QF 787 to Santiago International Airport
Maybe Rothera Air Facility here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/67...8.127389?hl=en
Enough room to get in, but not out?
Enough room to get in, but not out?
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fortunately, as the erudite here announce, as it hasn't happened, one can rest assured it won't.
‘In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, while in practice there is’
-Benjamin Brewster 1882
-Benjamin Brewster 1882
I thought the argument about 2 v 4 engines on long over-water flights was finished 30 years ago - but not in Australia it seems...................
BB:
So how many times in the last 20 years has a 4 engined aircraft lost two engines but been saved by the fact that it’s a quad?
How many times in the last 20 years has a quad lost ONE engine but been saved by the fact it’s a quad? And then there’s the Kegwort style incidents. Semantics, twins have less failures because they HAVE to
Assuming something won't happen because it is yet to happen is hubris.
From the man obsessed with undertaking a ‘longitudinal study’ before launching any new route.
How many times in the last 20 years has a quad lost ONE engine but been saved by the fact it’s a quad?
Ummm - Kegworth type incidents?
When in doubt, I would ALWAYS err on the side of a bigger hammer. An earthmoving mate gave me exceptionally good advice which does have some significance around 65S. ‘Always use the biggest machine you can - it works out better in the long run’ And at 65+S, it’s ALWAYS a long run!
When in doubt, I would ALWAYS err on the side of a bigger hammer. An earthmoving mate gave me exceptionally good advice which does have some significance around 65S. ‘Always use the biggest machine you can - it works out better in the long run’ And at 65+S, it’s ALWAYS a long run!
But others may find comfort in more modern aircraft built to later certification standards and more upgraded systems and operated to stricter requirements
Of course, I’m totally ignoring the fact that ‘modern’ jets never break down or need maintenance.
Maybe it might be best if you retire with your trusty quad and 1970’s thinking