VARA to be off-loaded?
Thread Starter
VARA to be off-loaded?
Rumours circulating today that Bain Capital intend to offload VARA as part of a further review of the Group's operations. Alliance have been offered 'first dibs' but have walked away from the proposal / offer given they have just acquired the 14 E-Jets.
Another Bain broken promise to staff?
Another Bain broken promise to staff?
Last edited by Agent_86; 26th Mar 2021 at 05:00.
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Perth
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought VARA was profitable? Its more the contracts that are worth anything
If Alliance arnt interested, who would be - Skippers - unlikely, Network - unlikely, Cobham - maybe?
Rex......?
If Alliance arnt interested, who would be - Skippers - unlikely, Network - unlikely, Cobham - maybe?
Rex......?
Thread Starter
Apparently part of the broader business review, Ms Jayne wants to concentrate on establishing the 'Hybrid' VA Mainline and do away with the associated costs of running VARA as a side gig. Bain are obviously pushing the thumbscrews to save even more money so they can get ready for a quick 'flip' on VA.
Thread Starter
As for REX buying it, would they even want to take on another project?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obviously there are some medium to long term risks with that business (fleet renewal, contracts up and down). As well as the management distraction which is probably the key reason behind any offload.
I don’t think many will disagree, we all know Virgin needs to wind the clock back 15 years and go back to the roots of a NG operation only.
Might not be all bad news for those working in the west. If it’s a money maker with long term contracts someone will bite.
I don’t think many will disagree, we all know Virgin needs to wind the clock back 15 years and go back to the roots of a NG operation only.
Might not be all bad news for those working in the west. If it’s a money maker with long term contracts someone will bite.
Apparently part of the broader business review, Ms Jayne wants to concentrate on establishing the 'Hybrid' VA Mainline and do away with the associated costs of running VARA as a side gig. Bain are obviously pushing the thumbscrews to save even more money so they can get ready for a quick 'flip' on VA.
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Perth
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be interesting to see what the thinking is about on carriage. I suspect the whole FIFO model is changing in WA with the parochial Labor Government pushing for the entire workforce to be domiciled there. This obviously drives economic activity for WA but in reality how long will that last?? People might be happy to do it for a year or two, but if your entire extended family is on the east coast how practical is it for your family to live in WA as opposed to just doing some sort of FIFO from the east coast?
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Village
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Profitable for now, there in lies the issues as detailed above. The business model doesn't align with the strategy, maintaining something which needs a 5yr fleet replacement plan along with assoc. costs. Why keep it if you can spin it off for a bit of cash.... and we all know what the 5 year strategy is....
Thread Starter
Whats this got to do with VARA? Whether the FIFO worker lives in perth or syd/mel, the roster (contract) wouldn't change. The same number of people are required for the shift cycle, they are all mobilizing through PER regardless.
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Perth
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well everything. If it all goes to a Perth centric model then you have no real competitive advantage and have to scrap against every other contractor vying for the business. If however say 30% of the contract then flowed onto interstate flights that's a different proposition for a national airline. Charter Operators can't compete against a national airline as they can't offer the connections.
Thread Starter
Profitable for now, there in lies the issues as detailed above. The business model doesn't align with the strategy, maintaining something which needs a 5yr fleet replacement plan along with assoc. costs. Why keep it if you can spin it off for a bit of cash.... and we all know what the 5 year strategy is....
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not surprising.
How VARA can survive with the legacy agreements it has I don’t know. Sorry, but why the pilots don’t take a hard look at the Alliance and Network terms and wake up is beyond me.
In the new world, If you’re not competitive you’re unemployed.
So sad.
How VARA can survive with the legacy agreements it has I don’t know. Sorry, but why the pilots don’t take a hard look at the Alliance and Network terms and wake up is beyond me.
In the new world, If you’re not competitive you’re unemployed.
So sad.
Fits in the VA decision strategy though, sell off the only thing flying and making money throughout this whole mess
Last edited by SpyderPig; 26th Mar 2021 at 15:40.
Originally Posted by Barrt3344 View Post
Will the staff still have a right to return to the mothership
Will the staff still have a right to return to the mothership
The VARA people from the ATR who were previously made redundant and have a deed which outlines a return will come back eventually, if they want too, within the deed time frame. If the current VARA op is flogged off, then no, they will not be able to return via a deed, but would have to apply like any other ‘joe or joette’ off the street. That’s how I read it. Could be wrong though. It all depends on the fine print, like anything. But why would they want to come back????