Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetconnect ZK aircraft to now be VH registered

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetconnect ZK aircraft to now be VH registered

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Aug 2018, 01:48
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Inefficiency compounded by no ZK/VH aircraft cross-crewing by Jetconnect crews. One or the other depending on whether they’ve ticked those boxes for CASA
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2018, 04:16
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ditch
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low Pass wrote :


Sorry to sound facetious, but , really.

Reminds me of the chorus from one of Midnight Oils hits :
[/QUOTE]

Well PB/ Virgin NZ and AirNZ have full protection of the NZ based flying. I dunno but maybe JC union should have secured that years ago
Low Pass is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2018, 05:34
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keg
I heard a rumour that Jetconnect pilots aren’t flying too many hours at the moment and with increased A330 services on the Tasman there’s lots on inefficient patterns and lots of paxing? Anyone confirm?
Yes the crew that have gone across onto the QF AOC are paxing more then operating. With flight hours as low as 25-30hours for the roster.
who_cares is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2018, 22:42
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Enzed
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keg
I heard a rumour that Jetconnect pilots aren’t flying too many hours at the moment and with increased A330 services on the Tasman there’s lots on inefficient patterns and lots of paxing? Anyone confirm?
Confirmed, although the paxing is expected to decrease once everyone's over to the QF side of the fence. 50/50 split between ZK and VH crew, and you can't fly both. Should be 100% by mid November, when the JC AOC will cease to be.
fullnoise is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2018, 00:53
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: GAFA
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how long until jetconnect crew are doing more than just the tasman?
Captain Fun is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2018, 01:09
  #166 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
At least until they comply with Australian workplace law. They may be permitted to operate domestically within Australia under CASA regs but I suspect the FWC would take a very dim view of them operating domestically whilst on different terms and conditions to that which applies to Australian crew.

Of course were they to be subject to the Qantas SH EA then there’d be no restrictions on them operating domestically. I’m sure the JC crew would love the pay rise and better conditions. Of course there’d be knock on effects that they may not like also.
Keg is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2018, 03:27
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Captain Fun
So how long until jetconnect crew are doing more than just the tasman?
Capt Fun,

The AIPA should be looking at the Jetstar model. Both the Australian and the New Zealand operations are run on the same AOC, but with 2 seperate EBAs, as the QF mainline and Jetconnect operation will run. JQ New Zealand tech crew cannot operate domestically in Australia. Australian Pilots can operate on the Tasman and domestically in New Zealand. Some New Zealand Pilots flew in Australia as part of their command upgrade training a little while ago, however they had to be temporarily employed on the JQ Aus EBA. I believe that this caused more trouble than it was worth for the company and that the training captains are now sent to NZ instead.

If the Jetstar unions can protect Aus domestic flying, surely the AIPA can protect QANTAS’.
ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2019, 00:33
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In a better place
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post edited
help me jebus is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2019, 23:23
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bobbelmore
How about circa 1965-66? They were called "instant captains". Most of them were a disaster. Some of them didn't make it to captain and became permanent F/Os and some left the company to get a job as captain elsewhere.

Seniority is not a really good way to select who gets promoted but it sure as hell beats all the other alternatives.
Disaster it certainly was --- with some honourable exceptions, Qantas got the rest of the industry's misfits, floaters and "strange" Captains.
As for the "theory" that created the "need" ( it was not a pilot shortage or lack of experienced F/Os) -- the less said the better.
At least it resulted in a revolution in Flight Training, a complete turnover of "management".
Tootle pip!!

PS: Prior to "seniority" in the old QF, promotion was determined by "which Squadron/Ship/Golf Club/Sailing Club" was on your CV.
LeadSled is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.