Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Clearance to land in NSW to be dependent on presence of Covid test team

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Clearance to land in NSW to be dependent on presence of Covid test team

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2020, 07:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,888
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Clearance to land in NSW to be dependent on presence of Covid test team

Following the release of passengers yesterday in Sydney before Covid tests were performed new rules will be introduced.

ABC News 24 report that flights will not be permitted to land until Covid testing teams are positioned and ready at the gate.

Yesterday the health team were still testing passengers from an earlier flight when passengers from the later flight were released.

mjb
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 08:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mickjoebill
ABC News 24 report that flights will not be permitted to land until Covid testing teams are positioned and ready at the gate.
Jeez, better brush up on the mayday call for hitting reserve fuel...
Stickshift3000 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 08:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha...wouldn’t believe any ABC newsfeed,.... or any Commercial newsfeed for that matter, getting anything about Aviation correct.
Square Bear is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 09:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The sandpit
Posts: 14
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stickshift3000
Jeez, better brush up on the mayday call for hitting reserve fuel...
Its the media, I dare say, when they say “can’t land”, they actually mean “open the door”
chazwazza14 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 12:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,784
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
In that case, my landings are getting much smoother... unless the wind catches the door.
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 12:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Nothing in the NOTAMs restricting landings.

I suspect it’s a state directive for disembarkation.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 23:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by compressor stall
Nothing in the NOTAMs restricting landings.

I suspect it’s a state directive for disembarkation.
It is, hold on the taxiway until NSW health is in place at the gate. Airport rep in the terminal reports to the safety car who reports to the tower who clears the aircraft to the gate...what could possibly go wrong.
Boeingpilot738 is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 23:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Boeingpilot738
It is, hold on the taxiway until NSW health is in place at the gate. Airport rep in the terminal reports to the safety car who reports to the tower who clears the aircraft to the gate...what could possibly go wrong.
Sounds seamless
havick is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 00:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
I think that is a good plan. If it breaks down at any point it fails safe. The aircraft doesn’t disembark until every one is on the same page. It also puts the aircrew in the loop who are probably just happy to be at work logging time.

People need to get a grip and stop whining about small inconveniences and start looking at the big picture.
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 00:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ozbiggles
I think that is a good plan. If it breaks down at any point it fails safe. The aircraft doesn’t disembark until every one is on the same page. It also puts the aircrew in the loop who are probably just happy to be at work logging time.

