Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Canberra to Doha

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Dec 2016, 12:49
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Gafa
Posts: 198
Received 10 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by azure70
Its obvious Mt Majura is an impediment to the growth of Canberra Airport and should be removed.
A mining company in The Pilbara region of Western Australia has an airport located at 2100ft ASL.
The mining company wanted to get rid of a charter operator utilising BAE146 aircraft in favour of a new operator using E-jets.
High terrain at the end of the strip was a problem for the E-jets, so the mining company sent in the blast crew and heavy machinery and removed the mountain.
Incidentally the mountain was full of high grade iron ore which was processed through the plant, so it was a win for everyone....except NJS.
Why stop at Mt Majura, most of the country would be quite thankful if someone "removed" the rest of the terrain around Lake Burley-Griffin...
Maggie Island is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2016, 14:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: An Airport Near You
Posts: 674
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better question......what is going on in Doha?
....connections to many other worldwide destinations obviously.
360BakTrak is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2016, 17:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Spot on Rad_Alt_Alive!
Performance ain't a problem.
They (QR) go into a lot higher & shorter, around the world, on older less capable equipment (I do too).
Canberra?
Well their current approval for Australian Major cities is maxed-out but is "unlimited, to Regional Centres".
Happy Landings
Chocks Away is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2016, 19:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with YSCB is they forgot to build a wall around it to keep the politicians in....
Tuck Mach is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2016, 02:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
#20 Source?

#20 Source?

Google red river in spanish

I worked for them in another life :-)
azure70 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2016, 22:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Whanganui, NZ
Posts: 279
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Tuck Mach

'The International Airline Activity report by the Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development showed, on average, each of the six flights from Wellington to Canberra in September held just 94 passengers.
The Boeing 777 has 266 seats, meaning there was an average passenger load factor of just 35 per cent.'
Maybe that's the number of passengers boarding in Canberra to go to Wellington, and doesn't include the number of passengers already on the aircraft flying from Singapore to Wellington.
I say this because a niece recently visited me in Wellington flying from Canberra, and she said the aircraft appeared nearly full.
kiwi grey is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2016, 23:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 47
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've flown it a couple of times and it was half to two-thirds full each time.

The rumour I've heard is that the extra leg from Canberra to Wellington made the entire route feasible. What would the incremental costs of that leg be? and how many more passengers would the route pick up by having the Wellington extension?
Preemo is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2016, 17:09
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hahaha. They fly fully loaded out of Kabul and Kathmandu.. Canberra has no performance issues compared to those places... 3500 compared to LSALT of 16000 in KBL and i think its 29000 roughly around KTM.
mtrench is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 00:35
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: HKG 'visitor'
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's put some actual numbers on this. Apologies, data for B777 - 300ER. No data for B787/A350.
YSCB
RWY 35
30C 0WIND Q1013 PACKS OFF
MAX RTOW 294.1T [MAX STRUCTURAL TO WEIGHT IS 351.5T] FLAP5
AT 15C 301.9T F5
AT 0 C 303.5T [ENG A/I ON] F5

RWY 17: SAME ASSUMPTIONS
30C 316.8 F20
15C 325.2 F20
0C 327.9T F15


Hope that helps.

Last edited by spleener; 14th Dec 2016 at 01:01.
spleener is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2016, 09:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for the figures, it gives some idea.
Here are are few points to note though:
- Many Operators use flap 15 for TKOF on the B773.
- There are also APU-Pack; Improved Climb & Bump options for TKOF to better the performance.
- QR also operate a fleet of B777-200LR's which may be a consideration for such a run.
- The 787 / 350 wings are a lot more efficient than this old duck.

Happy Landings
Chocks Away is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2017, 04:04
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.ausbt.com.au/qatar-airwa...rom-early-2018

Seems like this one was downgraded to a wishy washy/possibly/maybe idea of getting to CBR via SYD with an A350, in another year at best....
-JLS- is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2017, 22:04
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the issue with pushing Canberra traffic via Qantas who is the oneworld partner? Even with subsidies from governments or whoever, 20 or 30 pax to Canberra and back is hardly worth it?

Is this more a sneaky ploy to operate an extra Sydney to Doha 'via Canberra'.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2017, 22:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: ...second left, past the lights.
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Canberra is a "Regional Port", considered under pax numbers as per Adelaide.
By them servicing these Regional Centres they're hoping to leverage more access into/out of the Major Ports of Sydney, Melbourne and start Brisbane, as the A380 is already on Syd and starting Melb soon.

I've got my popcorn and comfortable chair
Happy Landings
Chocks Away is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.