Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Swissport in trouble?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Apr 2020, 13:10
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
They were facing a large reduction in work already pre all this, as Tiger effectively were axing half its network, so axing half its Swissport work also, as they service the entire Tiger contract. They also do the majority of Virgin International work so that is high risk at the moment it seems.

On the the flip side, I guess higher chance they might gain a larger share of Virgin Domestic work when Virgin 2 Launches. The buyers of Virgin will want to know why they pay baggage loaders $30 an hour when they can get a contractor, Swissport, to do it for $20. As they already do it in a large chunk of the network, why not roll it out nationwide! The numbers will be attractive, and if it’s down to a case of doing it, to make Virgin a viable option vs shutting it, then so be it.

Are all their staff not Casual?

PoppaJo is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2020, 19:28
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don’t know anyone personally at Swissport.

I do know they are an organisation that seems motivated to underpay and overwork baggage handlers as evidenced by court rulings:

https://www.nationaltribune.com.au/t...p-at-airports/

We mightn’t have children being sent down coal mines anymore but here is yet another example of the dire need for unions and workplace legislation.

PG
Popgun is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2020, 22:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 787
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by cnsnz
Perhaps it is more to highlight the lack of support provided by the govt to Ground Handlers whom provide a very large portion of staff to the Aviation Industry?
Ground Handlers have not recieved any assistance from the aviation industry relief package.
I would have thought the workers were covered by jobkeeper & would probably end up with more in their pockets each week than they are currently on.
This is another foreign company winning work by undercutting genuine local bids & then using whatever work conditions they can dream up to force on their workers to make their sham bid work.
The only place for outfits like this is outside the borders of australia & make sure they pay every cent of entitlements to their workers & every cent of tax they owe to the government before they depart on a 1 way trip.
Its time the companies in australia woke up to parasite overseas companies(there are many more) that tender & win work with unworkable finances & then want government support.
blubak is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 00:18
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dnata workers (Dubai owned) are not eligible now, so I assume these guys are not either.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 00:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Zealand
Age: 71
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the Vice President of speaking ****e - Dalessio, been stood down also? It would be good as it would give him more time to work on his hair plugs.
Paragraph377 is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 04:43
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Home
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by wheels_down
Dnata workers (Dubai owned) are not eligible now, so I assume these guys are not either.
Dnata has fallen victim a rule that makes companies 100% owned by a foreign government ineligible for the payment. Swissport, through HNA Group, may be 100% foreign owned but not 100% foreign government owned.
regional_flyer is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 04:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by blubak
Its time the companies in australia woke up to parasite overseas companies(there are many more) that tender & win work with unworkable finances & then want government support.
I'm sure thats why qantas sent their best exec to oversee the shutdown and handover of Qcatering over to Dnata. Good job Sandra, qantas onboard food is better than ever before, love the microcookies.
unobtanium is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 04:48
  #28 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,486
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by regional_flyer
Dnata has fallen victim a rule that makes companies 100% owned by a foreign government ineligible for the payment. Swissport, through HNA Group, may be 100% foreign owned but not 100% foreign government owned.
Well then, the Govt. can hand back all the Income Tax they paid. That should last a bit of time for them. A nasty can of worms this.
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 6th May 2020, 05:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by regional_flyer
Dnata has fallen victim a rule that makes companies 100% owned by a foreign government ineligible for the payment. Swissport, through HNA Group, may be 100% foreign owned but not 100% foreign government owned.
I wonder how this will affect the local staff of foreign airlines operating in Australia? I suspect this loophole could catch a few...
lc_461 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.