Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Possible Plan for Sydney Jetbase

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Possible Plan for Sydney Jetbase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 11:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: melbourne
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possible Plan for Sydney Jetbase

Fourth terminal for Sydney Airport on drawing board as competition looms
doug606 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 02:28
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: melbourne
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A fourth terminal at Sydney Airport for international travellers that is connected to the existing domestic terminals is part of plans to help it cope with strong passenger growth and a competing airport at Badgerys Creek in the city's west.

According to the preliminary plans, Terminal 4 would be on the site of Qantas' jet base sandwiched between Terminal 3 and Qantas Drive on the airport's perimeter.

A pier for the new terminal would also extend south from the domestic precinct, while "remote aprons" could be built near the northern boundary in Airport Drive.

A month after turning down its "right of first refusal" to build and operate the new airport at Badgerys Creek, Sydney Airport chairman Trevor Gerber told shareholders that three years of consultation with the federal government over Western Sydney Airport had forced it to develop detailed plans to expand its existing operations.

"We think the demand is clearly there, too."

The number of passengers passing through Australia's largest airport rose almost 6 per cent to 41.9 million last year, underpinned by a strong growth in travellers from China and other parts of Asia.

While a fourth terminal is part of the long-term plans, the airport's priority for the next five years is a $500 million expansion of the international terminal that will include three new gates, air bridges and an expansion of baggage-claim areas.

A fourth terminal at the airport will be built on what is now the Qantas jet base.

Sydney Airport chief executive Kerrie Mather said the timeframe for construction of Terminal 4 depended on continued growth in passenger demand and the ability to redevelop the Qantas jet base, on which the airline had a long-term lease until 2020.

"It would be difficult to put a timeline on [development of Terminal Four]. It will depend on demand and a precursor is being able to access the jet base," she said.

The removal of the jet base to allow for construction of the new terminal will require the relocation of Qantas hangars to other parts of the airport, most likely to its south-east, near the third runway and General Holmes Drive.

The hangars at the jet base are used mostly for aircraft maintenance.

Sydney Airport bought back the long-term lease on Terminal 3 from Qantas almost two years ago for $535 million; it had been due to expire in 2019. As part of the deal, the airport gave Qantas assurances about it having access to T3 until 2025.

Ms Mather, who revealed in March her plans to leave the top job once a replacement is found, said a new terminal would "provide new, international gates adjoining" T2 and T3.

"It is important these plans remain flexible, and that we deliver an integrated solution for passengers, terminal connectivity and ground access," she said.

She cautioned there was a "whole range of planning" scenarios to consider before construction of a new terminal could begin.

Six years ago, the airport unveiled plans to break the divide between the domestic and international terminals by creating two airline-based precincts.

Under that $1 billion-plus proposal, Qantas, Jetstar and the group's alliance partners were to be housed under one roof at the domestic terminals T2 and T3, while Virgin Australia would shift all its operations from T2 to the international terminal.

However, the airport quietly dropped the plans less than a year later because Virgin believed the move would place it at a significant disadvantage to Qantas.

Virgin's opposition was based on the argument that its passengers would take longer to drive from the central city to its operations if they were based at T1.
doug606 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 03:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
They obviously have reason to believe that a larger proportion of the 80 movements/hour will somehow magically become allocated to International operators.

I keep looking at that IPEC office at DOM4. Wouldn't that make a great facility for small regional carriers?

....you know, the ones that all got driven out of business by ever-increasing compliance costs and administrative complexity and Airport fees?
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 08:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Under the big blue hangar
Age: 40
Posts: 240
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Journalism at its best.

"The hangars at the jet base are used mostly for aircraft maintenance."

You don't say
Bootstrap1 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 08:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Bootstrap1
Journalism at its best.

"The hangars at the jet base are used mostly for aircraft maintenance."

You don't say
Could it be that the journalist actually knows the difference between "maintenance" and "defect rectification requiring hangarage"?
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 09:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 984
Received 94 Likes on 45 Posts
Where will staff park? Looks like blue emu is not apart of the big plan
SHVC is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 13:03
  #7 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm sure this was all announced circa 2010 as part of the ten year forward plan. Can't see it being in place for 2020.
Keg is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 13:29
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
I'm sure this was all announced circa 2010 as part of the ten year forward plan. Can't see it being in place for 2020.
Most of it got scuttled when Frank Lowy took them to court and won which meant that T2 extensions couldnt happen until Lowy's lease expired. Then they wanted to align the terminals with alliance partners but that got canned. Then there was supposed to be a new maintenance hangar built which looks like it will now be T4.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 13:49
  #9 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Ah, that's right. The big maintenance hangar down near intersection of Charlie and B10. Doesn't matter if it's terminal or maintenance hangar. Both will suck for 16L arrivals with a SW wind blowing.
Keg is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 14:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by SHVC
Where will staff park? Looks like blue emu is not apart of the big plan
Somewhere near Heathcote.
unobtanium is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 10:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Under the big blue hangar
Age: 40
Posts: 240
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Thats right the big 777 capable hangar that Borghetti promised when he went to Virgin. That went quiet pretty quick.
Bootstrap1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.