People need to get a grip and stop whining about small inconveniences and start looking at the big picture.
Agreed, a good plan, I’m not complaining about the procedure but the company or ground crew weren’t across it yesterday like ATC or NSW Health. I’m sure it’ll be ironed out in the next few days. In the end it worked just fine with NSW health basically running it. And agreed biggles, thrilled to be back in the seat.
Boeingpilot738 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 00:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Now I’m jelly, good to hear you are logging some time.
I think it is good to have the ‘crew’ in this loop. A pain in the backside no doubt but that is 2020 in a nutshell but I think as pilots we are generally pretty good at keeping the park brake set until we are good to go and as we see from this incident it leads to a Tempo ****efight if we don’t.
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 01:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ozbiggles
Now I’m jelly, good to hear you are logging some time.
I think it is good to have the ‘crew’ in this loop. A pain in the backside no doubt but that is 2020 in a nutshell but I think as pilots we are generally pretty good at keeping the park brake set until we are good to go and as we see from this incident it leads to a Tempo ****efight if we don’t.
ATC were excellent and understood exactly what needed to occur, like you say, it’s important the crew are in the loop, there’s no harm that can come with the aircraft on the taxiway with the park brake set.
Boeingpilot738 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 01:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,254
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Why do you need the aircraft waiting on the tarmac burning fuel? Just don't connect the airbridge to the aircraft until the health people are in place. The ground agent has to wait at the first set of doors for the health people to accompany them to the airbridge. Really, the best solution is to have someone talk to someone to talk to the Tower to talk to the aircraft to tell them they can continue to the gate? Please can we amend the Constitution so that the States have to submit to the Commonwealth when there is a national health issue.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 01:09
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Why do you need the aircraft waiting on the tarmac burning fuel? Just don't connect the airbridge to the aircraft until the health people are in place. The ground agent has to wait at the first set of doors for the health people to accompany them to the airbridge. Really, the best solution is to have someone talk to someone to talk to the Tower to talk to the aircraft to tell them they can continue to the gate? Please can we amend the Constitution so that the States have to submit to the Commonwealth when there is a national health issue.
There most likely is a better solution and I dare say we’ll end up with something like what you’ve suggested, I imagine this was a hastily arranged procedure that’ll be refined over time.
Boeingpilot738 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 01:30
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
I agree I think what lookleft said is a better way., I’m sure with some crew feedback it will find a natural solution. The problem might be if the aircraft gets to the gate like it did last night it is not fail safe. Once the beacons are off the ground crew will engage, even if the health staff aren’t there. I’m sure Sydney ground has a bit more spare time then they used too to get involved. I don’t like wasting fuel but a small price to pay at the moment until we normalise the procedure.
The Jetstar CEO fronted the media today and said there was some talk about all the different state requirements being co-ordinated.
Perhaps aircraft onto the gate but beacons stay on until the co-ord is confirmed?
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 01:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ozbiggles
I agree I think what lookleft said is a better way., I’m sure with some crew feedback it will find a natural solution. The problem might be if the aircraft gets to the gate like it did last night it is not fail safe. Once the beacons are off the ground crew will engage, even if the health staff aren’t there. I’m sure Sydney ground has a bit more spare time then they used too to get involved. I don’t like wasting fuel but a small price to pay at the moment until we normalise the procedure.
The Jetstar CEO fronted the media today and said there was some talk about all the different state requirements being co-ordinated.
Perhaps aircraft onto the gate but beacons stay on until the co-ord is confirmed?
I think with only very minimal arrivals the parking of the aircraft with the beacon on is a good solution, I’m guessing at the moment that NSW health don’t want the aircraft anywhere near the terminal without their people in place, which from reading the article was the issue the other night, multiple arrivals and NSW health teams stretched thin on the ground. It’s going to take some time to weave government protocols into airline ops. I feel for the Jetstar staff, I haven’t seen the interview with Gareth Evans but in certain media it feels like they’ve been thrown under the bus somewhat.
Boeingpilot738 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 02:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
I noticed it a lot in a now previous life, introduce things without talking to the operators. I’m not saying pilots know it all but a quick ask for some input might have pointed out to whoever owns this that here is already a procedure that would dovetail well into this ie, no one approaches the aircraft until the beacon is off and in this Covid world the beacon doesn’t come off until the feds/state are in the aerobridge. I think with that procedure you wouldn’t even need ATC, they just clear you to the gate as per normal and your airline AMCO gives you the nod once you are on the gate and then you turn the beacon off...is simpiles!!
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 04:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 512
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
What has any of this got to do with airline operations.
An airline transports people in this case, from A to B. What happens to the passengers and any arrival procedures are NOT the responsibility of an airline.
Which ever twerp decided to the contrary is an idiot. As are those that have accepted that decision.

CC
Checklist Charlie is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 04:42
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Well ok CC, how should it be done?

Keeping in mind airlines have always had a responsibility to check people have a valid passport and a valid ticket on the way out. Are you suggesting Health staff should open the aircraft doors? Are you suggesting at the cost of many millions we redesign every domestic terminal so it has a customs type area so health staff can do their job there?

I’m keen to hear a better, cheaper way of doing it, or are you just going to whine?
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 05:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 512
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Oz, the management of these health checkers must get their act together and have them ready and in place to meet the arrivals. If C.I.Q & H in the form of "Border Security" can do it for International arrivals perhaps the health people could learn from them.

If you want to have health department checks before boarding then go your hardest.

I repeat, these are health department checks that they must carry out, the checks are NOT the responsibility of the airline (or its staff).

CC
Checklist Charlie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.