspects of a workmans lien. Well you can always find something wrong that will ground an aircraft.

Why else would operators want MEL's. Even when there is an MEL you still won't have to look to hard.

After all it is my license that says whether the aircraft is flyable or not and of course if I get it wrong then I lose my livelihood, if I get don't get paid its also my livelihood.

In other words, if you are in aviation for the love of it leave and let the business people run the show.
otaio is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.