HOBART AIRSPACE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HOBART AIRSPACE
Wonder who did the peer review/QA check on this? Or is the call for comments meant to flush out all the errors and false assumptions.
https://www.casa.gov.au/files/aerona...fhobart2016pdf
Quick check with the owners of Cambridge - they are wondering why the runway lights were ignored. Seems the authors missed the runway lights in their brief visit and review of the survey questions.
What else is missing?
MJG
https://www.casa.gov.au/files/aerona...fhobart2016pdf
Quick check with the owners of Cambridge - they are wondering why the runway lights were ignored. Seems the authors missed the runway lights in their brief visit and review of the survey questions.
What else is missing?
MJG
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oz
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mt Gahan, Great initiative to " quick check " with the owners!
A "Quick check" of you on linkedin shows obviously where your ambition comes from.........................
A consultant - will tell you the time using your watch......................
A "Quick check" of you on linkedin shows obviously where your ambition comes from.........................
A consultant - will tell you the time using your watch......................
Hey FPDO,
I DO know Mr Gahan and I DO know a great many in the relevant area in CASA and I assure you there are precisely three within CASA who would come within a bull's roar of Mr Gahan's expertise - and they were not involved with the referenced document. MJG has been a competent consultant for a very long time now so instead of firing off cheap shots why not address some specific subject matter where you believe you have greater expertise?
I DO know Mr Gahan and I DO know a great many in the relevant area in CASA and I assure you there are precisely three within CASA who would come within a bull's roar of Mr Gahan's expertise - and they were not involved with the referenced document. MJG has been a competent consultant for a very long time now so instead of firing off cheap shots why not address some specific subject matter where you believe you have greater expertise?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank Advance,
Guess he also missed the fact that I've been working overseas for the past 5 years.
Now, for the rest of you: as a past national airspace regulator I take a critical look at all airspace dcuments published byCASA.
MJG
Guess he also missed the fact that I've been working overseas for the past 5 years.
Now, for the rest of you: as a past national airspace regulator I take a critical look at all airspace dcuments published byCASA.
MJG
Last edited by mgahan; 3rd Sep 2016 at 23:56. Reason: removed the stuff about the black list - because there is no black list.
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oz
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Terry Towelling Hat Brigade need something to whinge about in their small space..........................
Mr Gahan why dont you use the 30 day period to supply feedback?
I have used it in the past , works well !!!
Mr Gahan why dont you use the 30 day period to supply feedback?
I have used it in the past , works well !!!
Last edited by FPDO; 6th Sep 2016 at 03:30.
how about the fact that the cost to "fix" TASWAM isn't included - only to do a fully fledged radar system - why was TASWAM was installed with several issues outstanding as this report identifies which doesn't allow it to be used as was directed by the minister at the time?
The Cambridge aerodrome lights issue will be raised, within MY reply.
The Cambridge aerodrome lights issue will be raised, within MY reply.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AH YES, SURVEILLANCE IN AIRSPACE
Swells raises an interesting issue.
Wonder if the report drafters had the benefit of reading the results of CASA project 09/372: Consultancy to quantify the Safety benefit of surveillance in airspace.
MJG
not a typo, it's a cut and paste from the RFQ back in the days when CASA used an initial capital for the word safety.
Wonder if the report drafters had the benefit of reading the results of CASA project 09/372: Consultancy to quantify the Safety benefit of surveillance in airspace.
MJG
not a typo, it's a cut and paste from the RFQ back in the days when CASA used an initial capital for the word safety.
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oz
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MGahan,
Hows progress on the response to CASA going? you know, getting in touch with CASA to raise constructive points about what you think is not correct about the Hobart Review?
Seems you have plenty of time to doodle around with silly wind up posts..oh correction........pushing your published reports from when you were in the big world.......
Anyhow Ill let you get back to glueing the canopy on your Airfix 72nd scale Stuka Dive Bomber....................
Hows progress on the response to CASA going? you know, getting in touch with CASA to raise constructive points about what you think is not correct about the Hobart Review?
Seems you have plenty of time to doodle around with silly wind up posts..oh correction........pushing your published reports from when you were in the big world.......
Anyhow Ill let you get back to glueing the canopy on your Airfix 72nd scale Stuka Dive Bomber....................
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oz
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey FPDO,
I DO know Mr Gahan and I DO know a great many in the relevant area in CASA and I assure you there are precisely three within CASA who would come within a bull's roar of Mr Gahan's expertise - and they were not involved with the referenced document. MJG has been a competent consultant for a very long time now so instead of firing off cheap shots why not address some specific subject matter where you believe you have greater expertise?
I DO know Mr Gahan and I DO know a great many in the relevant area in CASA and I assure you there are precisely three within CASA who would come within a bull's roar of Mr Gahan's expertise - and they were not involved with the referenced document. MJG has been a competent consultant for a very long time now so instead of firing off cheap shots why not address some specific subject matter where you believe you have greater expertise?
Statute or Nautical?
good to see things aren't been taken personally FPDO
You weren't the one who did the previous paper saying TASWAM would be going to ground level are you?
https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/file...dge_review.pdf
With the introduction of the TASWAM, it is projected that coverage in the Hobart terminal area will extend to as low as 100 to 200 ft AGL (and possibly to ground level) providing ATC with a full approach and departure monitoring capability. The TASWAM will also provide limited redundancy to the Launceston radar coverage above 5,000 ft AMSL pending removal of the Launceston radar. After this time, TASWAM will be permanent solution for surveillance coverage over Tasmania.
I mean after all, it was only just a ministerial directive at the time...
You weren't the one who did the previous paper saying TASWAM would be going to ground level are you?
https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/file...dge_review.pdf
With the introduction of the TASWAM, it is projected that coverage in the Hobart terminal area will extend to as low as 100 to 200 ft AGL (and possibly to ground level) providing ATC with a full approach and departure monitoring capability. The TASWAM will also provide limited redundancy to the Launceston radar coverage above 5,000 ft AMSL pending removal of the Launceston radar. After this time, TASWAM will be permanent solution for surveillance coverage over Tasmania.
I mean after all, it was only just a ministerial directive at the time...
Best of luck to you
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Oz
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow Deranged Agenda ! a tad harsh there ole chap!
Thanks for the best wishes re luck, but I make my own luck
You should give people a chance and get to know people a little better, turn that frown upside down....
Safe landings and dont forget your PUFF checks.
Thanks for the best wishes re luck, but I make my own luck
You should give people a chance and get to know people a little better, turn that frown upside down....
Safe landings and dont forget your PUFF checks.
