Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

SIA to launch CBR

Old 21st Jan 2016, 09:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: East of Greenwich
Posts: 90
I was wondering if there were any worries out of CBR to SIN on a hot day.
HotPete is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 09:48
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 399
Cant wait to see the first landing in a good WLG Nor-wester.

Say about 320M/25kts G40kts.

A steady 60kts is a bit to easy.
slamer. is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 09:52
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 287
"A 772 doing CBR-WLG? That's going to be amusing at the Wellington end."

I have seen ZK-OKQ Air New Zealand at Wellington, and many of the others in the Air New Zealand 773 fleet have visited at some point. If you search Wellington Airport Boeing 777 on youtube theres some vids of them there. My video of ZK-OKQ is here on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oX7Qseo_DRs

At the time of the second and more destructive Christchurch Earthquake in 2011 Air New Zealand used their Boeing 777-200 thru Wellington with no problems, and I guess they would not have done this unless the loading of passengers would be high (if any one has anymore info on these flight please contact me!)

And don't forget we used to have 747SPs and we have had two 707s visit Wellington.

I can't wait to see the Singapore Airlines Boeing 777-200s at Wellington!!!

Best Regards

Tim Gorman
Well aware they've been there before. Like I say, going to be amusing.
juliet is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 10:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Te Anau
Posts: 2
To be honest, I think that Singapore Airlines probably wanted to do a direct service from Singapore to Wellington, but due to the size of the runway at Wellington, they decided to try Canberra knowing that the CEO of the airport has always loved the idea of international routes and he has showed expression of interest for the CBR to WLG route. I maybe wrong but this is my opinion on the scenario. Also, I don't think the route would last very long without VA and ANZ codesharing it. I wouldn't pick SIA - CBR as earning a profit. Then again, I maybe wrong
kiedistv is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 21:09
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 91
I was wondering if there were any worries out of CBR to SIN on a hot day.
I would imagine it would be quite easy for a 777 that's only 1/3 full (if that).
Lookleft is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 23:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MEL
Posts: 165
I think SQ has done quite a lot of research on Canberra being a suitable destination by analysing postcodes of pax booking on them ex SYD and other similar demographics, not sure about the Canberra-Wellington sector, VA or NZ doing that with a 737/E190/A320 would be able to cope on that sector, unless SQ are going to fill the 777 belly with frozen sheep out of Wellington.

If SQ wanted somewhere to fly the plane for the day, Canberra-Hobart might have been a better tag leg, I'm sure the Tassie govt / Hobart airport would have welcomed them with open arms & a bit of cash.
DJ737 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 00:57
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 91
If thats the case then SIA would need to offer the same fare as SYD-SIA as CBR people will drive to SYD if it saves them money or catch a Murray's coach to the Intl terminal. They might as well announce SIA-NTL if its just about postcodes.

I hope you are not serious with this statement:

If SQ wanted somewhere to fly the plane for the day, Canberra-Hobart might have been a better tag leg, I'm sure the Tassie govt / Hobart airport would have welcomed them with open arms & a bit of cash.
Lookleft is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 01:15
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The 245 bulkhead
Posts: 61
Maybe Wellington had deeper pockets than Hobart?

Wellington ratepayers to pay $8m over 10 years for Canberra flights | The National Business Review
LPS500 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 03:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 105
Meanwhile Jetstar too has begun offering international flights from Canberra; to Fiji, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand and USA. Yes, the flights really are on the Jetstar website. Albeit code share with Murray coaches from the Jolimont bus station!
There are going to be some very confused incoming pax.
ozaub is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2016, 13:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 727
Looking for a start date on this as a pax.
Ejector is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2016, 19:46
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Here & there
Posts: 738
Ejector:

20 September 2016

'Capital Express' Service To Connect Singapore, Canberra And Wellington
BuzzBox is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 00:26
  #32 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,042
Lookleft - you obviously don't like SIA, for whatever reason, and it shows!
parabellum is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 03:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 387
BTW SIA as an airport code is Xian. Singapore is SIN
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 03:35
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 50
Posts: 2,583
BTW Chris. SIA in the context of this thread is Singapore Airlines. Not the airport code! You will have seen that the OP stated SIN for Singapore Airport...
White Knight is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 04:35
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 387
"If thats the case then SIA would need to offer the same fare as SYD-SIA as CBR people will drive to SYD if it saves them money or catch a Murray's coach to the Intl terminal. They might as well announce SIA-NTL if its just about postcodes."

This is what provoked my post - there are other examples
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 10:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 399
Wonder if this has anything to do with lengthening the WLG rwy..??
slamer. is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 11:30
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Te Anau
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by slamer. View Post
Wonder if this has anything to do with lengthening the WLG rwy..??
Since they're only flying to Canberra from WLG I doubt it. But maybe they're trying to bring on a direct route to Wellington and are delaying by linking capital cities
kiedistv is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 14:05
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 6/F CAD Kingdom
Posts: 5
Anyone knows if they (SIA)'re still holding the longest passenger flight time record? Thanks.
Chris Leung is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 14:19
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PER
Posts: 1,140
Reports that the service at the Wellington end is heavily incentivised by WCC and Infratil (the airport owners) so will be interesting to see how long this lasts...
topend3 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 19:43
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 30
"Also had a B747-200 in WLG for Norman Kirk's funeral. Airforce One."

BalusKaptain, are you sure you are right there?
Do you have a photograph?

Best Regards
timboeing707 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.