Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

QF 787 to Santiago International Airport

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF 787 to Santiago International Airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2019, 01:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by kiwi grey
Maybe Rothera Air Facility here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/67...8.127389?hl=en

Enough room to get in, but not out?
Last time I looked Rothera was a bit over 800m with water at each end. And that's when it's not buried. Good Luck with that.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 08:57
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
So you are at 65south and the Cargo Fire Warning goes off. Where is the nearest runway?

Airbus, Boeing, 2 or 4 engines. Same applies!
Captain, introducing practicality into the discussion will not be welcomed.
Fortunately, as the erudite here announce, as it hasn't happened, one can rest assured it won't.


In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, while in practice there is

-Benjamin Brewster 1882
Assuming something won't happen because it is yet to happen is hubris.
Rated De is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 08:59
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,421
Received 362 Likes on 211 Posts
I thought the argument about 2 v 4 engines on long over-water flights was finished 30 years ago - but not in Australia it seems...................
Asturias56 is online now  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 09:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
I thought the argument about 2 v 4 engines on long over-water flights was finished 30 years ago - but not in Australia it seems...................
In Australia, our ponds are larger

BB:
So how many times in the last 20 years has a 4 engined aircraft lost two engines but been saved by the fact that it’s a quad?

How many times in the last 20 years has a quad lost ONE engine but been saved by the fact it’s a quad? And then there’s the Kegwort style incidents. Semantics, twins have less failures because they HAVE to

V-Jet is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 10:21
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 617
Received 153 Likes on 48 Posts
Assuming something won't happen because it is yet to happen is hubris.
HA!
From the man obsessed with undertaking a ‘longitudinal study’ before launching any new route.

How many times in the last 20 years has a quad lost ONE engine but been saved by the fact it’s a quad?
Not sure what you’re driving at there V-jet? Given a twin is not doomed if it only loses 1 engine, the real threat is losing 2. So how often in the modern age does this happen?
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 12:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Ummm - Kegworth type incidents?

When in doubt, I would ALWAYS err on the side of a bigger hammer. An earthmoving mate gave me exceptionally good advice which does have some significance around 65S. ‘Always use the biggest machine you can - it works out better in the long run’ And at 65+S, it’s ALWAYS a long run!
V-Jet is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 12:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by V-Jet
. ‘Always use the biggest machine you can - it works out better in the long run’ And at 65+S, it’s ALWAYS a long run!
If it makes you happy, so be it.

But others may find comfort in more modern aircraft built to later certification standards and more upgraded systems and operated to stricter requirements
compressor stall is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 12:40
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 1,086
Received 59 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by compressor stall


If it makes you happy, so be it.

But others may find comfort in more modern aircraft built to later certification standards and more upgraded systems.
Siple Island is lovely this time of year. McMurdo even better - they have accomodation (for scientists) although there is nothing currently available on Airbnb....

Of course, I’m totally ignoring the fact that ‘modern’ jets never break down or need maintenance.
V-Jet is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 12:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by V-Jet
Of course, I’m totally ignoring the fact that ‘modern’ jets never break down or need maintenance.
No but non quads don't operate under grandfathered ETOPS exemptions.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2019, 22:56
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,469
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by V-Jet


Siple Island is lovely this time of year. McMurdo even better - they have accomodation (for scientists) although there is nothing currently available on Airbnb....

Of course, I’m totally ignoring the fact that ‘modern’ jets never break down or need maintenance.
Maybe it might be best if you retire with your trusty quad and 1970’s thinking
morno is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.