Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Better than the rest of us?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Nov 2017, 05:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 203
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Better than the rest of us?

Is anyone able to confirm that someone refused to switch his tablet to flight mode on QF 2133 (Canberra to Melbourne) today thereby causing a return to the gate?

If it's true - what is wrong with these people? Flight time just over an hour yet he feels the needs to be online. So many people these days believe that the world revolves around them!
Bull at a Gate is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 05:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the fuss? the pilots are sitting up there with theirs on.
thorn bird is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 06:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
I am a commuter between Brisbane and Melbourne. In the last 6 months I have noticed a trend for passengers to simply ignore the requests of crew to "switch devices to flight mode" so much so that on four occasions in the last couple of months passengers have initiated or received phone calls on taxi out or, on two occasions, on the take off roll. In each case the crew ignored it despite it being quite obvious who was infringing the policy.

I'm sure it's the same on all carriers, but I find it frustrating that an announcement is made, the majority of passengers ignore it and no-one thinks that it may be necessary to either allow the use of these devices or actually make some effort to ensure compliance with a regulatory requirement.
C441 is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 06:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Why the fuss? the pilots are sitting up there with theirs on.
Last item in the before start checklist before getting the clearance to pushback "PEDs to flight mode". Thats in the airline I work for anyway.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 06:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Why the fuss? the pilots are sitting up there with theirs on.
There are eejits everywhere!
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 06:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,253
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
I thought Airnorth was the only one flying Ejets now?
Lookleft is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 06:38
  #7 (permalink)  
When you live....
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 0.0221 DME Keyboard
Posts: 983
Received 13 Likes on 4 Posts
I've often wondered why CASA don't send FOIs onboard and prosecute a few who don't switch off/flight mode. Would soon get the message across via the media..
UnderneathTheRadar is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 07:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by UnderneathTheRadar
I've often wondered why CASA don't send FOIs onboard and prosecute a few who don't switch off/flight mode. Would soon get the message across via the media..
They'd probably prosecute the crew for not enforcing the use of Flight Mode.
27/09 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 07:43
  #9 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
someone refused to switch his tablet to flight mode on QF 2133 (Canberra to Melbourne) today
Article mentions 'Friday night' without specifying which Friday night.

https://www.3aw.com.au/selfish-ceo-f...-flight-delay/
TWT is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 08:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 283
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Last item in the before start checklist before getting the clearance to pushback "PEDs to flight mode". Thats in the airline I work for anyway.
And about as regularly obeyed as the 'do not remove headsets until top of climb' regulation from my experience. I recall a certain checky getting a phone call around 500 ft on approach a while ago...
das Uber Soldat is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2017, 20:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lost, but often Indonesia
Posts: 652
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was on an Air India (never again) flight once. 2 men were pacing up and down the aisle during the take off using their phones despite repeated requests to sit down by the FA's. There seems to be something in the Indian culture where men will not take instructions from women...
Octane is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2017, 04:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
What is the regulation regarding flight mode?
umop apisdn is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2017, 07:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 304
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by umop apisdn
What is the regulation regarding flight mode?
From the CASA website: https://www.casa.gov.au/aircraft/sta...ty-information

Portable electronic devices

Electronic devices

The following information will help to ensure your safety when using electronic devices on the aircraft:
  • Check with your airline to see if and when you can use your electronic device - policies vary by airline
  • Charge your device before you fly
  • Follow the instructions by crew and on-board procedures. The airline has the final say about the type and use of electronic devices allowed on board
  • There may also be restrictions on the use of electronic devices on the tarmac
  • Always follow crew instructions and immediately turn off your device if asked
  • You cannot use mobile phones for voice communications or for mobile telephone functions in-flight
  • Devices must remain in flight mode throughout the flight
  • You may use the WiFi connection on your device if the plane has an installed WiFi system and the airline allows its use
  • Devices weighing more than 1kg such as standard laptops, must be stowed under seats or in the overhead lockers during take-off and landing and as directed by crew to prevent injuries in the event of turbulence or an accident
  • Smaller hand held devices that weigh less than 1kg must also be secured for takeoff, landing and when advised by crew, but airline policy may allow the device to be secured in the seat pocket, garment pocket or in your hands
  • If you lose your phone in flight do not move the seat and contact a crew member immediately
  • Passengers who do not comply with instructions are putting your safety at risk. If you notice unlawful activities you can raise it with the cabin crew and your concerns will be taken seriously.
  • Make Safety Your First Priority.

Put down electronic devices, books and newspapers and listen to the safety briefing.
Pearly White is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2017, 15:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 7 Posts
I was wondering more about an actual reg.

I know that is it is reg if it is in the Ops Manual, but I never remembered seeing a standalone one.
umop apisdn is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2017, 21:49
  #15 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 1,478
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
There seems to be something in the Indian culture where men will not take instructions from women...
And a few other cultures.
601 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2017, 00:17
  #16 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,175
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by umop apisdn
I was wondering more about an actual reg.

I know that is it is reg if it is in the Ops Manual, but I never remembered seeing a standalone one.
It would be an offense under part 2, division 3 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 with maximum penalty of 10-20 years depending on the actual charge. It would not be CASA, it would be the AFP.

That is the Australian law enacting the Tokyo Convention and another treaty, it also gives the power to captain to arrest people on flights in Australia, i.e. if someone failed to turn off a PED, return to their seat, smoking onboard etc, the captain could arrest the person and the the passenger would most likely face a court.
swh is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2017, 00:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 868
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Is there here a double-standard? Compare and contrast: a CEO refuses to obey the lawful direction of a crew member by refusing to comply with the law WRT his mobile phone. Aircraft returns to the gate, pax apparently off-loaded and then silence as to whether police called, arrest made, charges laid, pax banned or sanctioned by carrier etc etc. On the other hand a bogan gets drunk, or partially drunk, on an aircraft and misbehaves. Police are called, pax is off-loaded, arrested, charged, convicted and fined etc etc.

To me, the CEO's behaviour is far worse than that of the drunk bogan on a number of grounds yet his treatment would appear to be much more lenient. Why so? Discuss.
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2017, 09:11
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possibly that the probability of violence on board is higher with the bogan than the CEO. Both would be equally capable, but I'd be betting on the drunk bogan to start trouble first.
I agree that the line between the two is somewhat blurred.
AEROMEDIC is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2017, 09:50
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
SWH, surpringly the relevant parts of the Tokyo convention must be part of the relevant state and territory crimes act. How the AFP fit into that, I have no idea
Bula is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2017, 11:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,296
Received 332 Likes on 126 Posts
Surely a quick-thinking PA announcement would have solved the problem causing minimal delay.

"Folks, you may have noticed us taxiing back to the terminal. Its all thanks to the selfish ignoramus in seat 3A who is refusing to switch his personal electronic device to flight mode. You might like to share your opinion with him as his refusal to follow CASA regulations will cause you all personally at least a 20 min delay at your destination. Whilst we would never condone physical assault, common f@rkin courtesy IS our number one priority."

Quickly followed by "Thank you for your prompt cooperation, would seat rows 4 to 20 please return to their seats, ensure their seatbelts are fastened, and pick up any errant PED parts on the way."
Chronic Snoozer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.