Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Tigerair Bali flights grounded

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Tigerair Bali flights grounded

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Jan 2017, 02:53
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something appears to be in the works.

737 VH-VUD flying MEL-ADL-MEL this arvo. Seemed to be some sort of proving flight.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 03:07
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: In the bush
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
back to running on VA sched
continueapproach737 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 04:24
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe tigerair had been given approval to commence line training this week, whether with px or just proving flights no idea.

Understand that " X " % of required sectors or hours for training have already been completed in FFS operating on real time flight from B/off to B/in.

No idea status of application for B737 AOC.

cheers.
galdian is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 04:40
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be interesting to know the legal position of those who are due to depart Australia for Bali in regard to their losses in hotel bookings, loss of holiday time etc. ? Its not like at this time of year you can just book somewhere else.

Normally there is not much can be done if a flight is cancelled but in this case, if it is proved that their is a regulations problem it may get expensive for Tiger/Virgin.

If it was my holidays ruined and there were grounds,I'd certainly want expenses and damages.

Wunwing
Wunwing is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 06:42
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia the Awesome
Posts: 399
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what travel insurance is for, go without at your peril��
Roj approved is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 07:17
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
It would be interesting to know the legal position
If you read the fine print that EVERYONE agrees to when they buy tickets on line you will see that they pretty much guarantee to do absolutely nothing.

https://www.virginaustralia.com/au/e...s-of-carriage/

11.1 We will use all reasonable endeavours to provide to you the mode of transport or services the subject of the Booking but, in circumstances beyond our
control, we may without notice substitute other means of transport or service.
11.5 We may need to cancel or delay and reschedule flights or services due to industrial action, landing restrictions, airport loading restrictions, unsuitable weather conditions, technical problems, operational reasons, or any event beyond our reasonable control, and scheduled flight times or destinations are not guaranteed. Subject to the consumer guarantees referred to in paragraph 2.4 and to the extent permitted by any applicable Laws, we are not liable for any Loss which you may incur as a result of any such delayed or rescheduled flight or service.
11.6 Compensation

If you suffer Loss as a result of Events Within Our Control, you may be compensated by us in accordance with our Customer Service Plan (when applicable) or Guest Compensation Policy.
These are from the VA website but most carriers are the same.

The interesting event a few years ago in Europe ws the volcanic ash cloud. If I remember correctly Ryanair would not refund passengers as they said it was "beyond their control" however the UK and EU have some robust passenger protections so they lost. Here it is...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...les-court.html

I am amazed at the lack of consumer protection for airline passengers in Australia compared to the EU, I guess that is the value of lobbyists.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 08:03
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
If you read the fine print that EVERYONE agrees to when they buy tickets on line you will see that they pretty much guarantee to do absolutely nothing.

https://www.virginaustralia.com/au/e...s-of-carriage/







These are from the VA website but most carriers are the same.

The interesting event a few years ago in Europe ws the volcanic ash cloud. If I remember correctly Ryanair would not refund passengers as they said it was "beyond their control" however the UK and EU have some robust passenger protections so they lost. Here it is...

Ryanair WILL have to pay compensation to customers stranded by volcanic ash cloud, rules court | Daily Mail Online

I am amazed at the lack of consumer protection for airline passengers in Australia compared to the EU, I guess that is the value of lobbyists.
One could argue that regulatory incompetence is not beyond Tigers control.

If they were doing their job they would have dotted all of the regulatory Is and crossed all the Ts before they sold any tickets. The fact is they didn't.

I agree, a volcano is beyond an airlines control. This mess isn't.
IsDon is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 08:21
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
Well since "we" as the general public do not really know why the Indonesian's decided to not allow the flights to continue we cannot know that there was any incompetence.

To prove incompetence a party would need to know exactly the terms of the objection by Indonesia and furthermore prove that VA/Tiger could/should have reasonably forseen that outcome. Then you have proved negligence. Good luck getting access to internal company documents.

As said above, that is why one purchases travel insurance.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 10:17
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Decent Travel Insurance would cover this scenario.

Book an alternate carrier after making contact with them so everything is documented and go for it.

My Agency doesn't book Tiger unless totally stuck. Apologies to those good people who work for them but I can get myself into enough trouble without their help.

Best all

EWL
Eastwest Loco is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 11:01
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well since "we" as the general public do not really know why the Indonesian's decided to not allow the flights to continue we cannot know that there was any incompetence.
There was definitely incompetence!
The Bullwinkle is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 20:13
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Decent Travel Insurance" doesn't cover anything beyond expenses? If this is a case of incompetence or negligence surely there should be damages for loss of a holiday since at this time of year it would be almost impossible to source other transport and accommodation?

Wunwing
Wunwing is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 06:15
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Approval given from 3rd Feb

A320s only.

Time to dust off those A320s parked up in the Alice.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 10:07
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Biatch
Why don't Q go through this sorta crap? Why is it so hard to operate there?
Because Qantas is a real airline that doesn't make these sort of stupid mistakes. This is basic square one aviation law for anyone who's completed an aviation degree. Australia is a Contracting State so is Indonesia (to the Chicago Convention) and the rules about ownership, etc. and who operates the services are quite clear. Also, the entirety of Qantas is 51% or more Australian owned (actually around 55% at present I think) so this never comes up, nor with JQ who are 100% owned by Qantas. I don't want to get down on TT but unfortunately. when you look at the history with the grounding by CASA some years ago and other things that I'm aware of myself having worked for another operator who 'loaned' galley equipment to TT when they started, etc. it doesn't surprise me that there's a lack of 'i dotting' and 't crossing' potententially happening. I'm not on the inside so it's all speculation but it does seem consistent with past issues.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 19:43
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,469
Received 310 Likes on 116 Posts
Real airline?

Ohh the arrogance

How do you not know that Indonesia was quite happy with the previous arrangement and then just decided one day that they want to change the rules?
morno is online now  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 20:34
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure the A320 will have the range to get to DPS from ymml.
Airbus A320321 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 21:24
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320s to DPS why didn't they just do this from day one ? I thought the A320 didn't have the legs to get MEL-DPS (no tech knowledge here never flown an A320) I wouldn't be surprised if the TT 737 fleet plans are completely shelved now, as I don't think the planning goes much beyond the next f-up.
On the bright side I might just transfer over to TT in 2018 and get my free A320 endo.
Bluewhine is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 21:45
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Not home
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by morno
Real airline?

Ohh the arrogance

How do you not know that Indonesia was quite happy with the previous arrangement and then just decided one day that they want to change the rules?
Morno, if you actually believe that, then can I suggest you switch the last two letters of your name.
JDavola is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 21:53
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: International
Age: 76
Posts: 1,394
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
DPS nonstop from MEL, SYD or BNE in a A320 with a full load. I would like to see that !.
B772 is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2017, 22:45
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
MEL-DPS load restricted with Sharklets
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2017, 00:40
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 23
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bluewhine, you are obviously a little behind on events. Tiger got their first 737 up in their own right 2 days ago with proving flights, and the type on AOC is getting very close now. A number of Check & Trainers are in place. The 320's will not be renewed as leases expire. Last to go ( I think) is mid 2018. Better hurry if you want to fly one !
air command is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.