Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar strike threat ‘We will sell the 787s’

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar strike threat ‘We will sell the 787s’

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2020, 21:34
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
The problem with Jetstar though is they will get the A321 XLR with 240 seats on it which will severely restrict the range and also make passenger comfort unbearable for medium/long range operations. I note from the article above to achieve the maximum range airbus is saying a two or three class config with no more than 200 seats.
the max range mentioned in the article is 4700nm. JQ will only need about 3800nm to reach east coast Aus to its Asian destinations.

As for Pax config, the A321LRs will only have 232 seats, less than the maximum Airbus could’ve squeezed in. If the XLRs are configured to be primarily long haul they may have a few rows of business, perhaps bringing the seat count to around 220ish.

With an MTOW of 101T, Empty weight of around 52T (the NEOs engines are heavier) and 29T of fuel (max for worst case) that leaves 20T for payload. JQ plans on average of around 90kg per passenger inc bags which equates to 222 pax.

These are VERY rough numbers, but they illustrate that it could be possible.

Its also worth keeping in mind the savings for the company of returning to a single fleet. The costs of capping some flights from time to time v the costs of keeping a token fleet of wide bodies I think make this a very real possibility.
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2020, 22:37
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
The fall of Hawaii will be purely the fault of these over remunerated, underworked pilots. We simply cannot afford to be paying highly skilled people six times the Aussie wage and comparable industry rates. So we are sending these aircraft to a business where Pilots earn 30% more.

Hopefully Karl rips into these crooks when fronting morning television in due course.



PoppaJo is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2020, 23:01
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a reason no other airline has applied the "airline within an airline" concept to the scale attempted by Fort Fumble: RASK

It appears the A321 will lower unit cost, as was promised when Boston Bruce Buchanan chased the B788 to replace the A330 borrowed from its parent.
Unless the JQ model can somehow generate revenue premium, the international business will continue to haemorrhage.

To be clear it is nothing to do with pilot remuneration.
Rated De is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.