Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Channel 9 Under Investigation MAX Promo

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Channel 9 Under Investigation MAX Promo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Apr 2021, 22:17
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 449
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by StudentInDebt
http://www.airsafe.com/events/report...2005-final.pdf
Not a spectacular “crash” but some errors on the part of the pilots caused an overrun. The aircraft hit a car and the impact caused the death of a car passenger.
True. You have me on a technicality. Not quite the same as plunging a plane load of passengers from 35K feet. But still, there was a single fatality, and metal was bent.

Dr. Dres penchant for middle management generalizations and cadet scheme love distracted me Ethiopian may not be a third world airline. But it sits closer than is comfortable.

What fascinates me is this; Some posters expound on the relative ease with which they would have handled the MCAS failure. Boeing attempted to prove just that. They brought MAX operator pilots into the Sim and gave them multiple attempts to solve the problem. It went badly. Consistently, even with forewarning of what was about to occur. No startle factor. And, they didn’t bring in pilots who were fresh out of a cadet sausage factory.
JPJP is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2021, 23:49
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AMONGST BRIGALOW SUCKERS
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by JPJP
True. You have me on a technicality. Not quite the same as plunging a plane load of passengers from 35K feet. But still, there was a single fatality, and metal was bent.

Dr. Dres penchant for middle management generalizations and cadet scheme love distracted me Ethiopian may not be a third world airline. But it sits closer than is comfortable.

What fascinates me is this; Some posters expound on the relative ease with which they would have handled the MCAS failure. Boeing attempted to prove just that. They brought MAX operator pilots into the Sim and gave them multiple attempts to solve the problem. It went badly. Consistently, even with forewarning of what was about to occur. No startle factor. And, they didn’t bring in pilots who were fresh out of a cadet sausage factory.
SRM (and our fictitious Sky God windup man FWRWATPLX2) seen largely unfazed.
BEACH KING is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.